Wall of Corruption in Florida - Will the Attorney General Listen to Public Outcry?

INTERNET MESSAGE RECEIVED BY
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE ON 08/21/2010

RE: Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig, FL Suprem Court
Justices, Florida Bar and more

Subject: Public Corruption Grand Jury

I have spoken at the NY Senate Judiciary Committee who is holding hearings on Court Corruption in NY related to the NY Supreme Court Whistleblower case listd below

My RICO and Antitrust, involving many FL attorneys and
Judges is lated to the Whistleblower Lawsuit.

Florida Supreme Court & Florida Bar sued in Trillion Dollar Federal RICO &

ANTITRUST LAWSUIT - Radio Interview Inventor Eliot Bernstein on Les
Winston's bar the Florida Bar Iviewit Technologies Inventor, Eliot Bernstein, Interviews with Disbar the

Florida Bar’s Radio Host Les Winston ~ The Biz 880am regarding Trillion
Dollar Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit against Florida Bar, FL Supreme Court,
Justice orge Labarga, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig & more.
Lawsuit Legally “Related” to NY Supreme Court Whistleblower, Christine C.
Anderson who reveals an attorney complaint case fixer “Cleaner”, Naomi
Goldstein at NY Ethics Dept which regulates WallStreet.
Press Release Distributed @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-inventor-eliot-bernstein-interview-with-disbar-the-florida-bar-les-winston-the-biz-880am-regarding-trillion-dollar-fed-rico-suit-against-flo-1276897073.html 
or online interactive version
@ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=315
Disbar the Florida Bar Radio Host Les Winston interviews Iviewit Tech
Inventor Eliot Bernstein regarding illegal activities at the Florida Supreme Court,

Florida Bar & Judge Jorge Labarga.LISTEN TO INTERVIEW @
http://disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=96
orhttp://www.iviewit.tv/DisbarFloridaBar23.mp3

World-renowned Inventor of Digital Video & Imaging Mathematical Scaling Formulas, Eliot Bernstein discusses with radio talk show host Les Winston f Disbar the Florida Bar his Trillion Dollar Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, naming the Florida Bar, Florida Supreme Court & Labarga as Defendants.

The it marked “legally” related by Judge Shira Scheindlin to a NY Whistleblower suit filed by a Supreme Court of NY Staff Attorney, Christine C. Anderson,

Esq. Bernstein’s Amended Complaint @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf


Anderson alleges the NY Attorney Disciplinary Dept, responsible for the oversight of WallStreet lawyers, has been whitewashing and cleaning disciplinary complaints against attorneys, including US Attorney’s, DA’s & ADA’s. Anderson named a “Cleaner” from the Ethics Dept of the NY Supreme Court, Naomi Goldstein, supervisor at the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.

No wonder WallStreet melted down & attorney regulators go unpunished for failures after causing massive damage to the American People, only to then leave government positions or cushy law firm partnerships. Anderson claimed staff attorney, Nicole orrado Esq., on her way to testify at deposition supporting Anderson’s suit was threatened & intimated by a Sr. Court Official regarding giving estimony, creating Federal Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering & more by Court Officials.
Bernstein suing the FL & NY Supreme Courts, State Bars & Disciplinary
Agencies, claims conflicted members of the courts, partners from Proskauer Rose LLP
law firm, the main conspirator in Bernstein’s case along with law firm Foley &

Lardner, illegally handled complaints against partners while holding
official title with the courts & disciplinary agencies. In NY, Bernstein’s
allegations led to unanimous consent of 5 justice of the NY Supreme Court to have
former NY State Bar Association President, Steven Krane, a Proskauer partner,
ordered for investigation for conflicts & the appearance of impropriety. Proskauer’s
Kenneth Rubenstein, the sole (soulless) patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC,
ordered for investigation along with attorney Raymond Joao, who claims to
have put 90+ patents into his own name. Bernstein claims patents filed by Joao
were during & after the time Iviewit retained Joao to patent inventions for
Bernstein, Joao patented them for himself instead. After termination as
Iviewit counsel, Joao worked for infamous convicted felon Marc S. Dreier,
sentenced July 13, 2009, to 20 years in prison. Thomas Cahill, former
Chief Counsel of the First Dept whom Anderson alleges to be the ringleader at
the First Dept, ordered for Special Inquiry. Cahill’s investigation relates
to Krane’s conflicts & Cahill’s role in aiding and abetting the RICO Criminal
Enterprise, which Bernstein claims is composed mainly of corrupt mob type
law firms. Anderson under oath in Scheindlin’s US Fed Court stated “Cleaner”
Goldstein was cleaning complaints against “favored law firms and lawyers”.
NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo fingered by Anderson & Bernstein for
illegal representation of the accused NY State Officials in violation of his
public office duties. Cuomo represents the State Officials both professionally &
personally on the broke NY State taxpayers’ dime and Bernstein alleges the
NY Attorney General is guilty of Felony Title 18 Obstruction of Justice.
Obstruction caused by Cuomo’s conflicting his offices with scienter from
investigating the accused State Defendants they represent while
simultaneously failing to call in a non-conflicted investigator to investigate the
Defendants on behalf of the People of NY.
Cuomo is duty bound by Public Officer Law 17(2)(b), which dictates the
Attorney General not represent State Defendants when conflict with their offices
exist.
Yet Cuomo not only represents the State Defendants when conflict exists in
both Bernstein and Anderson’s lawsuit but has failed to call in any outside
investigator to investigate the State Defendants, his clients, creating a
block to prosecution & obstructing justice. Cuomo, Eliot Spitzer & the NY
Attorney General’s office are Defendants in Bernstein’s suit. The fact they are
Defendants makes the continued representation of the State Defendants by
the Attorney General’s office bizarre and further illegal. Bernstein filed
criminal complaints with the Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn

Fine, the US Attorney General Eric Holder & others regarding the criminal
activities of both the NY and FL Officials.
Bernstein is the inventor of digital imaging & video technologies that
revolutionized the Internet, Television & Digital Imaging, the
technologies valued over a Trillion Dollars over the 20 yr patent life. Bernstein’s
patents are currently on Suspension with the US Patent & Trademark Office by the
Commissioner of Patents while the Office of Enrollment & Discipline (OED)
Director at the US Patent Office, the Federal Patent Bar, investigates
Bernstein’s attorneys for crimes including Fraud Upon the US Patent &
Trademark Office.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/USPTO%20Suspension%20Notices.pdf
Bernstein claims Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Stephen
Lucchesi claimed to be working with Harry I. Moatz, Director of the OED
investigating allegations of crimes against the US & more, Bernstein claims Moatz
confirmed collaboration with the FBI.
Bernstein calls for the end of attorney self regulation & self discipline
by their peers, which has obviously failed, in favor of charging attorneys
with criminal acts to criminal prosecutors, warning that victims of attorneys,
judges and prosecutors who file with attorney run state attorney
regulators are doing themselves a disfavor. Bernstein claims the attorneys gain
advantage through using the state disciplinary agencies, defending themselves in
conflict and gaining confidential information against them, while feathering their
caps with conflicted decisions on Supreme Court letterhead. Bernstein along
with Anderson, testified before the NY Senate Judiciary Committee in NY @
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&feature=player_embedded
&amp  ; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knQLll5hmjs&feature=player_embedded
Chaired by Hon. Senator John Sampson, the hearings to investigate
allegations of corruption in the NY Supreme Court Appellate Divisions. Hearings
remain ongoing & claims made by NY Senators attending to begin a Task Force to
investigate victims’ claims of legal process abuse.
According to Bernstein, one look only at the recent plethora of criminal
activity in the stock market & Ponzi schemes to see that all of these
schemes are run by law firms. Bernstein claims the Ponzis are illegal money
laundering operations for monies illegally obtained by the law firms Criminal RICO
Enterprise activities. Bernstein points to recent schemes such as Bernard
Madoff, former “Sir” Allen Stanford, Marc S. Dreier & Greenberg Traurig’s
involvement directly in a Ponzi, as evidence that lawyers are behind the
schemes & directly involved in intentionally creating subterfuge of the
regulatory agencies that could have prevented these schemes. Greenberg,
recall was central to Abramoff’s fraud and linked to the Stanford Regulatory
Failures.
Other Defendants, reported to the SEC for alleged Shareholder Frauds
relating to the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST include Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner
Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:
INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics
International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed
Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html 
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206 FINAL SEC FBI and more
COMPLAINT
Against Warner Bros Time Warner AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
Information regarding these Ponzi schemes and the relation to the Iviewit
crimes @
• Information regarding Greenberg Traurig’s involvement in a
recent
Ponzi, “The American Lawyer is reporting today, May 13, 2010, that the law
firm
of Greenberg Traurig has been sued for its willful participation in and
facilitation of what it knew to be an illegal Ponzi scheme” @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=313 Greenberg represents in conflict the
Florida
Bar and Florida Supreme Court Defendants in Bernstein’s Trillion Dollar
RICO
and ANTITRUST lawsuit, as Greenberg was retained patent counsel by
Bernstein &
therefore acts wholly in violation of law representing Defendants in the
matter.
• Information re the Bernard Madoff, Stanford & Dreier connections
to
Defendant Proskauer @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=307 “Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas
Sjoblom
Further Implicated in the Allen Stanford Ponzi Scheme, Failures of SEC in
Stanford Cited Further Supporting Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein’s Federal
Trillion
Dollar Lawsuit Claims”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=256 “Proskauer (Porksour) Rose Law Firm
Going
Down in Allen Stanford Ponzi, next the trail of money may lead to Iviewit
Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s stolen Trillion Dollar Patents”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=254 “Florida Bar Under Fire for Lack of
Regulation in Robert Allen Stanford & Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme,
Kenneth
Marvin defendant in Iviewit Multi Trillion Dollar Lawsuit”. After reading
the
article, one wonders if the Florida Bar reported this liability in the
Iviewit
Multi Trillion Dollar Federal Lawsuit to State Auditors?
The legally related cases to Anderson are @
Cases @ New York Second Circuit
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary
Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et
al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
5. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. -
WHISTLEBLOWER
LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed.
Judge
Shira A. Scheindlin @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di

strict%20NY/anderson/20071028%20Anderson%20Original%20Filing.pdf
6. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department

Disciplinary Committee, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RIC

O%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.doc
7. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di

strict%20NY/Esposito/20081228%20Luisa%20Esposito%20Original%20Filing.pdf
8. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial
Conduct,
et al.,
9. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di

strict%20NY/McKeown/20080307%20Kevin%20McKeown.pdf
10. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
11. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di

strict%20NY/carvel/Carvel%20Filing.pdf
12. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di

strict%20NY/Weisshaus/20080439%2008cv4053%20Gizella%20Weisshaus.pdf
13. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di

strict%20NY/McCormick/McCormick%2008cv4438%20SVM%20Cmplnt.pdf
14. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
15. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al

Other Press Releases

NEWS TIP - SEC CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST AOL, TIME WARNER, INTEL,
LOCKHEED,
SGI FOR SHAREHOLDER FRAUD! IVIEWIT PRESS RELEASE

Iviewit Press Release: World Renowned Inventor of Internet Video and Image

Scaling Formulae Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI
CRIMINAL Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL
Inc.,
Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner
for
Patent Theft, a car bombing and more. Read all about it Online
Interactive
Version of Press Release @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288

Hard Copy of the Release @

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-f

iles-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-tim

e-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html

(Copy & paste the urls to address bar if not clickable or see attached
PDF)

Prior Press Release re Supreme Court of New York Whistleblower Lawsuit

US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New
York,
et al. Criminal Allegations Requiring Senator John L. Sampson’s Immediate

Attention. In Judge Shira A. Scheindlin’s US Federal Court Whistleblower
Christine C. Anderson Reveals a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein, at the New
York
Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department ETHICS Committee
allegedly
Whitewashing Complaints for US Attorneys, DA’s and more, a scene more
reminiscent of the Gotti Trial on the 26th Floor of the same Federal
Courthouse...Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s Family Minivan Bombed in US Patent

Office Fraud files Twelve Trillion Dollar RICO Suit legally “related” by
Judge Scheindlin to the Whistleblower case (08-4873-cv US Court of Appeals
Second Circuit) and US District Court (07cv11196).

Where was the Press through all this, the Right Arm of Anarchy, not a
single report in over five years regarding a Car Bombing so powerful it blew up
three cars next to it in Boynton Beach Florida and not a single press story?
Where was the Press for the Whistleblower revelations of Whitewashing of
Complaints by the New York Supreme Court for US Attorneys and District Attorneys, a
Cleaner at the Ethics Department that regulates Wall Street Lawyers? Has
Investigative Journalism died? If there are any Journalists or
Investigative Reporters left on earth, please feel free to call me, Eliot Bernstein @
561-245-8588 or write iviewit@iviewit.tv to break the greatest patent
story ever told.

For an Interactive version of the attached Adobe PDF Letter to the New
York
Senate Judiciary Committee and Senator John L. Sampson below with Links to
all
Exhibits @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209

Subject: US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599) Anderson v The State
of New York, et al. Criminal Allegations Requiring Your Immediate Attention,
Revelation of “Cleaner” at NY First Dept Ethics Committee, Whitewashing
Complaints for US Attorneys, District Attorneys and Assistant DA’s and
More.

------
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Surf with Vision
Dear Hon. John L. Sampson, Chairman of the New York Senate Judiciary
Committee,

Please review the attached PDF Document [ or
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209
] which is a letter regarding the Criminal Allegations levied in the
Christine C. Anderson v. New York State et al. case to you and requires actions on
the part of the NY Senate Judiciary Committee.

Very Truly Yours,

Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
--------------------------------
World Renowned Inventor of Trillion Dollar + Technologies and Car Bombing
Victim Eliot Bernstein filed written testimony to supplement his live
testimony before a September 24, 2009 NY State Senate Judiciary Committee hearing
under Chair, NY Senator John L. Sampson, as announced in the attached press
release.

An interactive version of the press release is @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189 and the Formal Written Prepared Statement
is @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165 . The technologies are claimed to
be used across all Internet and Digital Television providers hosting and
distributing video, on Defense applications, Space and Flight simulators,
Guidance Systems, Medical Imaging Devices, GPS Mapping like Google Maps,
You-Tube, the Hubble Space Telescope and much more. Major Fortune 1000
and Wall street interests implicated in the case include Intel, SGI, Lockheed,
IBM,Comcast, Verizon, AOL TW, Yahoo, Universal Studios, Morgan Stanley, CIBC
and much more. In what is commonly now referred to as "Patentgate", the
attention of Washington, DC and Federal Agencies have been trailing the case for
years which involves allegations of Fraud on the US Patent Office and the
Attempted Murder of the Inventor's Family by a Car Bombing in Boynton Beach, Florida
strong enough to take out 3 cars, images @ www.iviewit.tv .

Bernstein filed a TWELVE COUNT - TWELVE TRILLION DOLLAR Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ( RICO ) Federal complaint, the case moved
its way in to New York when Bernstein's case was marked legally "related" by
Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin, to a Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine
Anderson. Anderson case comes from alleged corruption out of the Supreme
Court of NY First Department in Manhattan, which is heading to trial very on
October 19, 2009. Major Law Firms and Wall Street interests implicated in the
matter include major Defense firm Lockheed Martin, the Intel Corporation, Silicon
Graphics Inc and others.

Law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner implicated as central players
in the theft and fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Offices, which
have led to suspension of the Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Office
Commissioner are under investigation, the patents suspended while federal
investigations continue. Proskauer recently sued for aiding and abetting
the Stanford Ponzi scheme and a former SEC Proskauer partner has resigned from
the firm, leaving the firm with a global class action for the entire billions
stolen by Stanford. Ties to Madoff and Proskauer also abound and
Proskauer is also found representing themselves in court against Bernstein their former client, in MASS conflicts of interest.

The press release contains Links to Written Testimony and other releases including a Petition to President Obama and US Attorney General Eric Holder.

The full NY senate Judiciary Committee hearing regarding the Public Office

Corruption in NY can be found @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159 .

Bernstein’s Testimony comes at 4.02.08 on the video timeline where he declares that the State Bar Association is a drinking establishment and that it should be “blown up” and “hard pipe hitting investigators who hate lawyers”

should be charged with investigating and prosecuting dirty lawyers, judges and
politicians, to the jeers of the packed hearing room.

Press Release appeared originally at the totally awesome Free Press Release @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-senator-john-l-sampson-ny-senate-judiciar
y-comm-hearing-testimony-of-iviewit-inventor-eliot-bernstein-re-trillion-dollar-
fed-suit-naming-proskauer-1254966944.html

Amended Complaint – 12 Trillion Dollars @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%
20MED.pdf

February 13th 2009 Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama II to enjoin
TheHonorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General ~ Department
of Justice @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTO
RNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf

More @ Expose Corrupt Courts “BREAKING NEWS IN NEW YORK STATE COURT CORRUPTION TRIAL - Anderson Pulls in Powerhouse Trial Team to Confront Court Ethics
Corruption”

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/10/anderson-pulls-in-powerhouse-tri
al-team.html

Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum received your email regarding the Florida Bar and the Florida Supreme Court. Attorney General McCollum asked that I respond on his behalf.

Attorney General McCollum issued the following statement on the Florida
Supreme Court's order to convene a statewide grand jury on public
corruption:

http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/newsreleases/A26DE7C27763DB94852576BD005BB1E7

The Statewide Prosecutor will serve, by law, as the statewide grand jury's counsel. As mentioned in the above statement, our Statewide Prosecutor will work with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Florida’s state attorneys to identify investigations and cases to bring before the statewide grand jury. I am forwarding your correspondence to the Statewide Prosecution Office for review. However, due to the confidential nature of investigations, the Statewide Prosecution Office is not at
liberty to comment further. We will keep your concerns under advisement.

If you have not already done so, I also encourage you to convey your
concerns to Governor Charlie Crist's Office at:

Office of the Governor
The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001
Telephone: (850) 488-4441
Website: http://www.flgov.com/

You should consult your private attorney for any legal advice you may need. By law our office cannot give legal advice, statutory interpretations, or legal opinions to private individuals or businesses.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your concerns.

Sincerely,
Samantha Santana
Office of Citizen Services ""

Judicial Corruption in the Florida Supreme Court. Bill A. Corbin and the Abuse of Power in the Florida Judicial Process.

Judicial Officials Within the State of Florida Charged with Corruption

Bill A. Corbin disbarred by the Florida Attorney Fraternity.

STOP Judicial Corruption and Judges Being Above the Law.

" The story of former attorney Bill A. Corbin, unlawfully stripped of his law license in 1998, is one that needs to be heard by all Americans.

To see a brief summary of the horrors he and his family have suffered, click "OVERVIEW"... then hear Mr. Corbin's incredible story in his own words by watching a short four-minute YouTube video that he created.

For over ten years he has been continuously fighting for his constitutional right to a day in court to correct the injustices done to him. Judges have systematically and illegally denied Corbin any opportunity to face his accusers in open court. He is determined to clear his name whatever it takes. "

"The Florida Supreme Court, The Florida Bar, along with Bay County judge Judy Pittman, Calhoun County judges Hentz McClellan and Kevin Grover, Jackson County attorneys Frank Baker, Elizabeth Simpson, Thayer "Peck" Marts, Guy Green, Jerry Little, Matt Fuqua, Frank Bondurant, plus Regions Bank, Larry Gilley and Jack Brown from Jackson County are named as defendants in a multi-million dollar corruption lawsuit filed by former Calhoun County attorney Bill A. Corbin of Panama City.

Main charges in the lawsuit are:

Racketeering - Obstruction of Justice - Abuse of Power
Denial of Due Process - Conspiracy to Violate Civil Rights

A Story of Judicial Tyranny in the USA

"Over 3,300 pages have been filed in Corbin's case over 10 years, but all judges have refused to give him a day in court!

Governor Charlie Crist and Attorney General Bill McCollum are aware of this fact, yet have never investigated it! Concerned citizens should ask: WHY NOT?

Executive Office of the Governor - Switchboard: (850) 488-7146
Office of the Attorney General - Switchboard: (850) 414-3300 "

Source of Post and More Information on Bill Corbin
www.SupremeAbuse.com

No More US Judges Above the LAW.
Judges Should Have to Obey the Law.

" The following Florida judges and justices/former justices contend in Corbin's lawsuit against them that they are above the law, that they are not accountable or liable for their illegal actions against him and his family, or any other citizen, and as long as they wear their black robes that they are "clothed with absolute immunity" and therefore are untouchable:

Harry Lee Anstead, Supreme Court Justice
Kenneth Bradley Bell, Supreme Court Justice

Raoul G. Cantero, III, Supreme Court Justice
Nancy T. Gilliam, former Circuit Judge
Stephen H. Grimes, former Supreme Court Justice

James Kevin Grover, Calhoun County Judge
Major Best Harding, former Supreme Court Justice
Gerald Kogan, former Supreme Court Justice
Richard Fred Lewis, Supreme Court Justice

Harry Hentz McClellan, Chief Circuit Judge, 14th Judicial Circuit
Ben F. Overton, former Supreme Court Justice
Barbara Jane Pariente, Supreme Court Justice
Judy Markham Pittman, Circuit Judge

Peggy Ann Quince, Supreme Court Justice
Leander J. Shaw, former Supreme Court Justice
Joseph Quincy Tarbuck, Circuit Judge
Charles Talley Wells, Supreme Court Justice

In addition, as employees of the Florida Bar, an arm of the Florida Supreme Court, the following also contend they are not accountable or liable for their illegal and unethical actions against Corbin and his family, or any other citizen:

John F. Harkness, Jr., Bar Executive Director
John Anthony Boggs, Bar attorney
John Thomas Berry, Bar attorney

Luain Thrall Hensel, former Bar attorney
Edward Iturralde, former Bar attorney
Olivia Paiva Klein, Bar attorney
James Franklin Wells, Bar auditor "

Source of Above
http://www.supremeabuse.com/judgesabovethelaw.html

"A nineteen-count lawsuit has been filed by former attorney Bill A. Corbin against the Florida Bar and the Florida Supreme Court for damages of more than $100 million.

The lawsuit claims that corrupt judicial officials are involved in a massive cover-up to abuse power and obstruct justice, that when revealed, could rock the foundation of the U.S. judicial system.

Presented is documented evidence that a well-orchestrated conspiracy involving local, state and federal judges has maliciously denied former attorney Corbin access to the courtroom for over ten years.

Main Charges of the Lawsuit:

· Racketeering
· Obstruction of Justice
· Conspiracy to Violate Civil Rights
· Denial of Due Process

· Abuse of Process
· Abuse of Power
· Malicious Prosecution
· Illegal Confiscation of Property

In the lawsuit, Corbin alleges that the Florida Bar, assisted by the Florida Supreme Court, falsely accused him in 1998 of stealing clients' trust funds. Then, without lawfully required investigation, evidence, witness, complaint by anyone, or a hearing of any kind, his law license was summarily stripped, based only on unsworn false paper charges despite his sworn denial of the charges two days after their filing.

He says no evidence of any kind ever proved the serious charges, including no witnesses. He has never had his day in court.

After losing his good name, reputation, marriage, career, home, offices, and most other assets, plus the shame and humiliation of becoming a pauper, Corbin is adamant about getting the whole truth out in the open.

“The Bar has since admitted false charges were filed, yet I was illegally disbarred with no reason given,’ Corbin says, "and, other than a recently-discovered conspiracy of disgruntled lawyers, I still don’t know why this happened, but I have fought it since the beginning and I now hope to finally tell my side of the story to a jury in open court.”

BRIEF SUMMARY OF EVENTS
1. Without lawfully required investigation, witness, or evidence, on April 13, 1998, at the urging of some conspiring disgruntled lawyers who lost a suit Corbin had won, but sought revenge for their loss and bragged that they had connections with the Florida Bar and could get him back by having his license taken, the Bar falsely charged Corbin with stealing clients' trust funds.

Rather than evidence, the charges were based only on bookkeeping ledger cards, the bar admitting knowing they were incomplete and other documents could show the truth, but, incredibly, contended they had "absolutely no duty" to learn the truth before filing their false charges and taking his license.

2. Based only on unsworn false paper charges, without a court hearing, trial, witness, or evidence, and regardless of Corbin's sworn denial of the charges two days after the Bar filing, begging that no action take place that would harm his family, on April 22, 1998 his license was summarily suspended and all funds in his trust account plus unlimited earned fees that might be indefinitely collected later were frozen.

Only $5500 of $26,000 in the account belonged to clients; another $18,000 was collected during the prosecution but frozen and unavailable for family support.

3. While his license was "temporarily" suspended [for over three years], two trials of the charges were held, during which Corbin repeatedly asked who he had supposedly stolen from and how much, but no would or could answer him.

He learned during the case that sloppy bookkeeping had occurred in his office, but no evidence of stealing was ever shown.

During the trials, the Bar admitted false charges were filed, but regardless, no retraction was made to clear Corbin's name and he was disbarred, no reason given, and still unknown.

4. Destroyed in every way, including losses of good name, reputation, marriage, career, home, offices, and most other assets, plus the shame and humiliation of becoming a pauper, Corbin appealed the Bar's actions, asking the Florida Supreme Court, based on its past decisions, to correct the injustices occurring since 1996, but the requests fell on deaf ears. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to review the case.

5. Though essentially destroyed and unemployed since April 22, 1998 and now drawing Social Security, Corbin continues trying to clear his name and right the wrongs that have so severely affected him, his family, friends, and former clients.

His lawsuit to obtain justice names the Florida Governor, Attorney General, Supreme Court, Florida Bar, and others.

After ten years of devastation and professional and personal limbo, Corbin continues looking forward to his first day in court and the verdict of an impartial jury after the whole truth is made known.

YouTube Video :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5PAd4B_zVo ""

Source of Above
http://www.supremeabuse.com/overview.html

Disbar the Florida Bar. Time for Accountability from Florida Attorneys. Demand Integrity and that Florida Attorneys are NOT above the Law.

"As a Director of Baron’s Stores, Inc., I am responsible for assisting in the wind down following Baron’s liquidated Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

The Florida Bar, in my opinion, has engaged in criminal activity, which has interfered with my ability to fulfill my fiduciary responsibilities.

The alleged criminal activities include a breach of the following:

Honest Services
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Racketeering
Mail Fraud, and
Sherman Anti Trust


The Florida Bar is a mandatory organization of all lawyers who are licensed by the Supreme Court of Florida to practice law in the state. John Harkness, Esq., is the Executive Director of The Florida Bar. Mr. Harkness’ core function is to oversee the prosecution of unethical lawyers.

Mr. Harkness’ responsibilities conflict with his position as a Director on the Board of The Florida Bar’s created malpractice carrier, Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company. As a Director on the Board of the insurance company, Mr. Harkness’ duties include vigorously defending any attorney accused of ethical violations and legal malpractice, who are insured by FLMIC. Yet, Mr. Harkness has held these conflicted dual positions for more than a decade.

Earlier this year, I penned an OpEd piece for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel outlining what I had learned about the Florida Bar. The response from the community was overwhelming and immediate.

As a result of conversations with Florida lawyers, and insurance professionals, as well as my fiduciary responsibilities in having to deal with the courts, “Disbar The Florida Bar,” was born.

This non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation was formed to cause the removal of The Florida Bar as the controlling and regulatory entity for Florida lawyers and to re-create a level playing field for all Florida attorneys and their clients.

I am seeking input from others in the state of Florida
who feel that they have been wronged by The Florida Bar.

This input will be aired through live interviews on WZAB 880 AM Miami every weekday from 2:00 – 3:00 PM., thru Thursday, May 13, 2010. Call 305-773-5167 to discuss your experiences with the Florida Bar on the air.

The show will also host interviews with candidates vying for State offices, members of the Judiciary, Executive and Legislative branches, as well as Law Professors, Insurance Executives, and other professionals.

The objective is to educate the public about issues with The Florida Bar, both as a regulatory agency under The Supreme Court of Florida, and an Association/Union mandating membership in a Right to Work state. If you would like to be interviewed, please click the contact link.

We already have numerous attorneys lined up to come forward to tell their story of how The Florida Bar has used the disciplinary process against them while allowing unethical attorneys, insured by FLMIC, to go unpunished.

Hopefully, with enhanced public awareness, attorneys and elected officials will act to remove The Florida Bar and The Florida Bar’s connections from power. "

Link to Source of Post

http://www.disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=94

Click Here to Learn More About "Disbar the Florida Bar".

Have Tips On Florida Corruption?

Email Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox

at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Information on the Florida Bar, the Florida Supreme Court and Florida Attorneys that are Corrupt and helped to cover up a Trillion Stolen Patent of the Iviewit Technology Company ( Iviewit Invention, Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Company)
go to www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Time to Disbar the Florida Bar. STOP Criminal Activity Among the Florida Attorney Fraternity.

When is Enough really Enough?

The Florida Bar seems to constantly protect illegal activity among Florida Attorneys, to the point of a Trillion Dollar patent theft in which will soon take the investment portfolios of many shareholders of Warner Bros. , Intel, Time Warner Inc. , AOL and More involved in the Stealing of the Iviewit Technlogies Stolen Patent.

More on the Involvement of the Florida Courts and the Florida Bar in the aiding and abetting of stealing a Trillion Dollar Patent at: www.Iviewit.TV - www.DeniedPatent.com -

Time to STOP Corruption in the Florida Attorney Fraternity.

Time for Accountable among Florida Attorneys.

Click Here to Listen to Disbar the Florida Bar Radio Show

"" The Florida Bar is a mandatory organization of all lawyers who are licensed by the Supreme Court of Florida to practice law in the state.

John Harkness, Esq., is the Executive Director of The Florida Bar. Mr. Harkness’ core function is to oversee the prosecution of unethical lawyers.

Mr. Harkness’ responsibilities conflict with his position as a Director on the Board of The Florida Bar’s created malpractice carrier, Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company.

As a Director on the Board of the insurance company, Mr. Harkness’ duties include vigorously defending any attorney accused of ethical violations and legal malpractice, who are insured by FLMIC. Yet, Mr. Harkness has held these conflicted dual positions for more than a decade. ""

Other Links on
Iviewit Technologies and the Corrupt Florida Bar

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=the-florida-bar

http://miamimirror.blogspot.com/2010/01/formal-complaint-lodged-with-florida.html

http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies.html

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+%22florida+bar%22+%22iviewit%22&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/02/greenberg-traurig-openingly-stands-in.html

http://www.industrywhistleblower.tv/2010/02/list-of-parties-named-in-eliot.html

http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2009/12/iviewit-holdings-inc-conflict-of.html

http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/02/florida-bar-under-fire-for-lack-of.html

http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/response-to-why-data-compression-news.html

http://www.bankruptcytrusteefraud.com/2010/03/fbi-coverups-boca-police-scandals-major.html

Florida Bar Under Fire for Lack of Regulation in Robert Allen Stanford and Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme, Kenneth Marvin defendant in Iviewit Stolen...

""Florida Bar Under Fire for Lack of Regulation in Robert Allen Stanford and Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme, Kenneth Marvin defendant in Iviewit Multi Trillion Dollar Lawsuit

December 29th, 2009
Before reading the article below, one wonders if the Florida Bar has reported their status and liability in the Iviewit Multi Trillion Dollar Federal Lawsuit to State Auditors???

http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewnews.asp?id=30938&AuthorID=23453

David Arthur Walters

Contempt for The Florida Bar and Supreme Court

12/23/2009 9:26:00 AM

by David Arthur Walters

________________________________________

Commentary: Allen Sanford and Scott Rothstein should have been nailed in Florida long ago.

The Florida Bar and the Florida Supreme Court of which the Bar is part and parcel deserve an utterance of contempt for their failure to regulate powerful, politically connected law firms until damage to the public is irreparably done.

For example, Greenberg Traurig, some of whose lawyers were implicated in the Hamilton Bank and Allen Stanford scandals, the very firm whose name became infamous in the Abramoff political scandal.

But Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, the erstwhile South Florida legal powerhouse led by the now notorious swindler Scott Rothstein, is currently the most glaring example. Rothstein and his colleagues ran a Ponzi-scheme that bilked investors of over $1 billion under the mantle of the firm, using the firm’s letterhead and mingling some of the ill-gotten proceeds with the firm’s accounts while doling out millions of dollars for the benefit of his fine friend Governor Charlie Crist, former Senator Mel Martinez, Senator John McCain, presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, and the like.

The Rothstein firm hired former judges and a mayor, and Rothstein bought police protection from top law enforcement officials. Ironically, he sat on a Bar committee responsible for disciplining unethical conduct of lawyers.

Governor Crist appointed him to a judiciary nominating committee just after Rothstein contributed funds to his campaign and the Republican Party.

The Rothstein firm doled out huge bonuses to attorneys on the condition they contribute to designated candidates, a fact that could subject them to charges of fraud, money laundering and tax evasion.

Furthermore, Rothstein and his law associates created at least 30 shell corporations to launder money, shuffle acquired assets and conceal the identities of the corporate directors and officers involved in the illicit scheme.

Berger Singerman, the law firm handling Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler’s bankruptcy, filed a bankruptcy document stated that the books and records of Rothstein’s firm “are in disarray, inadequate and do not contain the typical records that one would expect to be maintained in the normal course of business.”

Frauds and other misconduct would undoubtedly be detected and Florida’s legal profession as well as the Bar spared a great deal of embarrassment and dishonor if the books of law firms were regularly examined by independent certified fraud examiners.

But Kenneth L. Marvin, Staff Counsel, Director of Lawyer Regulation for the Florida Bar did not respond to my suggestion to do just that, nor was he interested in law firms as such. Unless he was prevaricating, the Bar’s information system is wholly inadequate to the task of producing any information about the relationship of lawyers to their firms.

“We do not keep records pertaining to law firms, since law firms do not have a license to practice law,”

Marvin stated in on October 16, 2009 email, in response to my formal request for records appertaining to the involvement of the lawyers of the powerful, politically connected firm of Greenberg Traurig, a firm that has reportedly represented the Florida Bar.

In any event, a careful reader could infer from the widely published reports on the Allen Stanford scandal that Greenberg Traurig lawyers colluded with public regulators and lawyers for the State of Florida in setting up the specious trust that enabled Stanford to use his Miami office to launder most of the money he bilked from investors or laundered for others.

Banking lawyers were astonished by the trust arrangement, as it appeared contrary to banking law not to mention ethical standards - information as to whether or not any of them filed complaints or inquiries with the Bar as required by its Rules cannot be obtained from the Bar due to the policies that allows it to conceal information from immediate public view and destroy it in short order.

“Mr. Walters, I don’t understand why you are so distrustful of the Bar. I had never heard of the Stanford Trust until I read your writings about it,” Marvin stated. “I do not know who you originally spoke to, but we do keep our records under the accused attorney’s name and not the subject matter.

If you had asked me about the Stanford Trust, I would have claimed no knowledge, but if you had asked about Carlos Loumiet, I would have recognized that name and recalled that there were newspaper articles about him.”

Apparently neither Marvin nor anyone else at the Bar had carefully read the series of Miami Herald articles about the involvement of private and public lawyers in the forging of the Stanford Trust.

If a member of the public in want of a lawyer were referred to Carlos E. Loumiet, one of the principal lawyers accused in both the Hamilton Bank fraud and the Stanford Trust fraud, and if he checks the Bar’s website for public information, he will discover that, as of December 22, 2009, Loumiet is a member of the Bar in good standing and that there is no disciplinary history on him for the last 10 years.

Indeed, a recent press report described him as “a distinguished member of the Florida Bar.” In fact, a file was opened and recently closed on Loumiet in re the Hamilton Bank fraud, and another file has been opened on him in re the Stanford fraud. Both files are hidden from immediate public view so that the public will be kept in the dark about the investigations unless it makes a public records request about a specific attorney - in one instance, Bar staff denied the existence of a file until this writer insisted that a defense lawyer had publicly declared that disciplinary action was pending. If the Bar in its discretion decides not to pursue a matter or decides that discipline is unwarranted, the file is destroyed hence the Bar is left unaccountable for its actions.

“Mr. Marvin,” I responded to Marvin’s email, “Thank you very much for your revelation that The Florida Bar does not keep records appertaining to law firms. I believe I may fairly conclude from your statement that the Bar’s information system must be inadequate and in need of considerable improvement.

As it stands, the Bar staff apparently have no way, for example, of producing statistics to demonstrate that there is little or no merit in the widespread belief that the Bar favors large, powerful (i.e. politically connected) firms such as Greenberg Traurig, wherein it is alleged that the individual consciences are too easily submerged.

I would think that you and other persons charged with the regulation of the profession would find the organizations of practitioners as interesting as the individuals involved in them, and would make sure that information was kept on that aspect for several good reasons.”

Mr. Marvin also responded on behalf of the Executive Director of the Florida Bar and the Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court to my constructive suggestions for the improvement of information transparency. My letter included the following suggestion:

“I respectfully suggest that a list of Pending Complaints and Open Disciplinary Cases be maintained on the website and regularly updated until disposed of. Thereafter the initial and dispositive information would be maintained for 10 years on the respective website-available files of the attorneys involved.

By ‘Pending Complaints’ I mean each and every complaint received, and by ‘Open Disciplinary Cases’ I mean each and every complaint that Bar counsel decides to pursue. The information available would of course include the name of the attorney, the date and nature of the complaint and the current status of the investigation.

If a case is not opened or an investigation not conducted on the complaint, the disposition then posted to the attorney’s website-available file would state the specific reason for not investigating the complaint. When an open case is closed, the specific reason for disposition would likewise be posted to the attorney’s website-available file.

As for the confidentiality of open files, Rule 3-7.1 (e) allows for the disclosure of the status of specific cases under investigation. The specification under my suggestion would be any and all open files.”

“Please understand that I do not wish to argue with you and I do not set policy,” replied Mr. Marvin on October 27, 2009. Since he was responding for the Executive Director and Chief Justice, it appears that any constructive suggestions sent to the high authorities of the Florida integrated bar would fall on deaf ears since none of the above nor any delegates below “set policy.”

But Marvin informed me that suggestions could be made to a special citizen council controlled by the Bar; but then the Bar would have discretion over what measures if any to adopt.

The arrogance of a public institution that does not have to answer to the public and is a law unto itself is exceedingly dangerous to that public, and is deserving of its contempt.

To return to the Rothstein scandal, there is little doubt that several members of the legal community and more certainly colleagues at the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler itself knew about the scam or should have known that something was seriously amiss. Indeed, rumors were running rampant in legal circles as to the source of Rothstein’s sudden wealth and the enormous political influence of his legal powerhouse.

Lawyers had good reason to wonder where all the money was coming from so fast, for it would have been impossible for the law practice itself to generate such a fabulous fortune virtually overnight. U.S. Senator George LeMieux, a lawyer, former campaign manager and then chief of staff to Governor Crist (who are both now calling for an end to corruption in Florida), did not bother to look the gift horse in the mouth at the time of receipt.

He has now admitted that he did not understand where all the money was coming from, pleading that, “You don’t look at someone who’s generous and just criticize.”

Perhaps Gary Phillips at Rothstein’s previous firm, Phillips Eiseinger Koss Rosenfeldt and Rothstein, could have nipped the pathological liar in the bud some time ago, as Phillips and his partners got rid of Rothstein after discovering he had lied to a client about filing a complaint and a motion for injunctive relief; but Phillips decided not to report Rothstein to the Bar because he took the Bar’s job into his own hands and erroneously determined that lying to clients is not a legitimate grievance against a lawyer.

Bar rules require attorneys to blow the whistle on such misconduct; therefore I forwarded the information on Phillips to Marvin and asked whether the Bar would inquire into the matter. A smooth-talking staff lawyer called me on December 21, 2009 and said there was no file open on Phillips but one might be opened “at the discretion of the Bar.” If a citizen filed a sworn complaint against Phillips, I was informed, he or she would then have access to documents appertaining to the proceedings if any. The complainant could then reveal the information obtained - some states make such a revelation a contempt of court.

I pointed out that citizens might not like to go on record against attorneys for fear of retaliation. I recommended that an independent ombudsman be created to file such complaints based on information obtained from the press and interested members of the public.

The staff lawyer did not seem interested; why should he be when the integrated bar does not have to answer to the public for anything at all?

Of course the Bar would be far more effective if lawyers would only blow the whistle on one another as the Rules of the Bar do require, but a code of silence imposed from the top down of the Bar integrated with the Supreme Court renders them reluctant to do so, despite such ethical mouthing from the Bar as that of its ethical counsel, Elizabeth Tarbert, who recently effused that, even though lawyers may not have actual evidence of something amiss, they cannot bury their heads in the sand if knowledge of wrongdoing might be inferred from circumstances. Seldom are such inferences filed with the Bar, and the ones that Bar counsel and the Good Old Boys on the grievance committees give a free pass to are never brought to the public’s attention and all the evidence is destroyed a year later so that the Bar may not be brought to task for its prejudices, preferences, and negligence.

In any case, what humble lawyer would scruple to draw damning inferences in the form of complaints against the high power that provide not only his privilege to practice his profession but determine his relative success in courts? He might then find himself the defendant in disbarment proceedings presided over by the Good Old Boys he has begged askance of.

Indeed, disbarred attorney Mark A. Adams believes he was permanently disbarred from practicing law in Florida because he blew the whistle on members of a powerful, politically connected law firm, Battaglia Ross Dicus & Wein, P.A. He has in fact made numerous public statements alleging corruption of the Florida judiciary and the Attorney General’s office, and has accused specific attorneys of criminal conduct. He did file a complaint with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

The FDLE forwarded the file (FDLE File 73-5818-134-131) to Susan Austin at the Florida Bar on June 25, 2004. According to Adams, the Florida Bar, instead of pursuing the matter on its own initiative, as it is allowed to do by its own Rules, simply dismissed it on a technicality, that the complaint was not sworn by a complainant. The Florida Bar has been accused by watchdogs of routinely rat-holing numerous grievances against attorneys without inquiry; however that might be, evidence supporting Adam’s claim, that his complaints were ignored, is not retrievable from the Bar because of its record-destruction policy, a Supreme Court policy that creates an appearance of impropriety as it obviously would allow its strong “arm”, the Florida Bar, to behave irresponsibly since its deeds are rendered inscrutable.

I asked Adams if he had some concrete evidence of a quid pro quo between the Battaglia firm lawyers and the judicial officers regarding his allegations of criminal conduct.

“Battaglia and his clients were able to get a number of judges to ignore black letter law and the facts to deprive my former client of the pay that was due to him, to make my former client pay Battaglia’s client, and to enter a judgment against me and use a baseless criminal charge to attempt to extort money from me.

That’s explains the benefits to Battaglia. Regarding the evidence of the benefit to the judges, why would judges ignore the law and the facts and expose themselves to liability unless they were receiving a benefit?”

That is a good question, one that should have been thoroughly investigated by the Florida Bar. We are left to speculate, that the judges could be ignorant, or they could believe they are above the law for some reason or another, say, answering a higher call, or they could be getting definite benefits - favors, payoffs et cetera. Concrete evidence of the latter would of course definitely interest Federal investigators who are not subject to the powerful machinations of the integrated state bar and bench.

In Rothstein’s case almost everyone knew or suspected that something was seriously amiss, but nobody was willing to draw derogatory inferences until federal authorities swooped in to end the colossal fraud. And then not a single competent member of the legal circle was surprised, for the fall of Rothstein & Firm was not a matter of if but of when, so obvious had the likelihood of fraud become.

Now the general public has some reason to assume, from all the evidence brought forward and the allegations being made, that the integrated bar of Florida is a legally constituted racketeering organization. Therefore an historical recapitulation of the monstrosity called the “integrated bar” is in order:

During the Great Depression, Americans were once again sorely plagued by hordes of lawyers, wherefore they were apt to raise once again the revolutionary cry, “Kill the lawyers! Burn down the courthouses!”

The high courts of several states, in a supreme exercise of judicial vanity, circled wagons and gazed into their self-flattering mirrors, each reflecting the mutual opinion that supreme courts possess an inherent and absolute power to regulate the practice of law in their respective states without interference from the legislative or executive branches of government.

A strong jurisprudential argument was made that only an organization of lawyers dominated by a supreme court are competent to regulate lawyers given the complexity of the law and its practice and the native tendency of litigious lawyers to independent and relativistic thinking. Therefore all lawyers who want to practice should be integrated into a state supreme court system so that the court might adopt and enforce standard scruples thus effectively curb the abuses people were suffering at the hands of unscrupulous lawyers - Plato’s Socrates might argue that lawyers are unscrupulous sophists by virtue of their trade.



In Florida, the “integrated bar” concept was embraced and eventually enshrined in the state constitution by way of amendment. But not all states bought the integrated bar movement - independent-minded lawyers were naturally opposed to paying dues and being beholden for their livelihood to a ruling hierarchy of their own disparaged kind. Naturally, there are many opposing arguments to an integrated bar.

The absolute integration of bench and bar would belie the very independence from political influence that the judiciary is wont to brag about as its chief virtue when claiming that it protects people from legislative politics. An integrated bar would allow the same forces that rule lawyer-dominated legislatures to rule the judiciary as well, with impunity and without debate from an opposition.

Politics is the distribution of power, and the integrated bar, having arrogated to itself the sole power to regulate the most powerful profession pursuant to the prejudices of the dominating political power of its members, would become a virtually unregulated power.

There could be no genuine “integrity” in such an integrated bar, no virtue except traditional loyalty to one’s own kind or else. There could be no real balance of powers here. Surely an absolutely independent integrated bar would tend to the absolute corruption of every state in which it is institutionalized. Such an institution would deserve the unmitigated contempt of a democratic people if only the people fully understood its nature.

That understanding has not been advanced by the so-called fourth branch of government, the press. A well seasoned investigative reporter with the McClatchy newspaper organization informed this commentator that integrated bar organizations routinely ignore the transgressions of powerful law firms while diligently pressing complaints against small practitioners, who are easily intimidated by the prospect of losing their livelihood.

This, in effect, keeps the rank-and-file in line with the ruling political power. We seldom or never see a critical report from the mainstream media addressing the Bar’s favoritism and negligence, which appears to rise to a fraud on the public. Instead, the public is fed pabulum, a steady diet of press releases praising the Bar’s good works, much of it well deserved, and an occasional press release notifying the public that a few small fry have been disciplined. Once in awhile a big fish is fried by the Bar, after he has been caught by law enforcement and convicted.

The so-called fourth branch of government, the press, ignores the crucial, political point, obscured by the gospel, as it were, or at least the true perspective is never published. After all, notwithstanding the public’s low albeit envious regard for lawyers as a class, it is difficult to elucidate such an obscured subject as the “integrated bar” so that a clamor might be raised against its inherent conflict of interest and organizational hypocrisy.

Furthermore, since the Bar integrated with the Supreme Court is in effect an arm or organ of the Court, since it is thus a law unto itself lorded over by its presiding power, nothing short of a clamor to kill lawyers and burn down courthouses could cause it to mitigate its arrogance and effect the radical reform needed, the disintegration of the integrated bar. Finally, the press is not wont to alienate the hand that feeds it with choice information and free-speech rulings.



Yet disintegration of the integrated bar is still possible, as is evidenced by England’s Legal Services Act of 2007, which mandated the end of the legal profession’s self-regulation and separated its regulation from its self-interested representative or political function. The Legal Services Board was appointed on September 1, 2008 pursuant to the Act, and it will be the single independent oversight regulator of legal services in England.

The Board will supervise all licensing authorities and oversee lawyer regulation. It is appointed entirely by the government. Most of the appointees are non-lawyers chosen for their regulatory and other public affairs experience, and some are consumer advocates. An Office of Legal Complaints will be established and monitored by the Board, completely independent of the profession, and will deal with consumer complaints according to an ombudsman scheme. The Complaints Commissioner must be a non-lawyer.

Much more can and should be said on this subject. The Florida’s integrated bar does deserve a great deal of credit for its many good deeds, but until significant and radical reform of the regulatory function is obtained, its pollution by political factions will create at least the appearance of impropriety, and its negligence alone deserves the public utterance of contempt.""

Source of post and More information Below
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=254

Greenberg Traurig Openingly Stands in Conflict of Interest, Yet Represents the Florida State Bar as If They are On the Right Side of the Law.

Greenberg Traurig is above the Law, Above Ethics and who cares, Attorneys have all the power and the justice system seems to have no real need for the Truth.

Greenberg Traurig represents the Florida Bar right? as in Toady's Headlines where Jesse Diner claims ONE BAD APPLE.. .. to funny .. but yes he had the Balls to Say it...

Greenberg Traurig seems to be Behind a whole lot of Evil Goin' on Down there in the State of Florida.

Greenberg Traurig is friends of Abramoff Right? And Greenberg Traurig has a bit to do with the Stanford scandal Right?

And Come on How Blatant Can you Get about your Total Disregard for the "Conflict of Interest Thing" When Greenberg Traurig Represented Iviewit somehow right?

I mean didn't Greenberg Traurig do a patent review for the Iviewit Technology Company as retained counsel and then in a Blatant Above the Law and in Total dis-Regard of Conflicts of Interest and Attorney Ethics they turned around and then Represented the Florida State Bar against the Iviewit Company, Hmmmm..

this stuff is So Blatant and So Obvious.

That there is No Way you could ever wonder if the State of Florida holds attorneys accountable, Holds Attorneys to ANY kind of ethics, the Florida State Bar does NOT care about conflicts of interest... it is all about protecting their own asses and We the People, Who Cares About them?

Greenberg Traurig is not accountable for Conflicts of Interest so No Wonder the Florida State Bar is NOT accountable and no Wonder Jesse Diner thinks there is only "one Rotten apple"...

Florida State Bar, Greenberg Traurig