"they better have a big ol' fat file"
Click Here for More Videos / Voice on Iviewit
for More on the iViewit Technology Go to
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.iViewit.TV
Showing posts with label Eliot Bernstein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eliot Bernstein. Show all posts
Monday, October 25, 2010
Friday, September 3, 2010
Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Technologies Notifies Governor Charlie Crist of Florida Corruption at Suggestion of Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum
Eliot Bernstein Notifies Florida Governor of Massive Florida Corruption at the Suggestion of Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum.
" Friday, September 03, 2010
Hon. Governor Charlie Crist
Office of Governor Charlie Crist
State of Florida
Dear Honorable Governor Charlie Crist,
Per the Attorney General of the Great State of Florida, I write to you for inclusion into the ongoing Nineteenth Statewide Grand Jury, the Eliot Bernstein and Iviewit companies claims of criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities by certain members of the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar, the Boca Raton P.D., the law firms Proskauer Rose LLP, Foley & Lardner LLP and more.
The extent of these claims of Public Office Corruption reach the highest levels of Florida government and thus are germane to the Grand Jury’s request for information and stated purpose, “The Office of Statewide Prosecution has established a public corruption hotline for anyone who believes they have information concerning a criminal offense involving public corruption or wishes to suggest issues the Statewide Grand Jury should investigate regarding public corruption.
Below is a communication from Attorney General McCollum in response to my request to his offices for inclusion, whereby he urges me to contact and join your offices of these most serious allegations as well.
I am contacting your offices again, as I have contacted them in the past regarding these matters and am asking that your offices take all actions necessary to have these allegations investigated by the Florida Grand Jury your office has convened, as well as, any other criminal actions you may deem appropriate in investigating these matters and notifying the proper authorities of the allegations alleged herein and in the URL links provided herein.
I am happy to provide additional information or testimony relating to the matters to any investigators you deem appropriate or before the Grand Jury.
Many of these matters have crossed state lines through the law firms accused and in New York, a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq. has identified a Racketeering type organization within not only the NY Courts and NY Disciplinary Agencies but the NY prosecutorial offices, including the US Attorney, the NY Attorney General Cuomo’s offices and the NY District Attorneys Office.
The allegations rise to senior members of these public offices acting in conspiracy to deprive due process to citizens’ complaints against them and in fact, a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein of the NY Supreme Court was allegedly according to Anderson Whitewashing attorney complaints for these prosecutors. In addition, Anderson claims “favored lawyers and law firms” had their complaints cleaned as well.
The Anderson case now also involves Federal Obstruction of Justice in a federal Lawsuit, with death threats on Federal Witnesses on their way to testify in Federal Court. Extortion of state employees is also evidenced in Anderson, replete with physical assaults on the 60 yr. female Anderson, to either aid and abet or else by Senior New York Supreme Court Officials.
My Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit filed alongside and in support of Anderson’s Historic and Heroic Whistleblower claims, was legally “related” to the Anderson Whistleblower lawsuit by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin.
Many of the defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST are located here in Florida, in fact all of my claims began in Florida, as that is where my companies and myself were located at the time the criminal activities were first discovered.
Proskauer partners were ordered for Investigation for Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public office by the New York Supreme Court, in a unanimous consent of five justices of that court but those investigations are now under investigation for their failure to investigate.
The allegations in NY are almost identical to those I filed in Florida just different players from the same firms often having infiltrated and violated public offices to deny due process to my complaints in violation of law and attorney and judicial conduct codes.
All of my complaints in Florida in the courts and to all state agencies are herein officially requested to be re-opened in light of the revelations of new and damning information revealed in Anderson and new evidence against certain defendants in my lawsuit from Florida.
New evidence includes Defendant Proskauer Rose LLP and Partner Thomas Sjoblom’s involvement in the ExSir Robert Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme, Sjoblom found aiding and abetting Stanford Employees in a Miami Airport Hanger teaching them how to lie to SEC and FBI investigators.
As you know, Proskauer has been sued in a Global Class Action for the entire damages of Stanford, approximately 7 Billion US Dollars. Another thread to Florida is another Defendant in my Fed RICO, now infamous Ponzi schemer, Marc S. Dreier, Esq., who has been sentenced to 20 years for his Ponzi scheme.
Greenberg Traurig law firm, who represents the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court in my Fed RICO, acting in conflict as Greenberg Traurig was also former Patent Counsel for my companies and myself, where Greenberg has recently been alleged running a large Ponzi scheme in Florida, more information below. A link too many of the Florida specific crimes can be found at
http://iviewit.tv/supreme%20court/index.htm
and
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/oneofthesedays/index.htm
Complaints filed in Florida with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court are requested to be re-opened by your offices with oversight by your offices to mitigate any further conflicts of interest and violations of Public Offices and law.
Complaints filed with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court against, Florida Bar employees, Florida Supreme Court Public Officials, Proskauer Partners Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq. who was convicted of Felony DUI with Injury in Florida and Matthew Triggs who violated Florida Bar Rules in handling Complaints in multiple conflicts and violation of public office of the Florida Bar, are also being requested herein to have formal investigations into the matters reheard entirely based on a plethora of new information and evidence against the defendants in those matters and again instituted with oversight of your offices.
Similarly, we are requesting that your offices investigate the Florida Civil Court Case Civil Case No. 502001CA004671XXCDAB with new evidence showing a complete fraud on the court was orchestrated by Proskauer and Judge Jorge Labarga of the Florida Supreme Court, prior to your appointment of Labarga to the Florida Supreme Court.
I also note that members of your inner staff are formerly with Defendant Foley & Lardner, who acted as Solicitor General to the Florida Supreme Court while my complaints were being reviewed by that Court.
I also note that Justice Jorge Labarga and several of the Florida Supreme Court Justice and Court Officials are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit. I also note that several members or former members of the Florida Bar are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit.
Therefore, I request further that your offices in handling these matters proceed with extreme caution in ferreting out ALL Conflicts of Interest prior to involvement by any party, to preclude further possible charges against members of your office or any other party your offices join into these matters.
I have attached a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for all parties, including yourself, to sign and return to my office at 2753 NW 34th St. Boca Raton, FL 33434, prior to ANY Actions you take in even considering the matter.
As a mass of Conflicts of Interest have been discovered in these matters already and the Whistleblower further identifying a criminal conspiracy within state agencies, this Conflict form is essential to ensuring fair and impartial due process of law by non conflicted parties. Any conflicts identified may be considered based on full disclosure and agreement by ALL parties involved or new non conflicted parties must be retained prior to disclosure of even the most basic information.
As these matters in New York and Florida are against some of the highest ranking officials in the states, I know that in New York Anderson and now other related cases and witnesses who testified to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee are seeking various forms of witness protection, I similarly would like to know what options for this type of protection are available to those who come forward in Florida.
As a car bombing victim of the RICO Criminal Enterprise, described in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit I feel that certain protections should already have been availed, in fact, I petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for such once already and this Motion is located at the URL
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004_10_07_Supreme_Court_Florida_Motion_Final_Cert_Signed.pdf
as well as, repeated requests since it was determined by Florida Fire Investigator Rick Lee that accelerants’ were the cause of the explosion that blew up three cars next to it, in Boynton Beach Florida. Despite repeated notice to Florida Law Enforcement, as you can see from the previous link they too were involved in the second act that protection from the court was requested for and therefore have never investigated these matters through public office corruption after public office corruption after public office corruption as defined herein and in the attached URL’s.
Please make all exhibits and links fully incorporated by reference herein into this letter for formal docketing in the Florida Grand Jury Request of Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Companies, each URL may have several URL’s, also hereby incorporated entirely by reference herein and for further use by the Grand Jury.
As Whistleblower Anderson in a sworn statement has claimed that she witnessed document destruction of investigatory files first hand (Anderson’s Statement to the New York Judiciary Committee attached below), please print each and every url in entirety for inclusion into this document and due to the fact that these matters pertain to US Patent Rights of an inventor, please retain these files and information for a period of no less than 20 yrs.
There are over a thousand documents at the URL http://www.iviewit.tv/ on the homepage under the Evidence Section on the homepage for your review and for docketing with the complaints and for review by investigators or Grand Jurors.
Despite whether the Florida Grand Jury investigates these most serious allegations of corruption at the highest levels of Florida Government, let this letter also serve as a formal request that your offices begin all necessary notices and/or investigations and notify all investigatory bodies necessary to investigate all those persons named in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit from Florida and notify them of the new evidence and requests for an entire review of all prior actions by any Florida Agency listed herein or in the URL’s embedded herein.
Please formally notify the following offices of this submission, including but not limited to, the Florida Inspector General (copied herein), the Florida US Attorney, the necessary Florida District Attorneys and the Florida Attorney General of the allegations and information contained herein, please have all parties sign prior to acceptance of ANY materials a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, again prior to ANY actions or decisions being rendered or transfer of any confidential information.
Please take this communication as both a request to join the 19th Florida Grand Jury and Request for Formal Investigations of all of the following Florida Defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST by the Florida Governor and Florida Attorney General’s offices, please docket a separate complaint for each Florida organization and individual listed below;
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual
capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and
individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer,
ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional
and individual capacities,AMENDED
DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his COMPLAINT
professional and individual capacities,
GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
DAVID GEORGE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GREGG REED, in his professional
and individual capacities,
LEON GOLD, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STUART KAPP, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRIS WOLF, in his professional
and individual capacities,
JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional
and individual capacities,
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STATE OF FLORIDA,
OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR FLORIDA,
HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities,
THE FLORIDA BAR,
JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON in her official
and individual capacities,
LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her
official and individual capacities,
ERIC TURNER in his official and individual
capacities,
KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual
capacities,
JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual
capacities,
JERALD BEER in his official and individual
capacities,BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,
HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and
individual capacities
HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and
individual capacities,
THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual
capacities,
DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and
individual capacities,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA,
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.
BOCA RATON Police Department
ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and
individual capacities,
ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual
capacities,
CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC.,
ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP,
STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional
and individual capacities,
ERIC CHEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
AVI HERSH, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional
and individual capacities,
BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC.,
ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional
and individual capacities,
HOUSTON & SHAHADY, P.A., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities,
SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities,
KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,
ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, "
******
Above Letter From Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Technologies Founder and Main Inventor to Florida's Governor Charlie Crist ... AGAIN... What will Governor Charlie Crist of Florida do with this Knowing of Blatant and Widespread Corruption This Time ??
I will Let You Know.
In My Opinion, if Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum and if Governor Charlie Crist IGNORES this information, Well Time for a RICO Lawsuit, a Whistleblower Lawsuit AGAINST the STATE of FLORIDA for aiding and abetting Massive Shareholder Fraud, Major Crime and Corruption, Government Corruption and for Hiding Secrets that will Cost Taxpayers - Investors - Shareholders BILLIONS of Dollars.
More on the Massive Corruption in Florida
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
got a Tip on Corruption in Florida,
or on Bill McCollum Florida Attorney General,
Or On Governor Charlie Crist ??
eMail me
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
" Friday, September 03, 2010
Hon. Governor Charlie Crist
Office of Governor Charlie Crist
State of Florida
Dear Honorable Governor Charlie Crist,
Per the Attorney General of the Great State of Florida, I write to you for inclusion into the ongoing Nineteenth Statewide Grand Jury, the Eliot Bernstein and Iviewit companies claims of criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities by certain members of the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar, the Boca Raton P.D., the law firms Proskauer Rose LLP, Foley & Lardner LLP and more.
The extent of these claims of Public Office Corruption reach the highest levels of Florida government and thus are germane to the Grand Jury’s request for information and stated purpose, “The Office of Statewide Prosecution has established a public corruption hotline for anyone who believes they have information concerning a criminal offense involving public corruption or wishes to suggest issues the Statewide Grand Jury should investigate regarding public corruption.
Below is a communication from Attorney General McCollum in response to my request to his offices for inclusion, whereby he urges me to contact and join your offices of these most serious allegations as well.
I am contacting your offices again, as I have contacted them in the past regarding these matters and am asking that your offices take all actions necessary to have these allegations investigated by the Florida Grand Jury your office has convened, as well as, any other criminal actions you may deem appropriate in investigating these matters and notifying the proper authorities of the allegations alleged herein and in the URL links provided herein.
I am happy to provide additional information or testimony relating to the matters to any investigators you deem appropriate or before the Grand Jury.
Many of these matters have crossed state lines through the law firms accused and in New York, a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq. has identified a Racketeering type organization within not only the NY Courts and NY Disciplinary Agencies but the NY prosecutorial offices, including the US Attorney, the NY Attorney General Cuomo’s offices and the NY District Attorneys Office.
The allegations rise to senior members of these public offices acting in conspiracy to deprive due process to citizens’ complaints against them and in fact, a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein of the NY Supreme Court was allegedly according to Anderson Whitewashing attorney complaints for these prosecutors. In addition, Anderson claims “favored lawyers and law firms” had their complaints cleaned as well.
The Anderson case now also involves Federal Obstruction of Justice in a federal Lawsuit, with death threats on Federal Witnesses on their way to testify in Federal Court. Extortion of state employees is also evidenced in Anderson, replete with physical assaults on the 60 yr. female Anderson, to either aid and abet or else by Senior New York Supreme Court Officials.
My Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit filed alongside and in support of Anderson’s Historic and Heroic Whistleblower claims, was legally “related” to the Anderson Whistleblower lawsuit by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin.
Many of the defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST are located here in Florida, in fact all of my claims began in Florida, as that is where my companies and myself were located at the time the criminal activities were first discovered.
Proskauer partners were ordered for Investigation for Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public office by the New York Supreme Court, in a unanimous consent of five justices of that court but those investigations are now under investigation for their failure to investigate.
The allegations in NY are almost identical to those I filed in Florida just different players from the same firms often having infiltrated and violated public offices to deny due process to my complaints in violation of law and attorney and judicial conduct codes.
All of my complaints in Florida in the courts and to all state agencies are herein officially requested to be re-opened in light of the revelations of new and damning information revealed in Anderson and new evidence against certain defendants in my lawsuit from Florida.
New evidence includes Defendant Proskauer Rose LLP and Partner Thomas Sjoblom’s involvement in the ExSir Robert Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme, Sjoblom found aiding and abetting Stanford Employees in a Miami Airport Hanger teaching them how to lie to SEC and FBI investigators.
As you know, Proskauer has been sued in a Global Class Action for the entire damages of Stanford, approximately 7 Billion US Dollars. Another thread to Florida is another Defendant in my Fed RICO, now infamous Ponzi schemer, Marc S. Dreier, Esq., who has been sentenced to 20 years for his Ponzi scheme.
Greenberg Traurig law firm, who represents the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court in my Fed RICO, acting in conflict as Greenberg Traurig was also former Patent Counsel for my companies and myself, where Greenberg has recently been alleged running a large Ponzi scheme in Florida, more information below. A link too many of the Florida specific crimes can be found at
http://iviewit.tv/supreme%20court/index.htm
and
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/oneofthesedays/index.htm
Complaints filed in Florida with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court are requested to be re-opened by your offices with oversight by your offices to mitigate any further conflicts of interest and violations of Public Offices and law.
Complaints filed with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court against, Florida Bar employees, Florida Supreme Court Public Officials, Proskauer Partners Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq. who was convicted of Felony DUI with Injury in Florida and Matthew Triggs who violated Florida Bar Rules in handling Complaints in multiple conflicts and violation of public office of the Florida Bar, are also being requested herein to have formal investigations into the matters reheard entirely based on a plethora of new information and evidence against the defendants in those matters and again instituted with oversight of your offices.
Similarly, we are requesting that your offices investigate the Florida Civil Court Case Civil Case No. 502001CA004671XXCDAB with new evidence showing a complete fraud on the court was orchestrated by Proskauer and Judge Jorge Labarga of the Florida Supreme Court, prior to your appointment of Labarga to the Florida Supreme Court.
I also note that members of your inner staff are formerly with Defendant Foley & Lardner, who acted as Solicitor General to the Florida Supreme Court while my complaints were being reviewed by that Court.
I also note that Justice Jorge Labarga and several of the Florida Supreme Court Justice and Court Officials are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit. I also note that several members or former members of the Florida Bar are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit.
Therefore, I request further that your offices in handling these matters proceed with extreme caution in ferreting out ALL Conflicts of Interest prior to involvement by any party, to preclude further possible charges against members of your office or any other party your offices join into these matters.
I have attached a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for all parties, including yourself, to sign and return to my office at 2753 NW 34th St. Boca Raton, FL 33434, prior to ANY Actions you take in even considering the matter.
As a mass of Conflicts of Interest have been discovered in these matters already and the Whistleblower further identifying a criminal conspiracy within state agencies, this Conflict form is essential to ensuring fair and impartial due process of law by non conflicted parties. Any conflicts identified may be considered based on full disclosure and agreement by ALL parties involved or new non conflicted parties must be retained prior to disclosure of even the most basic information.
As these matters in New York and Florida are against some of the highest ranking officials in the states, I know that in New York Anderson and now other related cases and witnesses who testified to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee are seeking various forms of witness protection, I similarly would like to know what options for this type of protection are available to those who come forward in Florida.
As a car bombing victim of the RICO Criminal Enterprise, described in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit I feel that certain protections should already have been availed, in fact, I petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for such once already and this Motion is located at the URL
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004_10_07_Supreme_Court_Florida_Motion_Final_Cert_Signed.pdf
as well as, repeated requests since it was determined by Florida Fire Investigator Rick Lee that accelerants’ were the cause of the explosion that blew up three cars next to it, in Boynton Beach Florida. Despite repeated notice to Florida Law Enforcement, as you can see from the previous link they too were involved in the second act that protection from the court was requested for and therefore have never investigated these matters through public office corruption after public office corruption after public office corruption as defined herein and in the attached URL’s.
Please make all exhibits and links fully incorporated by reference herein into this letter for formal docketing in the Florida Grand Jury Request of Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Companies, each URL may have several URL’s, also hereby incorporated entirely by reference herein and for further use by the Grand Jury.
As Whistleblower Anderson in a sworn statement has claimed that she witnessed document destruction of investigatory files first hand (Anderson’s Statement to the New York Judiciary Committee attached below), please print each and every url in entirety for inclusion into this document and due to the fact that these matters pertain to US Patent Rights of an inventor, please retain these files and information for a period of no less than 20 yrs.
There are over a thousand documents at the URL http://www.iviewit.tv/ on the homepage under the Evidence Section on the homepage for your review and for docketing with the complaints and for review by investigators or Grand Jurors.
Despite whether the Florida Grand Jury investigates these most serious allegations of corruption at the highest levels of Florida Government, let this letter also serve as a formal request that your offices begin all necessary notices and/or investigations and notify all investigatory bodies necessary to investigate all those persons named in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit from Florida and notify them of the new evidence and requests for an entire review of all prior actions by any Florida Agency listed herein or in the URL’s embedded herein.
Please formally notify the following offices of this submission, including but not limited to, the Florida Inspector General (copied herein), the Florida US Attorney, the necessary Florida District Attorneys and the Florida Attorney General of the allegations and information contained herein, please have all parties sign prior to acceptance of ANY materials a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, again prior to ANY actions or decisions being rendered or transfer of any confidential information.
Please take this communication as both a request to join the 19th Florida Grand Jury and Request for Formal Investigations of all of the following Florida Defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST by the Florida Governor and Florida Attorney General’s offices, please docket a separate complaint for each Florida organization and individual listed below;
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual
capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and
individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer,
ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional
and individual capacities,AMENDED
DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his COMPLAINT
professional and individual capacities,
GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
DAVID GEORGE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GREGG REED, in his professional
and individual capacities,
LEON GOLD, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STUART KAPP, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRIS WOLF, in his professional
and individual capacities,
JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional
and individual capacities,
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STATE OF FLORIDA,
OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR FLORIDA,
HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities,
THE FLORIDA BAR,
JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON in her official
and individual capacities,
LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her
official and individual capacities,
ERIC TURNER in his official and individual
capacities,
KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual
capacities,
JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual
capacities,
JERALD BEER in his official and individual
capacities,BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,
HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and
individual capacities
HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and
individual capacities,
THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual
capacities,
DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and
individual capacities,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA,
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.
BOCA RATON Police Department
ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and
individual capacities,
ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual
capacities,
CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC.,
ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP,
STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional
and individual capacities,
ERIC CHEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
AVI HERSH, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional
and individual capacities,
BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC.,
ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional
and individual capacities,
HOUSTON & SHAHADY, P.A., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities,
SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities,
KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,
ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, "
******
Above Letter From Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Technologies Founder and Main Inventor to Florida's Governor Charlie Crist ... AGAIN... What will Governor Charlie Crist of Florida do with this Knowing of Blatant and Widespread Corruption This Time ??
I will Let You Know.
In My Opinion, if Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum and if Governor Charlie Crist IGNORES this information, Well Time for a RICO Lawsuit, a Whistleblower Lawsuit AGAINST the STATE of FLORIDA for aiding and abetting Massive Shareholder Fraud, Major Crime and Corruption, Government Corruption and for Hiding Secrets that will Cost Taxpayers - Investors - Shareholders BILLIONS of Dollars.
More on the Massive Corruption in Florida
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
got a Tip on Corruption in Florida,
or on Bill McCollum Florida Attorney General,
Or On Governor Charlie Crist ??
eMail me
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Thursday, September 2, 2010
So What Does Bill McCollum Florida Attorney General have to Say About Blatant and Rampant Florida Corruption?
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum Notified
of Rampant, Blatant Corruption in the Florida Courts.
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum CANNOT say that he does not know.
So Does Florida Attorney General Bill MCollum stand with the PROVEN victims of Massive Florida Corruption or Does Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum stand with the Criminals, Attorneys, Judges, Supreme Court, and others Conspiring in the Corruption in Florida.
There is Radio shows to Disbar the Florida Bar, there is Complaints Constantly.
How Long Can this go on ? The Following is Notification to the Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum on Just How bad the Corruption in the State of Florida REALLY Is.
" Dear Honorable Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, I have received your response regarding my submission and appreciate your interest in the matter.
Due to the number of conflicts already existing in these matters and with members of this Committee Defendants in my ongoing Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit in New York that has been Legally related to a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Lawsuit exposing a mass of conflicts in public offices and Title 18 Obstruction.
I hereby request that all members of this Grand Jury Committee, including your offices, provide a formal signed and Verified Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, in advance of handling ANY of the materials submitted, forming any opinions, dismissing the matters or any other action that may affect the outcome of these matters before the Committee.
I am providing herein a Conflict of Interest Disclosure form, please print, sign, and return for all individuals who handle this most confidential information in any way, again prior to any actions involving these matters.
If you would like to discuss the Conflict of Interest Disclosure, please feel free to contact me.
Full Document Below. It is Interactive You Can Make it Bigger.
you can Download it.. Bill McCollum, Florida Attorney General
is WELL aware of Florida Corruption.
Florida Corruption Exposed
Say No to Florida Corruption
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology and
the Involvement of Florida Corrupt Courts
www.Iviewit.TV
www.JorgeLabarga.com
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.ChristopherCWheeler.com
of Rampant, Blatant Corruption in the Florida Courts.
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum CANNOT say that he does not know.
So Does Florida Attorney General Bill MCollum stand with the PROVEN victims of Massive Florida Corruption or Does Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum stand with the Criminals, Attorneys, Judges, Supreme Court, and others Conspiring in the Corruption in Florida.
There is Radio shows to Disbar the Florida Bar, there is Complaints Constantly.
How Long Can this go on ? The Following is Notification to the Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum on Just How bad the Corruption in the State of Florida REALLY Is.
" Dear Honorable Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, I have received your response regarding my submission and appreciate your interest in the matter.
Due to the number of conflicts already existing in these matters and with members of this Committee Defendants in my ongoing Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit in New York that has been Legally related to a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Lawsuit exposing a mass of conflicts in public offices and Title 18 Obstruction.
I hereby request that all members of this Grand Jury Committee, including your offices, provide a formal signed and Verified Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, in advance of handling ANY of the materials submitted, forming any opinions, dismissing the matters or any other action that may affect the outcome of these matters before the Committee.
I am providing herein a Conflict of Interest Disclosure form, please print, sign, and return for all individuals who handle this most confidential information in any way, again prior to any actions involving these matters.
If you would like to discuss the Conflict of Interest Disclosure, please feel free to contact me.
Full Document Below. It is Interactive You Can Make it Bigger.
you can Download it.. Bill McCollum, Florida Attorney General
is WELL aware of Florida Corruption.
Florida Corruption Exposed
Say No to Florida Corruption
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology and
the Involvement of Florida Corrupt Courts
www.Iviewit.TV
www.JorgeLabarga.com
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.ChristopherCWheeler.com
Wall of Corruption in Florida - Will the Attorney General Listen to Public Outcry?
INTERNET MESSAGE RECEIVED BY
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE ON 08/21/2010
RE: Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig, FL Suprem Court
Justices, Florida Bar and more
Subject: Public Corruption Grand Jury
I have spoken at the NY Senate Judiciary Committee who is holding hearings on Court Corruption in NY related to the NY Supreme Court Whistleblower case listd below
My RICO and Antitrust, involving many FL attorneys and
Judges is lated to the Whistleblower Lawsuit.
Florida Supreme Court & Florida Bar sued in Trillion Dollar Federal RICO &
ANTITRUST LAWSUIT - Radio Interview Inventor Eliot Bernstein on Les
Winston's bar the Florida Bar Iviewit Technologies Inventor, Eliot Bernstein, Interviews with Disbar the
Florida Bar’s Radio Host Les Winston ~ The Biz 880am regarding Trillion
Dollar Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit against Florida Bar, FL Supreme Court,
Justice orge Labarga, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig & more.
Lawsuit Legally “Related” to NY Supreme Court Whistleblower, Christine C.
Anderson who reveals an attorney complaint case fixer “Cleaner”, Naomi
Goldstein at NY Ethics Dept which regulates WallStreet.
Press Release Distributed @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-inventor-eliot-bernstein-interview-with-disbar-the-florida-bar-les-winston-the-biz-880am-regarding-trillion-dollar-fed-rico-suit-against-flo-1276897073.html
or online interactive version
@ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=315
Disbar the Florida Bar Radio Host Les Winston interviews Iviewit Tech
Inventor Eliot Bernstein regarding illegal activities at the Florida Supreme Court,
Florida Bar & Judge Jorge Labarga.LISTEN TO INTERVIEW @
http://disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=96
orhttp://www.iviewit.tv/DisbarFloridaBar23.mp3
World-renowned Inventor of Digital Video & Imaging Mathematical Scaling Formulas, Eliot Bernstein discusses with radio talk show host Les Winston f Disbar the Florida Bar his Trillion Dollar Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, naming the Florida Bar, Florida Supreme Court & Labarga as Defendants.
The it marked “legally” related by Judge Shira Scheindlin to a NY Whistleblower suit filed by a Supreme Court of NY Staff Attorney, Christine C. Anderson,
Esq. Bernstein’s Amended Complaint @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf
Anderson alleges the NY Attorney Disciplinary Dept, responsible for the oversight of WallStreet lawyers, has been whitewashing and cleaning disciplinary complaints against attorneys, including US Attorney’s, DA’s & ADA’s. Anderson named a “Cleaner” from the Ethics Dept of the NY Supreme Court, Naomi Goldstein, supervisor at the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
No wonder WallStreet melted down & attorney regulators go unpunished for failures after causing massive damage to the American People, only to then leave government positions or cushy law firm partnerships. Anderson claimed staff attorney, Nicole orrado Esq., on her way to testify at deposition supporting Anderson’s suit was threatened & intimated by a Sr. Court Official regarding giving estimony, creating Federal Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering & more by Court Officials.
Bernstein suing the FL & NY Supreme Courts, State Bars & Disciplinary
Agencies, claims conflicted members of the courts, partners from Proskauer Rose LLP
law firm, the main conspirator in Bernstein’s case along with law firm Foley &
Lardner, illegally handled complaints against partners while holding
official title with the courts & disciplinary agencies. In NY, Bernstein’s
allegations led to unanimous consent of 5 justice of the NY Supreme Court to have
former NY State Bar Association President, Steven Krane, a Proskauer partner,
ordered for investigation for conflicts & the appearance of impropriety. Proskauer’s
Kenneth Rubenstein, the sole (soulless) patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC,
ordered for investigation along with attorney Raymond Joao, who claims to
have put 90+ patents into his own name. Bernstein claims patents filed by Joao
were during & after the time Iviewit retained Joao to patent inventions for
Bernstein, Joao patented them for himself instead. After termination as
Iviewit counsel, Joao worked for infamous convicted felon Marc S. Dreier,
sentenced July 13, 2009, to 20 years in prison. Thomas Cahill, former
Chief Counsel of the First Dept whom Anderson alleges to be the ringleader at
the First Dept, ordered for Special Inquiry. Cahill’s investigation relates
to Krane’s conflicts & Cahill’s role in aiding and abetting the RICO Criminal
Enterprise, which Bernstein claims is composed mainly of corrupt mob type
law firms. Anderson under oath in Scheindlin’s US Fed Court stated “Cleaner”
Goldstein was cleaning complaints against “favored law firms and lawyers”.
NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo fingered by Anderson & Bernstein for
illegal representation of the accused NY State Officials in violation of his
public office duties. Cuomo represents the State Officials both professionally &
personally on the broke NY State taxpayers’ dime and Bernstein alleges the
NY Attorney General is guilty of Felony Title 18 Obstruction of Justice.
Obstruction caused by Cuomo’s conflicting his offices with scienter from
investigating the accused State Defendants they represent while
simultaneously failing to call in a non-conflicted investigator to investigate the
Defendants on behalf of the People of NY.
Cuomo is duty bound by Public Officer Law 17(2)(b), which dictates the
Attorney General not represent State Defendants when conflict with their offices
exist.
Yet Cuomo not only represents the State Defendants when conflict exists in
both Bernstein and Anderson’s lawsuit but has failed to call in any outside
investigator to investigate the State Defendants, his clients, creating a
block to prosecution & obstructing justice. Cuomo, Eliot Spitzer & the NY
Attorney General’s office are Defendants in Bernstein’s suit. The fact they are
Defendants makes the continued representation of the State Defendants by
the Attorney General’s office bizarre and further illegal. Bernstein filed
criminal complaints with the Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn
Fine, the US Attorney General Eric Holder & others regarding the criminal
activities of both the NY and FL Officials.
Bernstein is the inventor of digital imaging & video technologies that
revolutionized the Internet, Television & Digital Imaging, the
technologies valued over a Trillion Dollars over the 20 yr patent life. Bernstein’s
patents are currently on Suspension with the US Patent & Trademark Office by the
Commissioner of Patents while the Office of Enrollment & Discipline (OED)
Director at the US Patent Office, the Federal Patent Bar, investigates
Bernstein’s attorneys for crimes including Fraud Upon the US Patent &
Trademark Office.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/USPTO%20Suspension%20Notices.pdf
Bernstein claims Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Stephen
Lucchesi claimed to be working with Harry I. Moatz, Director of the OED
investigating allegations of crimes against the US & more, Bernstein claims Moatz
confirmed collaboration with the FBI.
Bernstein calls for the end of attorney self regulation & self discipline
by their peers, which has obviously failed, in favor of charging attorneys
with criminal acts to criminal prosecutors, warning that victims of attorneys,
judges and prosecutors who file with attorney run state attorney
regulators are doing themselves a disfavor. Bernstein claims the attorneys gain
advantage through using the state disciplinary agencies, defending themselves in
conflict and gaining confidential information against them, while feathering their
caps with conflicted decisions on Supreme Court letterhead. Bernstein along
with Anderson, testified before the NY Senate Judiciary Committee in NY @
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&feature=player_embedded
& ; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knQLll5hmjs&feature=player_embedded
Chaired by Hon. Senator John Sampson, the hearings to investigate
allegations of corruption in the NY Supreme Court Appellate Divisions. Hearings
remain ongoing & claims made by NY Senators attending to begin a Task Force to
investigate victims’ claims of legal process abuse.
According to Bernstein, one look only at the recent plethora of criminal
activity in the stock market & Ponzi schemes to see that all of these
schemes are run by law firms. Bernstein claims the Ponzis are illegal money
laundering operations for monies illegally obtained by the law firms Criminal RICO
Enterprise activities. Bernstein points to recent schemes such as Bernard
Madoff, former “Sir” Allen Stanford, Marc S. Dreier & Greenberg Traurig’s
involvement directly in a Ponzi, as evidence that lawyers are behind the
schemes & directly involved in intentionally creating subterfuge of the
regulatory agencies that could have prevented these schemes. Greenberg,
recall was central to Abramoff’s fraud and linked to the Stanford Regulatory
Failures.
Other Defendants, reported to the SEC for alleged Shareholder Frauds
relating to the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST include Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner
Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:
INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics
International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed
Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206 FINAL SEC FBI and more
COMPLAINT
Against Warner Bros Time Warner AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
Information regarding these Ponzi schemes and the relation to the Iviewit
crimes @
• Information regarding Greenberg Traurig’s involvement in a
recent
Ponzi, “The American Lawyer is reporting today, May 13, 2010, that the law
firm
of Greenberg Traurig has been sued for its willful participation in and
facilitation of what it knew to be an illegal Ponzi scheme” @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=313 Greenberg represents in conflict the
Florida
Bar and Florida Supreme Court Defendants in Bernstein’s Trillion Dollar
RICO
and ANTITRUST lawsuit, as Greenberg was retained patent counsel by
Bernstein &
therefore acts wholly in violation of law representing Defendants in the
matter.
• Information re the Bernard Madoff, Stanford & Dreier connections
to
Defendant Proskauer @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=307 “Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas
Sjoblom
Further Implicated in the Allen Stanford Ponzi Scheme, Failures of SEC in
Stanford Cited Further Supporting Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein’s Federal
Trillion
Dollar Lawsuit Claims”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=256 “Proskauer (Porksour) Rose Law Firm
Going
Down in Allen Stanford Ponzi, next the trail of money may lead to Iviewit
Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s stolen Trillion Dollar Patents”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=254 “Florida Bar Under Fire for Lack of
Regulation in Robert Allen Stanford & Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme,
Kenneth
Marvin defendant in Iviewit Multi Trillion Dollar Lawsuit”. After reading
the
article, one wonders if the Florida Bar reported this liability in the
Iviewit
Multi Trillion Dollar Federal Lawsuit to State Auditors?
The legally related cases to Anderson are @
Cases @ New York Second Circuit
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary
Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et
al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
5. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. -
WHISTLEBLOWER
LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed.
Judge
Shira A. Scheindlin @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/anderson/20071028%20Anderson%20Original%20Filing.pdf
6. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary Committee, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RIC
O%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.doc
7. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/Esposito/20081228%20Luisa%20Esposito%20Original%20Filing.pdf
8. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial
Conduct,
et al.,
9. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/McKeown/20080307%20Kevin%20McKeown.pdf
10. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
11. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/carvel/Carvel%20Filing.pdf
12. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/Weisshaus/20080439%2008cv4053%20Gizella%20Weisshaus.pdf
13. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/McCormick/McCormick%2008cv4438%20SVM%20Cmplnt.pdf
14. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
15. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al
Other Press Releases
NEWS TIP - SEC CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST AOL, TIME WARNER, INTEL,
LOCKHEED,
SGI FOR SHAREHOLDER FRAUD! IVIEWIT PRESS RELEASE
Iviewit Press Release: World Renowned Inventor of Internet Video and Image
Scaling Formulae Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI
CRIMINAL Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL
Inc.,
Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner
for
Patent Theft, a car bombing and more. Read all about it Online
Interactive
Version of Press Release @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288
Hard Copy of the Release @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-f
iles-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-tim
e-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
(Copy & paste the urls to address bar if not clickable or see attached
PDF)
Prior Press Release re Supreme Court of New York Whistleblower Lawsuit
US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New
York,
et al. Criminal Allegations Requiring Senator John L. Sampson’s Immediate
Attention. In Judge Shira A. Scheindlin’s US Federal Court Whistleblower
Christine C. Anderson Reveals a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein, at the New
York
Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department ETHICS Committee
allegedly
Whitewashing Complaints for US Attorneys, DA’s and more, a scene more
reminiscent of the Gotti Trial on the 26th Floor of the same Federal
Courthouse...Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s Family Minivan Bombed in US Patent
Office Fraud files Twelve Trillion Dollar RICO Suit legally “related” by
Judge Scheindlin to the Whistleblower case (08-4873-cv US Court of Appeals
Second Circuit) and US District Court (07cv11196).
Where was the Press through all this, the Right Arm of Anarchy, not a
single report in over five years regarding a Car Bombing so powerful it blew up
three cars next to it in Boynton Beach Florida and not a single press story?
Where was the Press for the Whistleblower revelations of Whitewashing of
Complaints by the New York Supreme Court for US Attorneys and District Attorneys, a
Cleaner at the Ethics Department that regulates Wall Street Lawyers? Has
Investigative Journalism died? If there are any Journalists or
Investigative Reporters left on earth, please feel free to call me, Eliot Bernstein @
561-245-8588 or write iviewit@iviewit.tv to break the greatest patent
story ever told.
For an Interactive version of the attached Adobe PDF Letter to the New
York
Senate Judiciary Committee and Senator John L. Sampson below with Links to
all
Exhibits @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209
Subject: US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599) Anderson v The State
of New York, et al. Criminal Allegations Requiring Your Immediate Attention,
Revelation of “Cleaner” at NY First Dept Ethics Committee, Whitewashing
Complaints for US Attorneys, District Attorneys and Assistant DA’s and
More.
------
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Surf with Vision
Dear Hon. John L. Sampson, Chairman of the New York Senate Judiciary
Committee,
Please review the attached PDF Document [ or
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209
] which is a letter regarding the Criminal Allegations levied in the
Christine C. Anderson v. New York State et al. case to you and requires actions on
the part of the NY Senate Judiciary Committee.
Very Truly Yours,
Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
--------------------------------
World Renowned Inventor of Trillion Dollar + Technologies and Car Bombing
Victim Eliot Bernstein filed written testimony to supplement his live
testimony before a September 24, 2009 NY State Senate Judiciary Committee hearing
under Chair, NY Senator John L. Sampson, as announced in the attached press
release.
An interactive version of the press release is @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189 and the Formal Written Prepared Statement
is @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165 . The technologies are claimed to
be used across all Internet and Digital Television providers hosting and
distributing video, on Defense applications, Space and Flight simulators,
Guidance Systems, Medical Imaging Devices, GPS Mapping like Google Maps,
You-Tube, the Hubble Space Telescope and much more. Major Fortune 1000
and Wall street interests implicated in the case include Intel, SGI, Lockheed,
IBM,Comcast, Verizon, AOL TW, Yahoo, Universal Studios, Morgan Stanley, CIBC
and much more. In what is commonly now referred to as "Patentgate", the
attention of Washington, DC and Federal Agencies have been trailing the case for
years which involves allegations of Fraud on the US Patent Office and the
Attempted Murder of the Inventor's Family by a Car Bombing in Boynton Beach, Florida
strong enough to take out 3 cars, images @ www.iviewit.tv .
Bernstein filed a TWELVE COUNT - TWELVE TRILLION DOLLAR Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ( RICO ) Federal complaint, the case moved
its way in to New York when Bernstein's case was marked legally "related" by
Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin, to a Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine
Anderson. Anderson case comes from alleged corruption out of the Supreme
Court of NY First Department in Manhattan, which is heading to trial very on
October 19, 2009. Major Law Firms and Wall Street interests implicated in the
matter include major Defense firm Lockheed Martin, the Intel Corporation, Silicon
Graphics Inc and others.
Law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner implicated as central players
in the theft and fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Offices, which
have led to suspension of the Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Office
Commissioner are under investigation, the patents suspended while federal
investigations continue. Proskauer recently sued for aiding and abetting
the Stanford Ponzi scheme and a former SEC Proskauer partner has resigned from
the firm, leaving the firm with a global class action for the entire billions
stolen by Stanford. Ties to Madoff and Proskauer also abound and
Proskauer is also found representing themselves in court against Bernstein their former client, in MASS conflicts of interest.
The press release contains Links to Written Testimony and other releases including a Petition to President Obama and US Attorney General Eric Holder.
The full NY senate Judiciary Committee hearing regarding the Public Office
Corruption in NY can be found @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159 .
Bernstein’s Testimony comes at 4.02.08 on the video timeline where he declares that the State Bar Association is a drinking establishment and that it should be “blown up” and “hard pipe hitting investigators who hate lawyers”
should be charged with investigating and prosecuting dirty lawyers, judges and
politicians, to the jeers of the packed hearing room.
Press Release appeared originally at the totally awesome Free Press Release @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-senator-john-l-sampson-ny-senate-judiciar
y-comm-hearing-testimony-of-iviewit-inventor-eliot-bernstein-re-trillion-dollar-
fed-suit-naming-proskauer-1254966944.html
Amended Complaint – 12 Trillion Dollars @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%
20MED.pdf
February 13th 2009 Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama II to enjoin
TheHonorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General ~ Department
of Justice @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTO
RNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
More @ Expose Corrupt Courts “BREAKING NEWS IN NEW YORK STATE COURT CORRUPTION TRIAL - Anderson Pulls in Powerhouse Trial Team to Confront Court Ethics
Corruption”
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/10/anderson-pulls-in-powerhouse-tri
al-team.html
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum received your email regarding the Florida Bar and the Florida Supreme Court. Attorney General McCollum asked that I respond on his behalf.
Attorney General McCollum issued the following statement on the Florida
Supreme Court's order to convene a statewide grand jury on public
corruption:
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/newsreleases/A26DE7C27763DB94852576BD005BB1E7
The Statewide Prosecutor will serve, by law, as the statewide grand jury's counsel. As mentioned in the above statement, our Statewide Prosecutor will work with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Florida’s state attorneys to identify investigations and cases to bring before the statewide grand jury. I am forwarding your correspondence to the Statewide Prosecution Office for review. However, due to the confidential nature of investigations, the Statewide Prosecution Office is not at
liberty to comment further. We will keep your concerns under advisement.
If you have not already done so, I also encourage you to convey your
concerns to Governor Charlie Crist's Office at:
Office of the Governor
The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001
Telephone: (850) 488-4441
Website: http://www.flgov.com/
You should consult your private attorney for any legal advice you may need. By law our office cannot give legal advice, statutory interpretations, or legal opinions to private individuals or businesses.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your concerns.
Sincerely,
Samantha Santana
Office of Citizen Services ""
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE ON 08/21/2010
RE: Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig, FL Suprem Court
Justices, Florida Bar and more
Subject: Public Corruption Grand Jury
I have spoken at the NY Senate Judiciary Committee who is holding hearings on Court Corruption in NY related to the NY Supreme Court Whistleblower case listd below
My RICO and Antitrust, involving many FL attorneys and
Judges is lated to the Whistleblower Lawsuit.
Florida Supreme Court & Florida Bar sued in Trillion Dollar Federal RICO &
ANTITRUST LAWSUIT - Radio Interview Inventor Eliot Bernstein on Les
Winston's bar the Florida Bar Iviewit Technologies Inventor, Eliot Bernstein, Interviews with Disbar the
Florida Bar’s Radio Host Les Winston ~ The Biz 880am regarding Trillion
Dollar Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit against Florida Bar, FL Supreme Court,
Justice orge Labarga, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig & more.
Lawsuit Legally “Related” to NY Supreme Court Whistleblower, Christine C.
Anderson who reveals an attorney complaint case fixer “Cleaner”, Naomi
Goldstein at NY Ethics Dept which regulates WallStreet.
Press Release Distributed @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-inventor-eliot-bernstein-interview-with-disbar-the-florida-bar-les-winston-the-biz-880am-regarding-trillion-dollar-fed-rico-suit-against-flo-1276897073.html
or online interactive version
@ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=315
Disbar the Florida Bar Radio Host Les Winston interviews Iviewit Tech
Inventor Eliot Bernstein regarding illegal activities at the Florida Supreme Court,
Florida Bar & Judge Jorge Labarga.LISTEN TO INTERVIEW @
http://disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=96
orhttp://www.iviewit.tv/DisbarFloridaBar23.mp3
World-renowned Inventor of Digital Video & Imaging Mathematical Scaling Formulas, Eliot Bernstein discusses with radio talk show host Les Winston f Disbar the Florida Bar his Trillion Dollar Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, naming the Florida Bar, Florida Supreme Court & Labarga as Defendants.
The it marked “legally” related by Judge Shira Scheindlin to a NY Whistleblower suit filed by a Supreme Court of NY Staff Attorney, Christine C. Anderson,
Esq. Bernstein’s Amended Complaint @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf
Anderson alleges the NY Attorney Disciplinary Dept, responsible for the oversight of WallStreet lawyers, has been whitewashing and cleaning disciplinary complaints against attorneys, including US Attorney’s, DA’s & ADA’s. Anderson named a “Cleaner” from the Ethics Dept of the NY Supreme Court, Naomi Goldstein, supervisor at the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
No wonder WallStreet melted down & attorney regulators go unpunished for failures after causing massive damage to the American People, only to then leave government positions or cushy law firm partnerships. Anderson claimed staff attorney, Nicole orrado Esq., on her way to testify at deposition supporting Anderson’s suit was threatened & intimated by a Sr. Court Official regarding giving estimony, creating Federal Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering & more by Court Officials.
Bernstein suing the FL & NY Supreme Courts, State Bars & Disciplinary
Agencies, claims conflicted members of the courts, partners from Proskauer Rose LLP
law firm, the main conspirator in Bernstein’s case along with law firm Foley &
Lardner, illegally handled complaints against partners while holding
official title with the courts & disciplinary agencies. In NY, Bernstein’s
allegations led to unanimous consent of 5 justice of the NY Supreme Court to have
former NY State Bar Association President, Steven Krane, a Proskauer partner,
ordered for investigation for conflicts & the appearance of impropriety. Proskauer’s
Kenneth Rubenstein, the sole (soulless) patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC,
ordered for investigation along with attorney Raymond Joao, who claims to
have put 90+ patents into his own name. Bernstein claims patents filed by Joao
were during & after the time Iviewit retained Joao to patent inventions for
Bernstein, Joao patented them for himself instead. After termination as
Iviewit counsel, Joao worked for infamous convicted felon Marc S. Dreier,
sentenced July 13, 2009, to 20 years in prison. Thomas Cahill, former
Chief Counsel of the First Dept whom Anderson alleges to be the ringleader at
the First Dept, ordered for Special Inquiry. Cahill’s investigation relates
to Krane’s conflicts & Cahill’s role in aiding and abetting the RICO Criminal
Enterprise, which Bernstein claims is composed mainly of corrupt mob type
law firms. Anderson under oath in Scheindlin’s US Fed Court stated “Cleaner”
Goldstein was cleaning complaints against “favored law firms and lawyers”.
NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo fingered by Anderson & Bernstein for
illegal representation of the accused NY State Officials in violation of his
public office duties. Cuomo represents the State Officials both professionally &
personally on the broke NY State taxpayers’ dime and Bernstein alleges the
NY Attorney General is guilty of Felony Title 18 Obstruction of Justice.
Obstruction caused by Cuomo’s conflicting his offices with scienter from
investigating the accused State Defendants they represent while
simultaneously failing to call in a non-conflicted investigator to investigate the
Defendants on behalf of the People of NY.
Cuomo is duty bound by Public Officer Law 17(2)(b), which dictates the
Attorney General not represent State Defendants when conflict with their offices
exist.
Yet Cuomo not only represents the State Defendants when conflict exists in
both Bernstein and Anderson’s lawsuit but has failed to call in any outside
investigator to investigate the State Defendants, his clients, creating a
block to prosecution & obstructing justice. Cuomo, Eliot Spitzer & the NY
Attorney General’s office are Defendants in Bernstein’s suit. The fact they are
Defendants makes the continued representation of the State Defendants by
the Attorney General’s office bizarre and further illegal. Bernstein filed
criminal complaints with the Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn
Fine, the US Attorney General Eric Holder & others regarding the criminal
activities of both the NY and FL Officials.
Bernstein is the inventor of digital imaging & video technologies that
revolutionized the Internet, Television & Digital Imaging, the
technologies valued over a Trillion Dollars over the 20 yr patent life. Bernstein’s
patents are currently on Suspension with the US Patent & Trademark Office by the
Commissioner of Patents while the Office of Enrollment & Discipline (OED)
Director at the US Patent Office, the Federal Patent Bar, investigates
Bernstein’s attorneys for crimes including Fraud Upon the US Patent &
Trademark Office.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/USPTO%20Suspension%20Notices.pdf
Bernstein claims Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Stephen
Lucchesi claimed to be working with Harry I. Moatz, Director of the OED
investigating allegations of crimes against the US & more, Bernstein claims Moatz
confirmed collaboration with the FBI.
Bernstein calls for the end of attorney self regulation & self discipline
by their peers, which has obviously failed, in favor of charging attorneys
with criminal acts to criminal prosecutors, warning that victims of attorneys,
judges and prosecutors who file with attorney run state attorney
regulators are doing themselves a disfavor. Bernstein claims the attorneys gain
advantage through using the state disciplinary agencies, defending themselves in
conflict and gaining confidential information against them, while feathering their
caps with conflicted decisions on Supreme Court letterhead. Bernstein along
with Anderson, testified before the NY Senate Judiciary Committee in NY @
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&feature=player_embedded
& ; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knQLll5hmjs&feature=player_embedded
Chaired by Hon. Senator John Sampson, the hearings to investigate
allegations of corruption in the NY Supreme Court Appellate Divisions. Hearings
remain ongoing & claims made by NY Senators attending to begin a Task Force to
investigate victims’ claims of legal process abuse.
According to Bernstein, one look only at the recent plethora of criminal
activity in the stock market & Ponzi schemes to see that all of these
schemes are run by law firms. Bernstein claims the Ponzis are illegal money
laundering operations for monies illegally obtained by the law firms Criminal RICO
Enterprise activities. Bernstein points to recent schemes such as Bernard
Madoff, former “Sir” Allen Stanford, Marc S. Dreier & Greenberg Traurig’s
involvement directly in a Ponzi, as evidence that lawyers are behind the
schemes & directly involved in intentionally creating subterfuge of the
regulatory agencies that could have prevented these schemes. Greenberg,
recall was central to Abramoff’s fraud and linked to the Stanford Regulatory
Failures.
Other Defendants, reported to the SEC for alleged Shareholder Frauds
relating to the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST include Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner
Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:
INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics
International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed
Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206 FINAL SEC FBI and more
COMPLAINT
Against Warner Bros Time Warner AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
Information regarding these Ponzi schemes and the relation to the Iviewit
crimes @
• Information regarding Greenberg Traurig’s involvement in a
recent
Ponzi, “The American Lawyer is reporting today, May 13, 2010, that the law
firm
of Greenberg Traurig has been sued for its willful participation in and
facilitation of what it knew to be an illegal Ponzi scheme” @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=313 Greenberg represents in conflict the
Florida
Bar and Florida Supreme Court Defendants in Bernstein’s Trillion Dollar
RICO
and ANTITRUST lawsuit, as Greenberg was retained patent counsel by
Bernstein &
therefore acts wholly in violation of law representing Defendants in the
matter.
• Information re the Bernard Madoff, Stanford & Dreier connections
to
Defendant Proskauer @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=307 “Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas
Sjoblom
Further Implicated in the Allen Stanford Ponzi Scheme, Failures of SEC in
Stanford Cited Further Supporting Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein’s Federal
Trillion
Dollar Lawsuit Claims”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=256 “Proskauer (Porksour) Rose Law Firm
Going
Down in Allen Stanford Ponzi, next the trail of money may lead to Iviewit
Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s stolen Trillion Dollar Patents”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=254 “Florida Bar Under Fire for Lack of
Regulation in Robert Allen Stanford & Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme,
Kenneth
Marvin defendant in Iviewit Multi Trillion Dollar Lawsuit”. After reading
the
article, one wonders if the Florida Bar reported this liability in the
Iviewit
Multi Trillion Dollar Federal Lawsuit to State Auditors?
The legally related cases to Anderson are @
Cases @ New York Second Circuit
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary
Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et
al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
5. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. -
WHISTLEBLOWER
LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed.
Judge
Shira A. Scheindlin @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/anderson/20071028%20Anderson%20Original%20Filing.pdf
6. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary Committee, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RIC
O%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.doc
7. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/Esposito/20081228%20Luisa%20Esposito%20Original%20Filing.pdf
8. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial
Conduct,
et al.,
9. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/McKeown/20080307%20Kevin%20McKeown.pdf
10. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
11. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/carvel/Carvel%20Filing.pdf
12. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/Weisshaus/20080439%2008cv4053%20Gizella%20Weisshaus.pdf
13. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al. @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/McCormick/McCormick%2008cv4438%20SVM%20Cmplnt.pdf
14. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
15. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al
Other Press Releases
NEWS TIP - SEC CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST AOL, TIME WARNER, INTEL,
LOCKHEED,
SGI FOR SHAREHOLDER FRAUD! IVIEWIT PRESS RELEASE
Iviewit Press Release: World Renowned Inventor of Internet Video and Image
Scaling Formulae Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI
CRIMINAL Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL
Inc.,
Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner
for
Patent Theft, a car bombing and more. Read all about it Online
Interactive
Version of Press Release @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288
Hard Copy of the Release @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-f
iles-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-tim
e-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
(Copy & paste the urls to address bar if not clickable or see attached
PDF)
Prior Press Release re Supreme Court of New York Whistleblower Lawsuit
US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New
York,
et al. Criminal Allegations Requiring Senator John L. Sampson’s Immediate
Attention. In Judge Shira A. Scheindlin’s US Federal Court Whistleblower
Christine C. Anderson Reveals a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein, at the New
York
Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department ETHICS Committee
allegedly
Whitewashing Complaints for US Attorneys, DA’s and more, a scene more
reminiscent of the Gotti Trial on the 26th Floor of the same Federal
Courthouse...Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s Family Minivan Bombed in US Patent
Office Fraud files Twelve Trillion Dollar RICO Suit legally “related” by
Judge Scheindlin to the Whistleblower case (08-4873-cv US Court of Appeals
Second Circuit) and US District Court (07cv11196).
Where was the Press through all this, the Right Arm of Anarchy, not a
single report in over five years regarding a Car Bombing so powerful it blew up
three cars next to it in Boynton Beach Florida and not a single press story?
Where was the Press for the Whistleblower revelations of Whitewashing of
Complaints by the New York Supreme Court for US Attorneys and District Attorneys, a
Cleaner at the Ethics Department that regulates Wall Street Lawyers? Has
Investigative Journalism died? If there are any Journalists or
Investigative Reporters left on earth, please feel free to call me, Eliot Bernstein @
561-245-8588 or write iviewit@iviewit.tv to break the greatest patent
story ever told.
For an Interactive version of the attached Adobe PDF Letter to the New
York
Senate Judiciary Committee and Senator John L. Sampson below with Links to
all
Exhibits @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209
Subject: US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599) Anderson v The State
of New York, et al. Criminal Allegations Requiring Your Immediate Attention,
Revelation of “Cleaner” at NY First Dept Ethics Committee, Whitewashing
Complaints for US Attorneys, District Attorneys and Assistant DA’s and
More.
------
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Surf with Vision
Dear Hon. John L. Sampson, Chairman of the New York Senate Judiciary
Committee,
Please review the attached PDF Document [ or
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209
] which is a letter regarding the Criminal Allegations levied in the
Christine C. Anderson v. New York State et al. case to you and requires actions on
the part of the NY Senate Judiciary Committee.
Very Truly Yours,
Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
--------------------------------
World Renowned Inventor of Trillion Dollar + Technologies and Car Bombing
Victim Eliot Bernstein filed written testimony to supplement his live
testimony before a September 24, 2009 NY State Senate Judiciary Committee hearing
under Chair, NY Senator John L. Sampson, as announced in the attached press
release.
An interactive version of the press release is @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189 and the Formal Written Prepared Statement
is @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165 . The technologies are claimed to
be used across all Internet and Digital Television providers hosting and
distributing video, on Defense applications, Space and Flight simulators,
Guidance Systems, Medical Imaging Devices, GPS Mapping like Google Maps,
You-Tube, the Hubble Space Telescope and much more. Major Fortune 1000
and Wall street interests implicated in the case include Intel, SGI, Lockheed,
IBM,Comcast, Verizon, AOL TW, Yahoo, Universal Studios, Morgan Stanley, CIBC
and much more. In what is commonly now referred to as "Patentgate", the
attention of Washington, DC and Federal Agencies have been trailing the case for
years which involves allegations of Fraud on the US Patent Office and the
Attempted Murder of the Inventor's Family by a Car Bombing in Boynton Beach, Florida
strong enough to take out 3 cars, images @ www.iviewit.tv .
Bernstein filed a TWELVE COUNT - TWELVE TRILLION DOLLAR Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ( RICO ) Federal complaint, the case moved
its way in to New York when Bernstein's case was marked legally "related" by
Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin, to a Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine
Anderson. Anderson case comes from alleged corruption out of the Supreme
Court of NY First Department in Manhattan, which is heading to trial very on
October 19, 2009. Major Law Firms and Wall Street interests implicated in the
matter include major Defense firm Lockheed Martin, the Intel Corporation, Silicon
Graphics Inc and others.
Law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner implicated as central players
in the theft and fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Offices, which
have led to suspension of the Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Office
Commissioner are under investigation, the patents suspended while federal
investigations continue. Proskauer recently sued for aiding and abetting
the Stanford Ponzi scheme and a former SEC Proskauer partner has resigned from
the firm, leaving the firm with a global class action for the entire billions
stolen by Stanford. Ties to Madoff and Proskauer also abound and
Proskauer is also found representing themselves in court against Bernstein their former client, in MASS conflicts of interest.
The press release contains Links to Written Testimony and other releases including a Petition to President Obama and US Attorney General Eric Holder.
The full NY senate Judiciary Committee hearing regarding the Public Office
Corruption in NY can be found @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159 .
Bernstein’s Testimony comes at 4.02.08 on the video timeline where he declares that the State Bar Association is a drinking establishment and that it should be “blown up” and “hard pipe hitting investigators who hate lawyers”
should be charged with investigating and prosecuting dirty lawyers, judges and
politicians, to the jeers of the packed hearing room.
Press Release appeared originally at the totally awesome Free Press Release @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-senator-john-l-sampson-ny-senate-judiciar
y-comm-hearing-testimony-of-iviewit-inventor-eliot-bernstein-re-trillion-dollar-
fed-suit-naming-proskauer-1254966944.html
Amended Complaint – 12 Trillion Dollars @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%
20MED.pdf
February 13th 2009 Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama II to enjoin
TheHonorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General ~ Department
of Justice @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20Di
strict%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTO
RNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
More @ Expose Corrupt Courts “BREAKING NEWS IN NEW YORK STATE COURT CORRUPTION TRIAL - Anderson Pulls in Powerhouse Trial Team to Confront Court Ethics
Corruption”
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/10/anderson-pulls-in-powerhouse-tri
al-team.html
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum received your email regarding the Florida Bar and the Florida Supreme Court. Attorney General McCollum asked that I respond on his behalf.
Attorney General McCollum issued the following statement on the Florida
Supreme Court's order to convene a statewide grand jury on public
corruption:
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/newsreleases/A26DE7C27763DB94852576BD005BB1E7
The Statewide Prosecutor will serve, by law, as the statewide grand jury's counsel. As mentioned in the above statement, our Statewide Prosecutor will work with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Florida’s state attorneys to identify investigations and cases to bring before the statewide grand jury. I am forwarding your correspondence to the Statewide Prosecution Office for review. However, due to the confidential nature of investigations, the Statewide Prosecution Office is not at
liberty to comment further. We will keep your concerns under advisement.
If you have not already done so, I also encourage you to convey your
concerns to Governor Charlie Crist's Office at:
Office of the Governor
The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001
Telephone: (850) 488-4441
Website: http://www.flgov.com/
You should consult your private attorney for any legal advice you may need. By law our office cannot give legal advice, statutory interpretations, or legal opinions to private individuals or businesses.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your concerns.
Sincerely,
Samantha Santana
Office of Citizen Services ""
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC and FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro, against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, and .
SEC Complaint Filed, is the SEC Listening .. It Does not sound like it. The SEC must be covering up for Favors owed, covering and protecting billionair tech companies and Above the Law Law Firms Like Foley and Lardner and Proskauer Rose.
Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner.
"" March 14, 2010 --
FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO SEC & FBI
RE SHAREHOLDER FRAUD BY LEADING BLUE CHIPS
Corp Management of Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited have known about the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Liabilities for years & allegedly have concealed the liabilities from Shareholders & in some instances reorganized to the detriment of Shareholders in alleged fraudulent transactions, which may lead to Shareholder Rescissory Rights & catastrophic damage to the companies as complained of to Fed Officials.FEB 12, 2010 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTThe SEC Complaint filed Feb 12, 2010,
“Iviewit & Eliot I. Bernstein Official Formal Complaint…against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. & Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged Fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 & other SEC accounting violations & violations of State, Federal & Int’l Laws; Rescissory Rights of Shareholders; Evidence & Important Info for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Sir Robert Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen & more”
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGIA SEC complaint also was filed by Iviewit against Intel, SGI & Lockheed & similar allegations were levied against these corps for Patent Theft, knowing infringement & Shareholder Fraud.
The March 29th 2009 SEC Complaint to Shapiro titled “Complaint Regarding Intel Corp & Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel Shareholders & Others”http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf
12 COUNT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FED RICO & ANTITRUST SUIT LEGALLY MARKED “RELATED” TO NY SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT
Liabilities for the complained of companies centers on both knowing technology infringements & liabilities from failure to report the Fed RICO & ANTITRUST filed by Iviewit & now legally marked “RELATED” to the Whistleblower suit of Christine C. Anderson, a former staff attorney for the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division. Anderson gave riveting testimony of systemic corruption to the NY State Senate Judiciary & in sworn testimony in before Judge Shira Scheindlin of Whitewashing & Criminal Obstruction by Court Officials for “Favored Lawyers & Law Firms, the US Attorney in New York, the DA and Asst DA” or words to that effect. Anderson further fingered one of the “CLEANERS” of ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS at the NY Supreme Court as Naomi Goldstein.A “CLEANER” at the ETHICS department of NY responsible for attorney regulation in Manhattan & the WallStreet financial district, perhaps the reason the country is suffering from a lack of attorney regulation in the heart of the financial district that has led to lax or complicit regulators and prosecutors and a worldwide economic meltdown.
Anderson’s testimony http://www.iviewit.tv/20090608nysjudiciaryhearing/index.htmhttp://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205
Bernstein testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary of systemic corruption that has blocked due process & procedure via corrupt infiltration of the NY Courts @http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165
HOUSE OF CARD COLLAPSING ON NY CRIME SYNDICATE INSIDE NY COURTS, ETHICS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC OFFICES & REGULATORY AGENCIES BY CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS & LAWYERSThe House of Cards is Crumbling on Key Players in the Iviewit Scandal as the NY Corruption Scandal Elevates to Senior NY Political Figures including Cuomo & members of the NY Supreme Court & US Fed Courts in NY. Proskauer Rose.
Proskauer, mastermind of the bungled attempt to steal the Iviewit patents through Fraud on the US Patent Office & further bungled attempts to cover up the crimes in the NY Courts is under further scrutiny with Proskauer’s direct involvement in the Stanford Financial Ponzi & subsequent resignation of partner Thomas Sjoblom, a former SEC enforcement officer, allegedly found coaching Stanford employees on how to lie to SEC & FBI investigators at a Miami Airport Hanger preceding the arrest of Stanford & his employees.
Proskauer also sued in a Class Action suit for the entire 7 billion dollar Stanford losses & sued by an arrested Stanford employee. Proskauer has further direct ties to both the Madoff & Dreier Ponzis.NY Attorney General CuomoFollowing the illegal representation by the NY AG in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST suit & Anderson’s Whistleblower suit under Spitzer as NY AG, the Cuomo Admin continues to represent illegally State Defendants in both cases left over by Spitzer (a named Defendant in the RICO and Antitrust).
As the Iviewit & Anderson claims are further investigated & litigated these present the largest liability to Cuomo’s run for any office as the largest scandal brewing in NY begins to unravel with his offices dead center.
Anderson’s filing http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf
Iviewit filings of Illegal rep by Cuomo @http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080305%20Final%20Plaintiff%20Oposition%20to%20AG%20Cuomo%20letter%20email%20copy.pdfhttp://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090129%20Final%20Extension%20of%20Time%202%20SIGNED%20low.pdf
The US District CourtWith Anderson’s revelations in the US District Court & the Jury finding that her 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech regarding Whistleblower Allegations had been violated, the whole case has been called into question & further questioned due to the ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION of the NY AG Cuomo’s office. Based on Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Officials, Anderson filed for an entirely new hearing based on the Cuomo’s mass conflicts. Iviewit alleges that NY AG Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Defendants, Officially & Personally, violates his office duties & obligations of honest services to NY, public office rules and violates state & federal laws, whereby the Conflicts of Interest act to block investigation of the State Defendants fingered by Whistleblower Anderson & in Iviewit’s suit, causing Obstruction of Justice through Fraud on the Court. Serious allegations for Cuomo who continues to illegally represent State Officials on public funds, while failing to investigate those same public officials, including former NY Chief Judge Judith Kaye.
Also of concern is if these massive liabilities have been reported to State Auditors by Cuomo?The US 2nd CircuitIn the US Second Circuit, Iviewit filed a “Motion to Compel” compelling that court to follow law, as with Anderson’s revelations exposing court members, that court has tried to ILLEGALLY Dismiss all the legally “related” cases to Anderson in attempts to bury them & keep the lids on the scandal that may lead them to exchange their legal robes for prison garb. Motion to Compel
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=78http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf ""
"Addressed to:
SEC Chair Mary Shapiro
SEC IG, H. David Kotz
IG OF THE US DOJ, Glenn Fine
FBI
HOUSE & SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
NY SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
US AG, Eric Holder
Treasury IG, David Gouvaia
SBA IG, Peggy Gustafson & Daniel O’Rourke
US DEP OF COMMERCE IG, Todd Zinser
Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Dir of the USPTO, David Kappos
Deputy Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Deputy Dir of the USPTO, Sharon Barner
USPTO - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT & DISCIPLINE DIR, Harry I. Moatz
US PRESIDENT, Hon President of the US, Barack H. Obama II
FILED AGAINST
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Barry Meyer
Pres & COO: Alan Horn
EVP & CFO: Edward Romano
VP & Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne Smith
AOL, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Tim Armstrong
GC & EVP: Ira Parker
Counsel - Patent Lit, Prosecution & Licensing: Christopher Day
Exec Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley
Time Warner, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Jeffrey Bewkes
EVP & GC: Paul Cappuccio
MARCH 29, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGI "
Press Release for Immediate Release
Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner.
"" March 14, 2010 --
FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO SEC & FBI
RE SHAREHOLDER FRAUD BY LEADING BLUE CHIPS
Corp Management of Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited have known about the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Liabilities for years & allegedly have concealed the liabilities from Shareholders & in some instances reorganized to the detriment of Shareholders in alleged fraudulent transactions, which may lead to Shareholder Rescissory Rights & catastrophic damage to the companies as complained of to Fed Officials.FEB 12, 2010 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTThe SEC Complaint filed Feb 12, 2010,
“Iviewit & Eliot I. Bernstein Official Formal Complaint…against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. & Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged Fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 & other SEC accounting violations & violations of State, Federal & Int’l Laws; Rescissory Rights of Shareholders; Evidence & Important Info for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Sir Robert Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen & more”
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274
and
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGIA SEC complaint also was filed by Iviewit against Intel, SGI & Lockheed & similar allegations were levied against these corps for Patent Theft, knowing infringement & Shareholder Fraud.
The March 29th 2009 SEC Complaint to Shapiro titled “Complaint Regarding Intel Corp & Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel Shareholders & Others”http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf
12 COUNT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FED RICO & ANTITRUST SUIT LEGALLY MARKED “RELATED” TO NY SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT
Liabilities for the complained of companies centers on both knowing technology infringements & liabilities from failure to report the Fed RICO & ANTITRUST filed by Iviewit & now legally marked “RELATED” to the Whistleblower suit of Christine C. Anderson, a former staff attorney for the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division. Anderson gave riveting testimony of systemic corruption to the NY State Senate Judiciary & in sworn testimony in before Judge Shira Scheindlin of Whitewashing & Criminal Obstruction by Court Officials for “Favored Lawyers & Law Firms, the US Attorney in New York, the DA and Asst DA” or words to that effect. Anderson further fingered one of the “CLEANERS” of ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS at the NY Supreme Court as Naomi Goldstein.A “CLEANER” at the ETHICS department of NY responsible for attorney regulation in Manhattan & the WallStreet financial district, perhaps the reason the country is suffering from a lack of attorney regulation in the heart of the financial district that has led to lax or complicit regulators and prosecutors and a worldwide economic meltdown.
Anderson’s testimony http://www.iviewit.tv/20090608nysjudiciaryhearing/index.htmhttp://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205
Bernstein testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary of systemic corruption that has blocked due process & procedure via corrupt infiltration of the NY Courts @http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165
HOUSE OF CARD COLLAPSING ON NY CRIME SYNDICATE INSIDE NY COURTS, ETHICS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC OFFICES & REGULATORY AGENCIES BY CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS & LAWYERSThe House of Cards is Crumbling on Key Players in the Iviewit Scandal as the NY Corruption Scandal Elevates to Senior NY Political Figures including Cuomo & members of the NY Supreme Court & US Fed Courts in NY. Proskauer Rose.
Proskauer, mastermind of the bungled attempt to steal the Iviewit patents through Fraud on the US Patent Office & further bungled attempts to cover up the crimes in the NY Courts is under further scrutiny with Proskauer’s direct involvement in the Stanford Financial Ponzi & subsequent resignation of partner Thomas Sjoblom, a former SEC enforcement officer, allegedly found coaching Stanford employees on how to lie to SEC & FBI investigators at a Miami Airport Hanger preceding the arrest of Stanford & his employees.
Proskauer also sued in a Class Action suit for the entire 7 billion dollar Stanford losses & sued by an arrested Stanford employee. Proskauer has further direct ties to both the Madoff & Dreier Ponzis.NY Attorney General CuomoFollowing the illegal representation by the NY AG in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST suit & Anderson’s Whistleblower suit under Spitzer as NY AG, the Cuomo Admin continues to represent illegally State Defendants in both cases left over by Spitzer (a named Defendant in the RICO and Antitrust).
As the Iviewit & Anderson claims are further investigated & litigated these present the largest liability to Cuomo’s run for any office as the largest scandal brewing in NY begins to unravel with his offices dead center.
Anderson’s filing http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf
Iviewit filings of Illegal rep by Cuomo @http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080305%20Final%20Plaintiff%20Oposition%20to%20AG%20Cuomo%20letter%20email%20copy.pdfhttp://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090129%20Final%20Extension%20of%20Time%202%20SIGNED%20low.pdf
The US District CourtWith Anderson’s revelations in the US District Court & the Jury finding that her 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech regarding Whistleblower Allegations had been violated, the whole case has been called into question & further questioned due to the ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION of the NY AG Cuomo’s office. Based on Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Officials, Anderson filed for an entirely new hearing based on the Cuomo’s mass conflicts. Iviewit alleges that NY AG Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Defendants, Officially & Personally, violates his office duties & obligations of honest services to NY, public office rules and violates state & federal laws, whereby the Conflicts of Interest act to block investigation of the State Defendants fingered by Whistleblower Anderson & in Iviewit’s suit, causing Obstruction of Justice through Fraud on the Court. Serious allegations for Cuomo who continues to illegally represent State Officials on public funds, while failing to investigate those same public officials, including former NY Chief Judge Judith Kaye.
Also of concern is if these massive liabilities have been reported to State Auditors by Cuomo?The US 2nd CircuitIn the US Second Circuit, Iviewit filed a “Motion to Compel” compelling that court to follow law, as with Anderson’s revelations exposing court members, that court has tried to ILLEGALLY Dismiss all the legally “related” cases to Anderson in attempts to bury them & keep the lids on the scandal that may lead them to exchange their legal robes for prison garb. Motion to Compel
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=78http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf ""
"Addressed to:
SEC Chair Mary Shapiro
SEC IG, H. David Kotz
IG OF THE US DOJ, Glenn Fine
FBI
HOUSE & SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
NY SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
US AG, Eric Holder
Treasury IG, David Gouvaia
SBA IG, Peggy Gustafson & Daniel O’Rourke
US DEP OF COMMERCE IG, Todd Zinser
Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Dir of the USPTO, David Kappos
Deputy Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Deputy Dir of the USPTO, Sharon Barner
USPTO - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT & DISCIPLINE DIR, Harry I. Moatz
US PRESIDENT, Hon President of the US, Barack H. Obama II
FILED AGAINST
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Barry Meyer
Pres & COO: Alan Horn
EVP & CFO: Edward Romano
VP & Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne Smith
AOL, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Tim Armstrong
GC & EVP: Ira Parker
Counsel - Patent Lit, Prosecution & Licensing: Christopher Day
Exec Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley
Time Warner, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Jeffrey Bewkes
EVP & GC: Paul Cappuccio
MARCH 29, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGI "
Press Release for Immediate Release
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Iviewit Founder and Inventor Eliot Bernstein Files SEC Complaint on Trillion Dollar Patent Liability.
"" Introduction – background info
I, Eliot Bernstein, of 2753 NW 34th Street, Boca Raton, Florida 33434, as one of the Original Owners and Inventors of revolutionary "backbone technologies" that transformed digital video and imaging, am filing this FORMAL COMPLAINT with the SEC and all agencies and committees addressed herein, against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Inc. and Time Warner Cable, whereby these companies and all of their subsidiaries, affiliates, contractors, agents and employees collectively are referred to herein as (“Warner Bros et al.”).
Please note that these companies previously were under the same corporate structure during most, if not all, of the critically relevant times to this complaint.
This timeframe includes both the original merger of Warner Bros et al. to the recent breakup of Warner Bros et al. and the allegations levied herein may have directly, and illegally, influenced those transactions to the detriment of Shareholders.
Future detrimental effects on Shareholders, if failure to investigate these matters is not instant, may result in causing further massive losses to Shareholders of these highly traded New York Stock Exchange companies.
The losses could be thousands of times greater than the Ponzi Schemes of Stanford, Madoff and Dreier combined and those schemes evidenced herein have ties to the alleged crimes described herein.
For your convenience, I have attached the following link to a Press Statement issued about the Merger of Warner Bros et al. back in 2000[1].
In addition, I make a special note concerning the urgency and Time Sensitive nature of these matters predicated upon various factors, including but not limited to, the recent corporate split of AOL Inc. and Time Warner, Inc., which itself should be fully and completely investigated by the SEC as part of this complaint with direct correlation to the matters herein, for all of the reasons set forth herein.
The Investigation should, include but not be limited to, all original stock and securities related transactions in the original Warner Bros et al. merger and all transactions forward. All of these transactions dating back to 1998 may have been influenced by the alleged fraud and involvement in criminal activity described herein.
Leading Industry Experts working inside Warner Bros et al. (See attached Exhibit 1 – List of Warner Bros et al. contacts) and related companies, tested, used, viewed, approved, validated, Contracted and Licensed[2] my technologies under multiple Non Disclosures and other Licensing Agreements.
Attached hereto are various Internal communications within Warner Bros et al. documenting the relationship and admitted uses, including an ADMISSION by technologists within the organization, that my Technologies were being infringed upon AFTER NDA’s had been executed.
These agreements then resulted in a Signed and Executed Licensing Agreement at that time as illustrated and exhibited herein. Warner Bros et al. and others complained of herein may be perpetrating Massive Fraud on their Shareholders through concealment of these Massive Liabilities resulting from the theft and unauthorized uses of my technologies over almost a decade.
The technologies have revolutionized digital imaging and video hardware and software and instantly heralded by leading experts in 1998 as the “Holy Grail” of the Internet that allows quality video and imaging as now used worldwide by almost every user of a PC.
But broader than merely the Internet the technologies are used on virtually every camera, video camera, television, medical imaging device, telescope, microscope, satellite, DVD, graphics chip, gaming hardware and software, flight and space simulators, etc. and paved the way for new markets entirely, such as cell phone video and Voice Over Internet Protocol (“VOIP”).
Then it was discovered that our Intellectual Property Attorneys from Proskauer Rose LLP (“Proskauer”), Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley”) and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel LLP (“Meltzer”) with the help of early licensors of my technologies, including Intel Corporation (“Intel”), Lockheed Martin (“Lockheed”), Silicon Graphics Inc. (“SGI” ), Warner Bros., AOL, IBM and more, tried to grab the “Grail”.
When caught, as evidenced herein, these powerful law firms and blue chip companies resorted to terrorist styled attacks on the key inventor, including a Car Bombing and Death threats.
As I have attempted to pursue my rights and report their crimes, they have further resorted to a litany of cover up crimes in the courts and at regulatory agencies and again they were caught violating law and public offices over the last nine years in efforts to stave off prosecution for their crimes.
All of these offenses are subject to multiple ongoing State, Federal and International investigations and a Twelve 12 Twelve, 12 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit[3].
The Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit has been marked legally “RELATED” to a Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit of a New York Supreme Court Staff Attorney, discussed herein in under the section Titled “Discussion of Ongoing Lawsuits and Related Cases to Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson” .
Sony, Intel, Lockheed, IBM, Silicon Graphics and others are also complained of herein and all authorities this complaint is addressed too should investigate all those Defendants in my Amended Complaint exhibited herein, many for similar and identical crimes. ""
Full Complaint and Source of Post Click Here
I, Eliot Bernstein, of 2753 NW 34th Street, Boca Raton, Florida 33434, as one of the Original Owners and Inventors of revolutionary "backbone technologies" that transformed digital video and imaging, am filing this FORMAL COMPLAINT with the SEC and all agencies and committees addressed herein, against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Inc. and Time Warner Cable, whereby these companies and all of their subsidiaries, affiliates, contractors, agents and employees collectively are referred to herein as (“Warner Bros et al.”).
Please note that these companies previously were under the same corporate structure during most, if not all, of the critically relevant times to this complaint.
This timeframe includes both the original merger of Warner Bros et al. to the recent breakup of Warner Bros et al. and the allegations levied herein may have directly, and illegally, influenced those transactions to the detriment of Shareholders.
Future detrimental effects on Shareholders, if failure to investigate these matters is not instant, may result in causing further massive losses to Shareholders of these highly traded New York Stock Exchange companies.
The losses could be thousands of times greater than the Ponzi Schemes of Stanford, Madoff and Dreier combined and those schemes evidenced herein have ties to the alleged crimes described herein.
For your convenience, I have attached the following link to a Press Statement issued about the Merger of Warner Bros et al. back in 2000[1].
In addition, I make a special note concerning the urgency and Time Sensitive nature of these matters predicated upon various factors, including but not limited to, the recent corporate split of AOL Inc. and Time Warner, Inc., which itself should be fully and completely investigated by the SEC as part of this complaint with direct correlation to the matters herein, for all of the reasons set forth herein.
The Investigation should, include but not be limited to, all original stock and securities related transactions in the original Warner Bros et al. merger and all transactions forward. All of these transactions dating back to 1998 may have been influenced by the alleged fraud and involvement in criminal activity described herein.
Leading Industry Experts working inside Warner Bros et al. (See attached Exhibit 1 – List of Warner Bros et al. contacts) and related companies, tested, used, viewed, approved, validated, Contracted and Licensed[2] my technologies under multiple Non Disclosures and other Licensing Agreements.
Attached hereto are various Internal communications within Warner Bros et al. documenting the relationship and admitted uses, including an ADMISSION by technologists within the organization, that my Technologies were being infringed upon AFTER NDA’s had been executed.
These agreements then resulted in a Signed and Executed Licensing Agreement at that time as illustrated and exhibited herein. Warner Bros et al. and others complained of herein may be perpetrating Massive Fraud on their Shareholders through concealment of these Massive Liabilities resulting from the theft and unauthorized uses of my technologies over almost a decade.
The technologies have revolutionized digital imaging and video hardware and software and instantly heralded by leading experts in 1998 as the “Holy Grail” of the Internet that allows quality video and imaging as now used worldwide by almost every user of a PC.
But broader than merely the Internet the technologies are used on virtually every camera, video camera, television, medical imaging device, telescope, microscope, satellite, DVD, graphics chip, gaming hardware and software, flight and space simulators, etc. and paved the way for new markets entirely, such as cell phone video and Voice Over Internet Protocol (“VOIP”).
Then it was discovered that our Intellectual Property Attorneys from Proskauer Rose LLP (“Proskauer”), Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley”) and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel LLP (“Meltzer”) with the help of early licensors of my technologies, including Intel Corporation (“Intel”), Lockheed Martin (“Lockheed”), Silicon Graphics Inc. (“SGI” ), Warner Bros., AOL, IBM and more, tried to grab the “Grail”.
When caught, as evidenced herein, these powerful law firms and blue chip companies resorted to terrorist styled attacks on the key inventor, including a Car Bombing and Death threats.
As I have attempted to pursue my rights and report their crimes, they have further resorted to a litany of cover up crimes in the courts and at regulatory agencies and again they were caught violating law and public offices over the last nine years in efforts to stave off prosecution for their crimes.
All of these offenses are subject to multiple ongoing State, Federal and International investigations and a Twelve 12 Twelve, 12 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit[3].
The Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit has been marked legally “RELATED” to a Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit of a New York Supreme Court Staff Attorney, discussed herein in under the section Titled “Discussion of Ongoing Lawsuits and Related Cases to Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson” .
Sony, Intel, Lockheed, IBM, Silicon Graphics and others are also complained of herein and all authorities this complaint is addressed too should investigate all those Defendants in my Amended Complaint exhibited herein, many for similar and identical crimes. ""
Full Complaint and Source of Post Click Here
Warner Bros. Signed Non Disclosure Agreements with Iviewit, Warner Violated those Agreements. Warner Signed License and Service Agreements..
Is the SEC Listening, LOOKING... do they even Care.. or will Mary Schapiro and the SEC just sit and wait for a Multi-Billion to Trillion Dollar Scandal and they say Whoops.. We had NO WAY to Know.. and then Of Course Investigative Blogger, Crystal L. Cox will have to Say What a Crock That is - Because does ANYONE at the SEC know How To work GOOGLE... ??? or any Search Engine Really.. or Possibly READ Complaints... ???
Warner Bros. - has broke the Law and in the process put shareholders at HUGE risk, why is Jeffrey Bewkes ignoring this blatant proof of Fraud.
Warner Bros signed multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements and Warner Bros. Signed License and Service Agreements with the Iviewit Company. 9 years have passed and Warner Bros. Blatantly and Illegally Violated those agreements long ago, why?
And Now Eliot Bernstein Founder and one of the Inventors it the Iviewit Stolen Patent has filed a very informative, incredibly detailed SEC Complaint. One that for Now Mary Schapiro and the SEC seems to be ignoring... I am not sure why just yet.. but hope to get tips on this soon...
Some of the Warner Bros' Iviewit Timeline and more details
of the Warner Bros. Relationship with the Iviewit Company.
" " TIMELINE OF WARNER BROS ET AL. RELATIONSHIP WITH IVIEWIT
The following Timelines are presented to give a factual timeline to the allegations herein, the exhibits are linked online and all Uniform Resource Locators (“URL”) and Exhibited Links throughout this document are hereby incorporated, in entirety by reference herein, including over 1000 evidentiary links on the homepage at www.iviewit.tv with exhibits that contain thousands of pages of factual evidence[5].
The timeline will also reveal facts regarding the relationships between many of the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Warner Bros et al., including relations to the main perpetrator of the alleged crimes, the law firm Proskauer Rose.
*Note Warner Bros et al. relevant mergers, acquisitions and breakups to these matters in the timeline below are in bold italics.
1998-2002
Relevant Communications Between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al.
· 1998-2001
Inventions in Imaging and Video Discovered and Intellectual Property Filings begin in 1998. Proskauer Rose was retained Intellectual Property counsel for Iviewit for filing of Intellectual Properties.
· 2000-2002
Warner Bros et al. signs multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.
Non-Disclosure Agreements @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf
Pages 1-5, 10, 61-62, 80, 108-109, 234
· November 02, 2000 ~ Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf
· January 11, 2001 ~ America Online and Time Warner Complete Merger to Create AOL Time Warner
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,668364,00.html
· February 08, 2001 ~ Letter from David J. Colter (“Colter”) ~ Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Founder of AOL, Ted Leonsis (“Leonsis”), regarding the efficacy of the Iviewit technologies.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010208%20Colter%20to%20Leonsis%20Warner%20Bros%20AOL.pdf
· February 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - Signed Warner Bros. License And Service Agreement @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.
Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein ’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.
Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al.
Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective. Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors.
The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
· April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL. AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
· May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.
I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. ""
Source of Post and of Warner Bros SEC Complaint
So Where is Mary Schapiro on this One ?
jeffrey bewkes
Warner Bros. - has broke the Law and in the process put shareholders at HUGE risk, why is Jeffrey Bewkes ignoring this blatant proof of Fraud.
Warner Bros signed multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements and Warner Bros. Signed License and Service Agreements with the Iviewit Company. 9 years have passed and Warner Bros. Blatantly and Illegally Violated those agreements long ago, why?
And Now Eliot Bernstein Founder and one of the Inventors it the Iviewit Stolen Patent has filed a very informative, incredibly detailed SEC Complaint. One that for Now Mary Schapiro and the SEC seems to be ignoring... I am not sure why just yet.. but hope to get tips on this soon...
Some of the Warner Bros' Iviewit Timeline and more details
of the Warner Bros. Relationship with the Iviewit Company.
" " TIMELINE OF WARNER BROS ET AL. RELATIONSHIP WITH IVIEWIT
The following Timelines are presented to give a factual timeline to the allegations herein, the exhibits are linked online and all Uniform Resource Locators (“URL”) and Exhibited Links throughout this document are hereby incorporated, in entirety by reference herein, including over 1000 evidentiary links on the homepage at www.iviewit.tv with exhibits that contain thousands of pages of factual evidence[5].
The timeline will also reveal facts regarding the relationships between many of the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Warner Bros et al., including relations to the main perpetrator of the alleged crimes, the law firm Proskauer Rose.
*Note Warner Bros et al. relevant mergers, acquisitions and breakups to these matters in the timeline below are in bold italics.
1998-2002
Relevant Communications Between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al.
· 1998-2001
Inventions in Imaging and Video Discovered and Intellectual Property Filings begin in 1998. Proskauer Rose was retained Intellectual Property counsel for Iviewit for filing of Intellectual Properties.
· 2000-2002
Warner Bros et al. signs multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.
Non-Disclosure Agreements @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf
Pages 1-5, 10, 61-62, 80, 108-109, 234
· November 02, 2000 ~ Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf
· January 11, 2001 ~ America Online and Time Warner Complete Merger to Create AOL Time Warner
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,668364,00.html
· February 08, 2001 ~ Letter from David J. Colter (“Colter”) ~ Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Founder of AOL, Ted Leonsis (“Leonsis”), regarding the efficacy of the Iviewit technologies.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010208%20Colter%20to%20Leonsis%20Warner%20Bros%20AOL.pdf
· February 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - Signed Warner Bros. License And Service Agreement @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.
Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein ’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.
Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al.
Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective. Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors.
The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
· April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL. AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
· May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.
I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. ""
Source of Post and of Warner Bros SEC Complaint
So Where is Mary Schapiro on this One ?
jeffrey bewkes
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Intel - Proskauer Rose - New York Courts - Foley Larder - Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson in New York September 2009
"" « September 24, 2009 Public Hearing: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner
Prepared Statement of Eliot I. Bernstein of Iviewit to New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Regarding Trillion Dollar Iviewit Federal Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Larnder, IBM, Intel, SGI, Lockheed and More »
September 24, 2009 Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson NY: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Intel, IBM, SGI & Lockheed Martin.
SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Senator John Sampson Chairman
SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
Monday June 8, 2009
NYC
250 Broadway
NY NY
10 A.M.
19th Floor
ORAL TESTIMONY BY INVITATION ONLY
Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09
The Judicial & Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York
1. Richard Kuse of New City, NY
2. Victor Kovner of the Fund for Modem Courts
3. Douglas Higbee of Mamaroneck, NY
4. Judith Herskowitz of Miami Beach, FL
5. Peter Gonzalez of Troy, NY
6. Andrea Wilkinson of Rensselaer, NY
7. Maria Gkanios of Mahopac, NY
8. Dominic Lieto of Mahopac, NY
9. Regina Felton Esq of Brooklyn, NY
10. Kathryn Malarkey of Purchase, NY
11. Nora Renzuli, Esq. of Staten Island, NY
12. Stephanie Klein of Long Beach, NY
13. Ike Aruti of Rosedale, NY
14. Terrence Finnan of Keene, NY
15. Gizella Weisshaus, NY
16. Eliot I. Bernstein of Boca Raton, FL
17. Suzanne McCormick & Patrick Handley of NY
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys.
Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys.
The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.
According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed.
This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process. ""
Full Article, Source of Post and VIDEO Click Below
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159
posted HERE by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Prepared Statement of Eliot I. Bernstein of Iviewit to New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Regarding Trillion Dollar Iviewit Federal Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Larnder, IBM, Intel, SGI, Lockheed and More »
September 24, 2009 Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson NY: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Intel, IBM, SGI & Lockheed Martin.
SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Senator John Sampson Chairman
SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
Monday June 8, 2009
NYC
250 Broadway
NY NY
10 A.M.
19th Floor
ORAL TESTIMONY BY INVITATION ONLY
Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09
The Judicial & Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York
1. Richard Kuse of New City, NY
2. Victor Kovner of the Fund for Modem Courts
3. Douglas Higbee of Mamaroneck, NY
4. Judith Herskowitz of Miami Beach, FL
5. Peter Gonzalez of Troy, NY
6. Andrea Wilkinson of Rensselaer, NY
7. Maria Gkanios of Mahopac, NY
8. Dominic Lieto of Mahopac, NY
9. Regina Felton Esq of Brooklyn, NY
10. Kathryn Malarkey of Purchase, NY
11. Nora Renzuli, Esq. of Staten Island, NY
12. Stephanie Klein of Long Beach, NY
13. Ike Aruti of Rosedale, NY
14. Terrence Finnan of Keene, NY
15. Gizella Weisshaus, NY
16. Eliot I. Bernstein of Boca Raton, FL
17. Suzanne McCormick & Patrick Handley of NY
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys.
Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys.
The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.
According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed.
This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process. ""
Full Article, Source of Post and VIDEO Click Below
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159
posted HERE by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Friday, February 5, 2010
P. Stephen Lamont - Friend or Foe of the Iviewit Shareholders?
Is P. Stephen Lamont working for or Against the Iviewit Shareholders and the best interest of the Iviewit Inventors?
******
Below is an excerpt from an SEC letter to be filed shortly regarding information regarding the fraudulent actions of P. Stephen Lamont in his continued representation of Iviewit, as CEO no less, at an address where no Iviewit company has ever been incorporated or listed with any agency.
P. Stephen Lamont was fired long ago and has no right to act in any capacity for Iviewit or Iviewit Shareholders.
P. Stephen Lamont also has been reported to the courts for his criminal activities in representing shareholders in my Federal RICO and Antitrust case when he is not a licensed attorney and never has passed the bar.
You will find other information below regarding the illegal activities of P. Stephen Lamont and he has been reported to State and Federal agencies regarding these crimes.
I advise anyone considering dealing with P. Stephen Lamont in any capacity to check with your legal counsel about the possible ramifications you may incur regarding any issues with Iviewit and Lamont. These latest assaults on my character etc. appear to be feeble attempts by a desperate man whose cover and misdeeds have been exposed.
P. Stephen Lamont also references filings with the US Second Circuit whereby his separate appeal has been dismissed but fails to mention that in my appeal he also was identified for illegally representing Iviewit Shareholders when he is not an attorney.
• FEBRUARY 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - SIGNED WARNER BROS. LICENSE AND SERVICE AGREEMENT @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
• August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more. Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees. Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[1].
At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros. et al.
o Whereby former Acting CEO of Iviewit P. Stephen Lamont, ( a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis ) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the agreement is attempted to be wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, perhaps because they were denying its existence.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors. The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
• April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL.
AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment.
Chey formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony ( also under Signed Agreements ) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION
of Sony’s involvement in these matters.
Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros. et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors. I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC can take this Formal Complaint additionally
as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY.
• December 20, 2001 ~ P. Stephen Lamont's letter to Kenneth Rubenstein regarding Smith and Rubenstein and the refusal of Rubenstein to RE-OPINE to Smith due to what he claims is a “CONFLICT”, which led further to the breakdown of relations between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al. Lamont later affirmed to Shareholders in a written communication that Microsoft had planted him in the Iviewit companies.
Later P. Stephen Lamont changed that story to AOL and Leonsis’ niece had planted him in Iviewit through AOL Founder Leonsis’ best friend Chuck Brunelas (“Brunelas”). Brunelas recruited under contract Lamont to the Iviewit companies on behalf of Leonsis. Lamont’s revelations of being planted at the company which came after he was hired led to the termination of Lamont at that time[2].
December 20, 2001 P. Stephen Lamont Letters to Kenneth Rubenstein ~
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020611%20System%20and%20Method%20for%20Fraud%20on%20USPTO.pdf
Pages 455-462
o November 09, 2001 ~ Brunelas Employment Agreement
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011109%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20Agreement%20re%20Warner%20Bros%20AOLTW.pdf
o Based on new information since that time, it is alleged that Rubenstein, Lamont, Leonsis and Smith operated together to sabotage Iviewit/Warner Bros. et al. relations and others, purposefully to breach the prior signed licensing agreements and avoid paying the royalties owed to the Iviewit companies, using the old “good guy / bad guy” routine.
The SEC should note here that Hall and I recently reported Lamont to Federal and State authorities for alleged collusion in the RICO activities claimed in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, including ongoing criminal activities[3].
Further, Lamont continues to represent himself and Iviewit Shareholders as the Iviewit CEO, when he is fully aware of his termination from employment and that he has no authorization from the Board of Directors, Management or Shareholders to represent their security interests in Iviewit companies, this securities fraud also should be subject for investigation by the SEC.
• P. Stephen Lamont claims to be CEO of Iviewit Technologies, Inc. in multiple correspondences and Federal court papers with an address at 175 King Street. Armonk, N.Y. 10504 and whereby no Iviewit offices were ever opened or authorized at this address. The office is directly across the street from Defendant in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit IBM’s world headquarters.
o Additional Evidence for the SEC regarding P. Stephen Lamont is contained in a June 18, 2009 Letter to New York Attorney General Chief of Staff, Steven M. Cohen regarding fraudulent activities of Lamont @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090618%20FINAL%20NYAG%20Steven%20Cohen%20Letter%20Re%20Lamont%20Signed.pdf
o The SEC should note here that Lamont’s initial resume submitted by Iviewit contracted employment recruiter, Brunelas, is materially different and contradicts what Lamont himself recently claims regarding his past on the Iviewit Homepage, in multiple court filings and other letters to Iviewit shareholders.
• Original 2001 Resume Submitted to Iviewit on P. Stephen Lamont by Brunelas @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Lamont%20Resume%20Given%20to%20Iviewit%20by%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• 2001 Resume Claims the following:
Columbia University School of Law ~ J. D. in Commercial and Regulatory Law - May 1992
Columbia University Graduate School of Business ~ M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting - May 1981
State University of New York at Cortland ~ B.A. in Economics - June 1978
• 2009 Iviewit Homepage Statement written by P. Stephen Lamont claims:
“By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit.
With more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering” Source www.iviewit.tv homepage.
• Whereby Lamont’s legal and other degrees claimed are wholly different and therefore false in one or both of his background accounts as they are materially different, again causation for further investigation of Lamont by the SEC and other investigators this letter has been copied or addressed to.
• Further, you will note that Lamont refers to himself as “former Acting CEO of Iviewit” and claims counsel advised him to resign any official role due to the potential for charges of fraud, and I advised Lamont to follow counsels’ advice and personally, I did not accept any official roles on counsels’ advice.
Yet, even in recent court documents and other illegally signed documents executed by Lamont to major Blue Chip companies, including Microsoft, Lamont now represents himself as CEO of Iviewit inapposite of counsels’ advice, at an address that is not registered to any company Lamont claims to be employed as CEO by.
• August 05, 2009 Lamont Letter to Microsoft http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20090805%20Lamont%20Illegal%20Letter%20to%20Microsoft.pdf
• Lamont further now claims such executive role in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, claiming he is CEO of Iviewit, when no Board has ever put him in that position and when he is fully cognizant that he has no authority legally to represent Iviewit Shareholders. Lamont even attempts to represent Iviewit Shareholders and Companies currently in Federal Court, while not having ever passed the bar to practice law and therefore precluded from representing others in court. Again, cause for further investigation of Lamont.
• February 09, 2009 Lamont Court Filing
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090209%20Lamont%20Attempt%20to%20Quash%20Bernstein%20Motion.pdf
• The SEC should note here that while the document claims service on February 09, 2008, it appears executed February 09, 2009.
Whereby the SEC should also note that Lamont does not represent himself individually in the Lawsuit but acts on behalf of Iviewit Shareholders of which he has no authorization from Shareholders to act on their behalf and also is not a lawyer, making it ILLEGAL for him to act on others behalf in a legal capacity.
The District Court and Second Circuit Court notified of this ILLEGAL representation and asked by me to force amendment of the complaint, instead continue to allow the ILLEGAL representation of Lamont to continue. This ILLEGAL representation of Shareholders is also a serious criminal act.
• Finally, at the company Digital Factory that Lamont lists as one of his former employers, in his resume previously exhibited herein, one of the company employees later disclosed that Lamont had been in stock trouble for securities fraud with the board of that company, of course Lamont’s resume failed to disclose this material fact.
• December 31, 2001 – Letter from Brunelas to Greg B. Thagard (“Thagard”) ~ Vice President Advanced Technology Technical Operations at Warner Bros. The letter is regarding Thagard’s acceptance of an Iviewit Advisory Board Position. Later both Thagard and Colter would receive Iviewit Stock options for their Board roles with approval of Warner Bros. and Sony executives.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011231%20Brunelas%20to%20Thagard%20Regarding%20Joining%20Iviewit%20Advisory%20Board.pdf
• January 07, 2002 ~ Letters by Lamont regarding his meeting with Rubenstein regarding Warner Bros et al. Rubenstein was presented the exhibited document in draft form at his deposition, where he read it and then dodged questions regarding why his name is referenced in relation to opinions he gave to Warner Bros. et al. after denying he knew anything about Iviewit or the patents.
The letter wholly contradicts his prior denial of knowing of the Iviewit inventions or Eliot Bernstein, contradicting his sworn deposition statements and sworn letters to Judge Jorge Labarga constituting multiple instances of perjury and more.
January 07, 2002 and more P. Lamont letters to Kenneth Rubenstein
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2006%2003%20Iviewit%20Rebuttal%20to%20Wheeler%202nd%20Response_Final.pdf
Pages 19-23
o November 20, 2002 Kenneth Rubenstein Deposition and Deposition Exhibits
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Depositions%20BOOKMARKED%20SEARCHABLE%20with%20hyperlink%20comments.pdf
Pages 1-100, the exhibits attached to the deposition show Kenneth Rubenstein’s denials.
• January 14, 2002 Warner Bros. employee Colter’s internal Warner Bros. document containing an ADMISSION OF USE OF IVIEWIT PROPRIETARY PROCESSES AND VIOLATION OF NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS by many Warner Bros. et al. employees. The letter also provides affirmation that Rubenstein ( MPEGLA LLC Patent Counsel, former Iviewit Proskauer Rose Patent Counsel and Warner Bros. counsel ) opined favorably to Warner Bros. The document again directly refutes Rubenstein’s statements in deposition and written communications to the Labarga court that he did not opine or even know of the Iviewit inventions.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
• February 17, 2002 – Eliot Bernstein letter to Brunelas Regarding Smith’s sudden request to have Rubenstein of Proskauer speak to him to re-opine on his former statements, already exhibited herein, regarding the efficacy and novelty of the patents.
Kenneth Rubenstein was acting Patent Counsel to Iviewit as indicated in the exhibited Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer billed to author and distribute to Iviewit potential investors when he opined to Warner Bros.
The links below provide information on Kenneth Rubenstein’s position as an Iviewit Board member and Iviewit Patent Counsel despite his statements to the contrary.
At the time Smith requested to speak with Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein already were terminated by Iviewit and investigations were already underway regarding the patent thefts and more.
o February 17, 2002 Letter from Eliot Bernstein to Brunelas.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020117%20Bernstein%20letter%20to%20Brunelas%20Regarding%20Smith%20response%20to%20Colter%20to%20talk%20with%20Rubenstein%20Poskauer.pdf
o January 2001 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, whereby the SEC should note here that Kenneth Rubenstein is listed both as Iviewit Patent Counsel and an Iviewit Advisory Board member.
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Wachovia%20Private%20Placement%20Memorandum%20Bookmarked.pdf
Page 4 – “Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio - Mr. Rubenstein is the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Page 16 - “Strong and Experienced Board of Directors and Advisory Board.” iviewit's Board of Directors and Advisors consist of several well-established individuals from the technology, entertainment, and financial community.
Directors have extensive backgrounds with top-tier firms such as Goldman Sachs, Kidder Peabody, and McKinsey & Co. Crossbow Ventures has provided $3.0 million in funding and sits on the Board.
Technology and entertainment guidance comes from a partner at Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway & Wertheimer and from Kenneth Rubenstein, the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Additionally on Page 16 - “The Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio. The Company's strategy is to establish market precedence through licensing of trade secrets and know-how.
Page 38 – ADVISORY BOARD SECTION
“Kenneth Rubenstein Partner, Proskauer Rose LLP. Mr. Rubenstein is a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP law firm and is the patent attorney for iviewit. He is a registered patent attorney before the US. Patent & Trademark Office.
Mr. Rubenstein counsels his clients with respect to the validity and infringement of competitors' patents, as well as prosecutes patent applications. For the past several years he has worked on the formation of a patent pool, for MPEG-2 technology, involving large consumer electronics and entertainment companies.
He is also a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. Mr. Rubenstein received his law degree, cum laude, from New York Law School and his Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he also graduated with a B.S. Degree.
The SEC should note here that Rubenstein’s attempt to claim he never heard of Iviewit, including at his deposition, allegedly is due to the massive conflicts of interest that Rubenstein had.
If Kenneth Rubenstein were patent counsel to Iviewit and simultaneously counsel to Warner Bros. et al. when he originally opined to Colter, without conflict waivers or disclosure, this obviously would have violated attorney conduct codes and law.
Additionally, Kenneth Rubenstein is conflicted with the patent pooling scheme and artifice to fraud inventors he has created, MPEGLA LLC, where again he acted as counsel and founder of MPEGLA LLC while also patent counsel to Iviewit.
The conflict here is again obvious where the Iviewit technologies were the single greatest threat to his pools as Iviewit has the dominant technology, which without, the MPEG license would be worthless.
The SEC should note that Rubenstein initially misrepresented himself and Joao as Proskauer Partners to Iviewit, when prior to learning of my inventions they were both with Meltzer.
Kenneth Rubenstein is counsel and sole patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC now one of the largest infringers of the Iviewit technologies, licensing Warner Bros et al.
Proskauer, after learning of my technologies value, estimated at a trillion dollars to “priceless” by leading engineers at Real 3D, Inc. and without a patent department at the time in 1998, then rushed to acquire Rubenstein and his Meltzer patent group and the MPEGLA LLC pools.
When the acquisition was complete, Proskauer, my former patent counsel, directly began inuring benefits from the stolen technologies via their new client MPEGLA LLC in their new Intellectual Property department created after learning of my inventions.
MPEGLA has now tied and bundled my inventions to their pools licensing schemes, converting the royalties from the technologies from Iviewit and through other anticompetitive tactics have kept Iviewit from market in classic RICO and Antitrust violations, including violations of Sherman and Clayton, as further defined in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit exhibited already herein.
The SEC should note here that Warner Bros. et al. and many of those involved directly in these matters are also involved in DVD patent pooling schemes, including but not limited to, DVD6C Patent Pool[4].
Whereby, similar to MPEGLA LLC’s illegal use of my technologies, DVD6C has similarly tied and bundled my technologies to their pools licenses, excluding me from royalties and then inuring royalties from others from my technologies directly from their membership in the pool.
o The SEC should note that the only Meltzer Intellectual Property attorney not to transfer to Proskauer at the time of acquisition was a one Raymond Joao, who initially with Rubenstein was represented as a Proskauer partner and who took initial patent disclosures with Rubenstein.
In 1999-2000 it was learned that Raymond Joao was putting patents into his own name while sabotaging the Iviewit patents. Upon leaving Iviewit, Joao claimed publically that he had 90+ patents in his name and then went to work for Marc S. Dreier, recently prosecuted and convicted by the SEC for an alleged Ponzi scheme, as further evidenced later herein.
February 08, 2002 – Lamont letter to John D. Calkins (“Calkins”) ~ Senior Vice President New Media Business Development of Warner Bros., regarding stock issued to Warner Bros. employees Colter and Thagard for Advisory Board roles they accepted and also regarding their about face and breach of contracts.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020208%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Re%20Colter%20and%20Thagard%20Advisory%20Board%20Stock.pdf
• February 20, 2002 – Calkins Letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
The SEC should note that opposite of Warner Bros. claim in the letter that Iviewit is creating a false record, it is instead Warner Bros. that attempts to create a false and misleading record of fact in the letter.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020220%20Calkins%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Warner%20Bros%20Wayne%20Smith.pdf
• February 27, 2002 – Lamont to Calkins about Warner Bros. Breach of Contracts, the SEC should note that while Lamont relies on the NDA, the February 15, 2001 SIGNED LICENSING AGREEMENT, illustrated above, also has strong language about IP rights concerning the Iviewit technologies that also are violated.
Also, take note, that at this time in 2002, Warner Bros. et al. knew of the breaches and formally was notified by Iviewit at that time of such breaches and therefore they should have begun accounting for the IP Liabilities at this time, if not earlier according to FASB accounting rules.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020227%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Breach%20more.pdf
• March 05, 2002 – Smith letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020305%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Calkins.pdf
• November 20, 2002 - April 15, 2002 Letter by Lamont to Rubenstein Regarding Conversations with Warner Bros et al. presented to Rubenstein at his November 20, 2002 Deposition as already discussed herein.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Kenneth%20Rubenstein%20Deposition%20with%20Exhibits%20CERT.pdf
pages 3-9
Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros. et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements.
Warner Bros. et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.
Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged criminal RICO activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros. et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of pouring in $25 Million Dollars in investment capital to my companies.
When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the filed patents and Calkins regarding corporate fraud.
At that time, Warner Bros et al. employees and personnel became aware of fraud relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional to what Andersen had found on or about that time and this information was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Smith and Calkins.
Colter relayed that Warner Bros. et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement.
A Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer circulated to potential Iviewit investors including Warner Bros. et al. These Securities Frauds contained in the Private Placement are also cause for further SEC investigation.
Per Colter, Warner Bros. et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer Rose, Foley and Larder and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.
Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues.
Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.
Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office which resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions.
Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP.
Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by their counsel Proskauer Rose.
Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer Rose LLP or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement.
It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer Rose were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer Rose LLP and had Stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations.
Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies.
The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office and others.
Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose law firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit.
Kenneth Rubenstein is under investigation with other attorneys by Moatz and was also ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of five justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety for violating public offices to block complaints I filed against him.
Where later, after discovery of the Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, it was learned that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros. was working with Kenneth Rubenstein ( Iviewit Patent Counsel, MPEGLA Counsel and Warner Bros. Counsel ) and that their relationship somehow now precluded Kenneth Rubenstein from re-opining on his prior opinion of the patents for Warner Bros. employees as already evidenced herein.
Whereby Warner Bros. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of those binding signed agreements.
The MPEGLA LLC patent pooling scheme created and overseen by Counsel Rubenstein is merely an artifice to defraud inventors and has illegally precluded me from market in classic antitrust activities, including death threats and a car bomb.
Whereby the DVD Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in have also used the technologies in violation of signed contracts and agreements, admittedly, yet since that time they too have excluded Iviewit from market, again in classic antitrust activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 year Massive Liabilities.
The SEC should note that while there is a long gap in time between these prior Iviewit and Warner Bros et al., communications and contracts and the current contact to notify them again of liabilities resulting from the IP infringement and the newer Lawsuit liabilities, that during the gap I was actively pursuing my rights.
I have given similar information to several investigators and courts over the several years in between communications regarding Warner Bros. et al. involvement in the Iviewit allegations in my Federal RICO Lawsuit.
During the time, I was also forced to flee my home several times for my family’s safety, including from death threats from Mr. Brian Utley on behalf of the law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner and then from actual Attempted Murder of my family. Attempted Murder through a Car Bombing of my family minivan in Del Ray Beach, FL., images of the Car Bombing can be found on the www.iviewit.tv [5] homepage.
Eliot Bernstein... Information to be found at http://www.iviewit.tv/
More Details on the Iviewit Case at www.Iviewit.TV
******
Below is an excerpt from an SEC letter to be filed shortly regarding information regarding the fraudulent actions of P. Stephen Lamont in his continued representation of Iviewit, as CEO no less, at an address where no Iviewit company has ever been incorporated or listed with any agency.
P. Stephen Lamont was fired long ago and has no right to act in any capacity for Iviewit or Iviewit Shareholders.
P. Stephen Lamont also has been reported to the courts for his criminal activities in representing shareholders in my Federal RICO and Antitrust case when he is not a licensed attorney and never has passed the bar.
You will find other information below regarding the illegal activities of P. Stephen Lamont and he has been reported to State and Federal agencies regarding these crimes.
I advise anyone considering dealing with P. Stephen Lamont in any capacity to check with your legal counsel about the possible ramifications you may incur regarding any issues with Iviewit and Lamont. These latest assaults on my character etc. appear to be feeble attempts by a desperate man whose cover and misdeeds have been exposed.
P. Stephen Lamont also references filings with the US Second Circuit whereby his separate appeal has been dismissed but fails to mention that in my appeal he also was identified for illegally representing Iviewit Shareholders when he is not an attorney.
• FEBRUARY 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - SIGNED WARNER BROS. LICENSE AND SERVICE AGREEMENT @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
• August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more. Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees. Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[1].
At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros. et al.
o Whereby former Acting CEO of Iviewit P. Stephen Lamont, ( a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis ) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the agreement is attempted to be wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, perhaps because they were denying its existence.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors. The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
• April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL.
AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment.
Chey formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony ( also under Signed Agreements ) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION
of Sony’s involvement in these matters.
Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros. et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors. I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC can take this Formal Complaint additionally
as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY.
• December 20, 2001 ~ P. Stephen Lamont's letter to Kenneth Rubenstein regarding Smith and Rubenstein and the refusal of Rubenstein to RE-OPINE to Smith due to what he claims is a “CONFLICT”, which led further to the breakdown of relations between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al. Lamont later affirmed to Shareholders in a written communication that Microsoft had planted him in the Iviewit companies.
Later P. Stephen Lamont changed that story to AOL and Leonsis’ niece had planted him in Iviewit through AOL Founder Leonsis’ best friend Chuck Brunelas (“Brunelas”). Brunelas recruited under contract Lamont to the Iviewit companies on behalf of Leonsis. Lamont’s revelations of being planted at the company which came after he was hired led to the termination of Lamont at that time[2].
December 20, 2001 P. Stephen Lamont Letters to Kenneth Rubenstein ~
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020611%20System%20and%20Method%20for%20Fraud%20on%20USPTO.pdf
Pages 455-462
o November 09, 2001 ~ Brunelas Employment Agreement
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011109%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20Agreement%20re%20Warner%20Bros%20AOLTW.pdf
o Based on new information since that time, it is alleged that Rubenstein, Lamont, Leonsis and Smith operated together to sabotage Iviewit/Warner Bros. et al. relations and others, purposefully to breach the prior signed licensing agreements and avoid paying the royalties owed to the Iviewit companies, using the old “good guy / bad guy” routine.
The SEC should note here that Hall and I recently reported Lamont to Federal and State authorities for alleged collusion in the RICO activities claimed in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, including ongoing criminal activities[3].
Further, Lamont continues to represent himself and Iviewit Shareholders as the Iviewit CEO, when he is fully aware of his termination from employment and that he has no authorization from the Board of Directors, Management or Shareholders to represent their security interests in Iviewit companies, this securities fraud also should be subject for investigation by the SEC.
• P. Stephen Lamont claims to be CEO of Iviewit Technologies, Inc. in multiple correspondences and Federal court papers with an address at 175 King Street. Armonk, N.Y. 10504 and whereby no Iviewit offices were ever opened or authorized at this address. The office is directly across the street from Defendant in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit IBM’s world headquarters.
o Additional Evidence for the SEC regarding P. Stephen Lamont is contained in a June 18, 2009 Letter to New York Attorney General Chief of Staff, Steven M. Cohen regarding fraudulent activities of Lamont @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090618%20FINAL%20NYAG%20Steven%20Cohen%20Letter%20Re%20Lamont%20Signed.pdf
o The SEC should note here that Lamont’s initial resume submitted by Iviewit contracted employment recruiter, Brunelas, is materially different and contradicts what Lamont himself recently claims regarding his past on the Iviewit Homepage, in multiple court filings and other letters to Iviewit shareholders.
• Original 2001 Resume Submitted to Iviewit on P. Stephen Lamont by Brunelas @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Lamont%20Resume%20Given%20to%20Iviewit%20by%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• 2001 Resume Claims the following:
Columbia University School of Law ~ J. D. in Commercial and Regulatory Law - May 1992
Columbia University Graduate School of Business ~ M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting - May 1981
State University of New York at Cortland ~ B.A. in Economics - June 1978
• 2009 Iviewit Homepage Statement written by P. Stephen Lamont claims:
“By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit.
With more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering” Source www.iviewit.tv homepage.
• Whereby Lamont’s legal and other degrees claimed are wholly different and therefore false in one or both of his background accounts as they are materially different, again causation for further investigation of Lamont by the SEC and other investigators this letter has been copied or addressed to.
• Further, you will note that Lamont refers to himself as “former Acting CEO of Iviewit” and claims counsel advised him to resign any official role due to the potential for charges of fraud, and I advised Lamont to follow counsels’ advice and personally, I did not accept any official roles on counsels’ advice.
Yet, even in recent court documents and other illegally signed documents executed by Lamont to major Blue Chip companies, including Microsoft, Lamont now represents himself as CEO of Iviewit inapposite of counsels’ advice, at an address that is not registered to any company Lamont claims to be employed as CEO by.
• August 05, 2009 Lamont Letter to Microsoft http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20090805%20Lamont%20Illegal%20Letter%20to%20Microsoft.pdf
• Lamont further now claims such executive role in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, claiming he is CEO of Iviewit, when no Board has ever put him in that position and when he is fully cognizant that he has no authority legally to represent Iviewit Shareholders. Lamont even attempts to represent Iviewit Shareholders and Companies currently in Federal Court, while not having ever passed the bar to practice law and therefore precluded from representing others in court. Again, cause for further investigation of Lamont.
• February 09, 2009 Lamont Court Filing
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090209%20Lamont%20Attempt%20to%20Quash%20Bernstein%20Motion.pdf
• The SEC should note here that while the document claims service on February 09, 2008, it appears executed February 09, 2009.
Whereby the SEC should also note that Lamont does not represent himself individually in the Lawsuit but acts on behalf of Iviewit Shareholders of which he has no authorization from Shareholders to act on their behalf and also is not a lawyer, making it ILLEGAL for him to act on others behalf in a legal capacity.
The District Court and Second Circuit Court notified of this ILLEGAL representation and asked by me to force amendment of the complaint, instead continue to allow the ILLEGAL representation of Lamont to continue. This ILLEGAL representation of Shareholders is also a serious criminal act.
• Finally, at the company Digital Factory that Lamont lists as one of his former employers, in his resume previously exhibited herein, one of the company employees later disclosed that Lamont had been in stock trouble for securities fraud with the board of that company, of course Lamont’s resume failed to disclose this material fact.
• December 31, 2001 – Letter from Brunelas to Greg B. Thagard (“Thagard”) ~ Vice President Advanced Technology Technical Operations at Warner Bros. The letter is regarding Thagard’s acceptance of an Iviewit Advisory Board Position. Later both Thagard and Colter would receive Iviewit Stock options for their Board roles with approval of Warner Bros. and Sony executives.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011231%20Brunelas%20to%20Thagard%20Regarding%20Joining%20Iviewit%20Advisory%20Board.pdf
• January 07, 2002 ~ Letters by Lamont regarding his meeting with Rubenstein regarding Warner Bros et al. Rubenstein was presented the exhibited document in draft form at his deposition, where he read it and then dodged questions regarding why his name is referenced in relation to opinions he gave to Warner Bros. et al. after denying he knew anything about Iviewit or the patents.
The letter wholly contradicts his prior denial of knowing of the Iviewit inventions or Eliot Bernstein, contradicting his sworn deposition statements and sworn letters to Judge Jorge Labarga constituting multiple instances of perjury and more.
January 07, 2002 and more P. Lamont letters to Kenneth Rubenstein
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2006%2003%20Iviewit%20Rebuttal%20to%20Wheeler%202nd%20Response_Final.pdf
Pages 19-23
o November 20, 2002 Kenneth Rubenstein Deposition and Deposition Exhibits
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Depositions%20BOOKMARKED%20SEARCHABLE%20with%20hyperlink%20comments.pdf
Pages 1-100, the exhibits attached to the deposition show Kenneth Rubenstein’s denials.
• January 14, 2002 Warner Bros. employee Colter’s internal Warner Bros. document containing an ADMISSION OF USE OF IVIEWIT PROPRIETARY PROCESSES AND VIOLATION OF NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS by many Warner Bros. et al. employees. The letter also provides affirmation that Rubenstein ( MPEGLA LLC Patent Counsel, former Iviewit Proskauer Rose Patent Counsel and Warner Bros. counsel ) opined favorably to Warner Bros. The document again directly refutes Rubenstein’s statements in deposition and written communications to the Labarga court that he did not opine or even know of the Iviewit inventions.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
• February 17, 2002 – Eliot Bernstein letter to Brunelas Regarding Smith’s sudden request to have Rubenstein of Proskauer speak to him to re-opine on his former statements, already exhibited herein, regarding the efficacy and novelty of the patents.
Kenneth Rubenstein was acting Patent Counsel to Iviewit as indicated in the exhibited Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer billed to author and distribute to Iviewit potential investors when he opined to Warner Bros.
The links below provide information on Kenneth Rubenstein’s position as an Iviewit Board member and Iviewit Patent Counsel despite his statements to the contrary.
At the time Smith requested to speak with Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein already were terminated by Iviewit and investigations were already underway regarding the patent thefts and more.
o February 17, 2002 Letter from Eliot Bernstein to Brunelas.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020117%20Bernstein%20letter%20to%20Brunelas%20Regarding%20Smith%20response%20to%20Colter%20to%20talk%20with%20Rubenstein%20Poskauer.pdf
o January 2001 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, whereby the SEC should note here that Kenneth Rubenstein is listed both as Iviewit Patent Counsel and an Iviewit Advisory Board member.
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Wachovia%20Private%20Placement%20Memorandum%20Bookmarked.pdf
Page 4 – “Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio - Mr. Rubenstein is the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Page 16 - “Strong and Experienced Board of Directors and Advisory Board.” iviewit's Board of Directors and Advisors consist of several well-established individuals from the technology, entertainment, and financial community.
Directors have extensive backgrounds with top-tier firms such as Goldman Sachs, Kidder Peabody, and McKinsey & Co. Crossbow Ventures has provided $3.0 million in funding and sits on the Board.
Technology and entertainment guidance comes from a partner at Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway & Wertheimer and from Kenneth Rubenstein, the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Additionally on Page 16 - “The Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio. The Company's strategy is to establish market precedence through licensing of trade secrets and know-how.
Page 38 – ADVISORY BOARD SECTION
“Kenneth Rubenstein Partner, Proskauer Rose LLP. Mr. Rubenstein is a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP law firm and is the patent attorney for iviewit. He is a registered patent attorney before the US. Patent & Trademark Office.
Mr. Rubenstein counsels his clients with respect to the validity and infringement of competitors' patents, as well as prosecutes patent applications. For the past several years he has worked on the formation of a patent pool, for MPEG-2 technology, involving large consumer electronics and entertainment companies.
He is also a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. Mr. Rubenstein received his law degree, cum laude, from New York Law School and his Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he also graduated with a B.S. Degree.
The SEC should note here that Rubenstein’s attempt to claim he never heard of Iviewit, including at his deposition, allegedly is due to the massive conflicts of interest that Rubenstein had.
If Kenneth Rubenstein were patent counsel to Iviewit and simultaneously counsel to Warner Bros. et al. when he originally opined to Colter, without conflict waivers or disclosure, this obviously would have violated attorney conduct codes and law.
Additionally, Kenneth Rubenstein is conflicted with the patent pooling scheme and artifice to fraud inventors he has created, MPEGLA LLC, where again he acted as counsel and founder of MPEGLA LLC while also patent counsel to Iviewit.
The conflict here is again obvious where the Iviewit technologies were the single greatest threat to his pools as Iviewit has the dominant technology, which without, the MPEG license would be worthless.
The SEC should note that Rubenstein initially misrepresented himself and Joao as Proskauer Partners to Iviewit, when prior to learning of my inventions they were both with Meltzer.
Kenneth Rubenstein is counsel and sole patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC now one of the largest infringers of the Iviewit technologies, licensing Warner Bros et al.
Proskauer, after learning of my technologies value, estimated at a trillion dollars to “priceless” by leading engineers at Real 3D, Inc. and without a patent department at the time in 1998, then rushed to acquire Rubenstein and his Meltzer patent group and the MPEGLA LLC pools.
When the acquisition was complete, Proskauer, my former patent counsel, directly began inuring benefits from the stolen technologies via their new client MPEGLA LLC in their new Intellectual Property department created after learning of my inventions.
MPEGLA has now tied and bundled my inventions to their pools licensing schemes, converting the royalties from the technologies from Iviewit and through other anticompetitive tactics have kept Iviewit from market in classic RICO and Antitrust violations, including violations of Sherman and Clayton, as further defined in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit exhibited already herein.
The SEC should note here that Warner Bros. et al. and many of those involved directly in these matters are also involved in DVD patent pooling schemes, including but not limited to, DVD6C Patent Pool[4].
Whereby, similar to MPEGLA LLC’s illegal use of my technologies, DVD6C has similarly tied and bundled my technologies to their pools licenses, excluding me from royalties and then inuring royalties from others from my technologies directly from their membership in the pool.
o The SEC should note that the only Meltzer Intellectual Property attorney not to transfer to Proskauer at the time of acquisition was a one Raymond Joao, who initially with Rubenstein was represented as a Proskauer partner and who took initial patent disclosures with Rubenstein.
In 1999-2000 it was learned that Raymond Joao was putting patents into his own name while sabotaging the Iviewit patents. Upon leaving Iviewit, Joao claimed publically that he had 90+ patents in his name and then went to work for Marc S. Dreier, recently prosecuted and convicted by the SEC for an alleged Ponzi scheme, as further evidenced later herein.
February 08, 2002 – Lamont letter to John D. Calkins (“Calkins”) ~ Senior Vice President New Media Business Development of Warner Bros., regarding stock issued to Warner Bros. employees Colter and Thagard for Advisory Board roles they accepted and also regarding their about face and breach of contracts.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020208%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Re%20Colter%20and%20Thagard%20Advisory%20Board%20Stock.pdf
• February 20, 2002 – Calkins Letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
The SEC should note that opposite of Warner Bros. claim in the letter that Iviewit is creating a false record, it is instead Warner Bros. that attempts to create a false and misleading record of fact in the letter.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020220%20Calkins%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Warner%20Bros%20Wayne%20Smith.pdf
• February 27, 2002 – Lamont to Calkins about Warner Bros. Breach of Contracts, the SEC should note that while Lamont relies on the NDA, the February 15, 2001 SIGNED LICENSING AGREEMENT, illustrated above, also has strong language about IP rights concerning the Iviewit technologies that also are violated.
Also, take note, that at this time in 2002, Warner Bros. et al. knew of the breaches and formally was notified by Iviewit at that time of such breaches and therefore they should have begun accounting for the IP Liabilities at this time, if not earlier according to FASB accounting rules.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020227%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Breach%20more.pdf
• March 05, 2002 – Smith letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020305%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Calkins.pdf
• November 20, 2002 - April 15, 2002 Letter by Lamont to Rubenstein Regarding Conversations with Warner Bros et al. presented to Rubenstein at his November 20, 2002 Deposition as already discussed herein.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Kenneth%20Rubenstein%20Deposition%20with%20Exhibits%20CERT.pdf
pages 3-9
Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros. et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements.
Warner Bros. et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.
Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged criminal RICO activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros. et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of pouring in $25 Million Dollars in investment capital to my companies.
When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the filed patents and Calkins regarding corporate fraud.
At that time, Warner Bros et al. employees and personnel became aware of fraud relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional to what Andersen had found on or about that time and this information was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Smith and Calkins.
Colter relayed that Warner Bros. et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement.
A Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer circulated to potential Iviewit investors including Warner Bros. et al. These Securities Frauds contained in the Private Placement are also cause for further SEC investigation.
Per Colter, Warner Bros. et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer Rose, Foley and Larder and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.
Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues.
Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.
Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office which resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions.
Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP.
Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by their counsel Proskauer Rose.
Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer Rose LLP or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement.
It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer Rose were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer Rose LLP and had Stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations.
Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies.
The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office and others.
Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose law firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit.
Kenneth Rubenstein is under investigation with other attorneys by Moatz and was also ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of five justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety for violating public offices to block complaints I filed against him.
Where later, after discovery of the Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, it was learned that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros. was working with Kenneth Rubenstein ( Iviewit Patent Counsel, MPEGLA Counsel and Warner Bros. Counsel ) and that their relationship somehow now precluded Kenneth Rubenstein from re-opining on his prior opinion of the patents for Warner Bros. employees as already evidenced herein.
Whereby Warner Bros. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of those binding signed agreements.
The MPEGLA LLC patent pooling scheme created and overseen by Counsel Rubenstein is merely an artifice to defraud inventors and has illegally precluded me from market in classic antitrust activities, including death threats and a car bomb.
Whereby the DVD Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in have also used the technologies in violation of signed contracts and agreements, admittedly, yet since that time they too have excluded Iviewit from market, again in classic antitrust activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 year Massive Liabilities.
The SEC should note that while there is a long gap in time between these prior Iviewit and Warner Bros et al., communications and contracts and the current contact to notify them again of liabilities resulting from the IP infringement and the newer Lawsuit liabilities, that during the gap I was actively pursuing my rights.
I have given similar information to several investigators and courts over the several years in between communications regarding Warner Bros. et al. involvement in the Iviewit allegations in my Federal RICO Lawsuit.
During the time, I was also forced to flee my home several times for my family’s safety, including from death threats from Mr. Brian Utley on behalf of the law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner and then from actual Attempted Murder of my family. Attempted Murder through a Car Bombing of my family minivan in Del Ray Beach, FL., images of the Car Bombing can be found on the www.iviewit.tv [5] homepage.
Eliot Bernstein... Information to be found at http://www.iviewit.tv/
More Details on the Iviewit Case at www.Iviewit.TV
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)