Request for Meeting with Governor Scott pursuant to discussion with the Governor's Staff on Tuesday Feb. 8th 2011 .
Showing posts with label iViewIt Technologies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label iViewIt Technologies. Show all posts
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Office of Governor Rick Scott, Jason Harell, Kira Frye - Petition for an Executive Order Appointing a Special Prosecutor for the iViewit Companies
Petition for an Executive Order Appointing a Special Prosecutor for the iViewit Companies and Eliot Bernstein's formal Criminal Complaint submitted for Criminal Prosecution to the State of Florida Nineteenth Statewide Grand Jury on Public Corruption Case No. SC-09-1910
Monday, October 25, 2010
Eliot Bernstein on FBI Investigation of Iviewit Technologies
"they better have a big ol' fat file"
Click Here for More Videos / Voice on Iviewit
for More on the iViewit Technology Go to
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.iViewit.TV
Click Here for More Videos / Voice on Iviewit
for More on the iViewit Technology Go to
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.iViewit.TV
Friday, September 10, 2010
Eliot Bernstein On Iviewit Stolen Technologies.. Interview Transcript..
"In fact, you and I spoke the other day about Expose Corrupt Court’s Frank Brady aka McKeown’s radio interview the other day on the public office corruption exposed in New York.
In that interview, McKeown details many of the victims’ stories he is investigating and he claimed that interference with family and friends of the victims was a central theme to these lawyers deviance, in all of these cases they destabilize the victim from friends and family through some shady practices revealed recently in the press.
The courts and ethics departments illegally spy on targeted individuals and use that information to cause all kinds of damages to relations with businesses, family and friends, all part of disabling any attack against them by the victims of their crimes or anyone thinking of helping them. You would think that this cannot be true but…
Dick, if you give me a second here, I will pull up an article that will give you some perspective into how this invasion and destruction of your privacy works.
The article from Expose Corrupt Court involves the Heads of the New York Supreme Court First Department where Christine Anderson worked, using ILLEGAL satellite intercepts, in Violation of a host of Title 18 crimes and invasions of privacy.
Here we have a New York Supreme Court now illegally intercepting confidential American Citizens’ communications, on their enemies, not Foreign Terrorists but US Citizens and businesspeople they are robbing.
They use the information to gain access to Americans protected and private information and sabotage them. Let me QUOTE the Article directly because again, you cannot make this stuff up Dick, it says,
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
New York Ethics Scandal Tied to International Espionage Scheme - Tammany Hall II Ethics Scandal Reaching New Heights
Reports surfaced in New York and around Washington, D.C. last week detailing a massive communications satellite espionage scheme involving major multi-national corporations and the interception of top-secret satellite signals.
The evidence in the corporate eavesdropping cover-up “is frightening,” according to an informed source who has reviewed the volumes of documentation. The espionage scheme, he says, is directly tied to the growing state bar ethics scandal at the Appellate Division First Department, Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) in Manhattan.
Rumors had been Circulating Linking the New York Bar Scandal to International Corporate Espionage Ops Using Satellites
The highflying spy operation involves private and public companies, mainly in the U.S. and Europe, that operate apart- but not too far- from national intelligence services.
Confidential sources have learned that the original source of much of the secret information comes from satellite intercepts sold by telecom companies under contract to government spy agencies.
Although it’s rarely addressed in any official proceedings, basically all private telephone conversations and email transmissions in the U.S., and essentially worldwide, are routinely intercepted by one government authority or another. Much of the work is done by independent telecom companies that transmit the signals on to giant computers that translate the text in real time.
This instant translation capability put an end to many embarrassing backlogs, as in the case of the first World Trade Center bombing, where the FBI had received an intercept, but hadn’t translated the key incriminating conversation before that 1993 event.
Once translated, the reviewing super computers search for key words to flag suspect conversations and transmissions. Proper names of people, buildings, addresses, codes, arms, explosives and the like will trip a full-scale investigation of a transcript.
Apart from the official surveillance of signal intelligence (or “sigint” in the spy trade), what confidential sources have discovered is that there is lots of freelance spying going on, where top-secret corporate information is being offered for sale to the highest bidder. The payments are allegedly made for a tip of such secrets as planned corporate acquisitions, mergers, or some very positive or negative performance reports.
Advance knowledge of corporate information, and the corresponding improper company stock activity, has long been the focus of many insider trading investigations but has not, until now, directly involved New York City’s attorney ethics committee.
One source says it’s been the ‘perfect crime.’ "The brains behind this organized scheme have thwarted attorney ethics investigations in New York, federal criminal inquiries and various civil actions around the country by simply citing ‘national security,’” says the source.
Enter the DDC, again Since this secret corporate information is sent across public telecom networks that are constantly subject to interception, the black market in top-secret corporate intel continues to grow, and it generally evades detection.
Last week, however, investigators tripped across evidence of a law firm protecting a client that had been on the selling side of corporate espionage. When complaints were filed with the New York Attorney Disciplinary Committee against the firm for a series of ethical violations, those grievances apparently disappeared into one of the now-well-known DDC black holes.
Another trusted source from outside New York has indicated that federal court filings will soon provide detailed evidence showing how the dysfunctional DDC machinery covered-up actions by certain New York attorneys involved in the corporate spying activities.
Here you can see Dick that these law firms and the state bar associations are intercepting data illegally to use against victims through invasion of privacy.
The illegally gained information allows the RICO Criminal Enterprise to find out whom their victims are talking to and what they are talking about, what information they have against them and how to sabotage them and anyone helping them economically and emotionally.
You will see from Anderson’s testimony how they then extort people and cause fear and terror in their lives and all those that attempt to expose them, Whistleblowers especially need be stopped for obvious reasons.
Dick, these tactics take a toll on the victims, their families, their friends, their employers, their companies and victimize their lives further.
When those that are supposed to be protecting you, are instead the ones further violating your rights, well utter helplessness sets in, especially when you cannot believe what is happening to you and it is hard to relate to others that the courts and lawyers are violating your rights without sounding a bit nuts.
Now, not only are the victims victimized by their attorneys but also now by the Criminals fingered by Anderson who are running the state bars, disciplinary departments, the state and federal courts and prosecutorial offices.
Yet, while you may spend years tied up in this criminal enterprise trying to defend your rights, as many of the related cases have been fighting even longer than myself and I am at a decade.
After the Anderson allegations these government agencies look more like strip bars than state bars replete with strippers in the ethics department example as we discussed.
With Spitzer busted a whorehouse at the Attorney General’s office uncovered as well and notice unlike other citizens, the privileged Spitzer evades a single day in court or jail like any other citizen caught violating the interstate transportation of hookers across state lines in violation of the Federal Mann Act would. This is just how bought the system for the criminals has become, justice a complete farce.
The bars, as we have seen in my case, allow the accused attorneys to hold public offices within the state bars, even handling complaints against themselves while they are officers and they use state bar stationary to write exoneration letters and attack the victim.
For example, Steven Krane while an officer of the Dept Anderson worked at, handled my complaints against his firm Proskauer and wrote I was a failed dot com looking for someone to blame as I said earlier and even denied that Proskauer knew anything of my patents, claiming to state officials that Rubenstein knew nothing and was being harassed too. All while he was an Officer of the Disciplinary Committee.
Thus, you see, a smear campaign is launched against the victim by those violating their public offices, the accused acting in concealed conflicts as in my case, exonerating themselves on official state letterhead while thrashing the victim. Even when busted in conflict and violation of public office, ordered for investigation, they are able to evade prosecution and not even have to respond.
The victims feel hopeless, often not seeing the conflicts blocking their due process, as the conflicts, like Krane’s and former Chief Judge Judith Kaye’s in my case are obviously concealed, the victim usually never knowing.
This abuse, despite the veracity of the victims’ claims makes it further impossible for the victim to get court or police help, when these other agencies have exonerated the criminals while acting in conflict and they work together to suppress complaints against each other.
Further, since the disciplinary departments are whitewashing attorney complaints for the prosecutors, when the victim turns to them, further abuse takes place and now you can see how the victimization is completed, Anderson showing how it flows together, wholly denying due process to the victims at every turn through a complex Obstruction of Justice.
Now, deprived of basic legal rights, the victims turn inward and become detached, paranoid and untrusting of the system of jurisprudence, the system as a whole and it wears them down.
I am sure it has led to many suicides, in fact, one of the legally related cases to Anderson is Frank Brady aka McKeown who claims his brother committed suicide over a case involving stolen Red Cross Victims funds for the 9/11 victims, again attorneys committing crimes.
I mean really, stealing money from the 9/11 victims, from concentration camp survivors, have they no shame?
The victims I have met since Anderson blew the whistle, including those directly legally related by Judge Scheindlin to my case, are all good honest hard working Americans from all walks of life.
All similarly deprived of their rights and properties and sent into an infinite loop of injustice by criminals again disguised as trusted lawyers, prosecutors and judicial officials handling their complaints and lawsuits and denying them due process in a fair and impartial court of law.
OK so back to Christine Anderson and her heroic Whistleblowing efforts, once Anderson’s lawsuit was filed Dick, Brady/McKeown enticed several people to file lawsuits with federal judge Shira Scheindlin seeking to be legally related to the Anderson lawsuit.
Brady had an intimate knowledge of the New York Courts and as I mentioned he was prior employed by the First Department where Cahill, Anderson and Corrado worked. Brady also had insiders at the US District Court Southern District of New York where we filed.
I filed a Federal RICO and Antitrust lawsuit and was one of several suits that Scheindlin factually and legally related to the Anderson case, Scheindlin then booked my lawsuit as a RICO Lawsuit.
I filed a Federal RICO and Antitrust lawsuit and was one of several suits that Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin legally related to the Anderson case, it is for 12 counts at 1 trillion per count. Dick, additionally, many others who have cases of injustice that Scheindlin has legally related to Anderson are right out of movies.
Start with me, the inventor with attorneys ripping off inventions they deem the QUOTE Holy Grail and then pulling a coup on the government to hold off prosecution.
I will take a moment to outline some of these cases based on information and belief from learning of their accounts.
Another victim we already discussed is holocaust survivor, Gizella Weisshaus who won the largest settlement for Holocaust Survivors against Nazi funded Swiss banks, only then to be ripped off by her Attorneys, imagine how low these lawyers, including Jewish attorneys, found ripping off Auschwitz survivors have morally digressed.
Then, another lawsuit involves a woman, Luisa Esposito, sexually molested by her Attorney Allan Isaacs and extorted for oral felacio to compensate his swine filled face in addition to his already piggish legal feels.
Esposito, then caught Isaac on tape, having a private investigator wire her up and whereby Isaac while being taped attempted to get oral sex for fees. Then Isaac, boasting his bestiality to Esposito while sexually assaulting her, astonishingly claimed he could fix major cases in New York, including a major one involving the Phen Phen lawsuit.
Again we see how the protected lawyers and law firms control the New York Supreme Court and how easily cases are fixed by those “favored lawyers and law firms” with the dirty judges, affecting huge lawsuits and damaging thousands of plaintiffs in those matters on the other side of the fix, Anderson again shows the underbelly of how this works. Isaac claimed to Esposito in his perverse lust that he had contacts with dirty judges who could fix anything in New York.
Another case involves Pamela Carvel, daughter to ice cream magnet Tom Carvel, whose father’s estate she claims was stolen by her attorneys, an estate worth hundreds of millions. This has led to requests to exhume Carvel’s body after years at rest, to investigate if there was foul play involved in his death by his trusted legal advisors.
There are victims in boatloads in New York who have had their children taken away to make money off the kids, as was recently exposed in neighboring Philly where the judicial folks have conflicting interests in the facilities housing children.
Parents whose children have been taken, detained and drugged with convictions from judges who own an equity interest in the prisons. For profit prison factories that these sick judges have ownership interest and profit directly from filled cells, again only criminals dressed up as judges would conceive of such.
There are good lawyers trying to get justice who have run into the fix unknowingly and have tried to defend their clients against the mob legal system only to have been targeted and disbarred, some without a single complaint against them by a client.
Finally, there is a concert pianist, Suzanne McCormick, again with claims of foul play of estates and trusts by attorneys. I would like to highlight Suzanne’s estate case, since this seems to be a big racket for the criminal enterprise dating back years and I will give your viewers some basic information I have gained about the case, so that they may take safer routes than trusting professionals as trustees….
Dick I want to read just some headlines of how perverse these corruptions have become. STOP READ KUSE HEADLINES.
From an October 2009 article, “Battle between states, feds brewing over unclaimed bonds,” where in one state the numbers are in the billions from old unclaimed WWII bonds and this could be a massive liability throughout the country and again lawyers are knee deep in the trouble arising.
From the Daily Freeman “Family swindled elderly of $1M, prosecutors say” Let me quote some pieces from this horrendous story
From the NY Post, “House ‘Robbers’ Judge’s brother was swindler in homes sales: DA
From the Daily News “5-15 for att’y who preyed on disabled”
All of these stories relate to victims of attorneys and judges acting through the courts in criminal conspiracy, all the victims denied due process and procedure, cases whitewashed, documents destroyed and all legally abused by the legal system.
This while the very people supposed to be protecting them have stolen their properties, there is even a DuPont whose estate is involved in these matters.
This shows that the criminal enterprise is truly after large estates, large real estate properties, large intellectual properties and large personal properties.
I refer to all of these victims and the heroic Whistleblowers as a group of angels, angels fighting a corrupt justice system at a grassroots level every day, waking the public up at great personal sacrifice.
These are Patriotic Americans that have been wronged and did not just walk away or collapse from the schemes against them but hang in there fighting with every resource they have against a failed justice system that is supposed to be there for us and protecting us. These are all heroes, all soldiers in a front line battle to protect their Constitutional rights and yours, for sooner or later, if the problem remains it will certainly effect an ever growing population.
There is another class of heroes Dick that deserve mention here, who have already put their lives on the line for me and for no apparent reason other than their true Patriotism, which has affected their lives ever since.
For example Dick, one of our best computer technicians, Anthony Frenden who was instrumental in furthering the inventions to mainstream users, was one of the people who fingered Utley and crew trying to bribe employees to steal proprietary information and equipment and made his statements in a written statement for submission to investigators, a heroic undirected selfless act.
There was David Colter of Warner Bros., Doug Chey head of Sony Digital and many others at Warner Bros. who told the truth of what was going on and at that moment, not only did our friendship end but I have not spoken to most of these people since, as everything was shut down on them after their exposures. Again, this is how they interfere and destroy anyone attempting to aid their victims.
There is Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe of the New York Supreme Court First Department who worked in the same court as Anderson who busted Krane and Kaye and Cahill and Rubenstein and Proskauer and directed me to file the Motion that led to orders for Investigation by the First Department of the whole rotten gang.
Her life changed almost overnight, g-d knows if she suffered what Anderson went through at the hands of the likes of Cahill and Cohen. Or if Judith Kaye and her Pork Sour Smelly Rose deceased husband Stephen Kaye put the pressure on her directly but overnight she was moved from Clerk of the State Supreme Court to Clerk of what has been called the dirtiest court in the land, the Federal New York Second Circuit or more aptly Circus.
I have already issued a Citizen’s arrest for the Judges and Clerks of the Circus Court and others, including O’Hagan Wolfe, Defendant and Hero in my story, inextricably tied to Iviewit and Patentgate, yet once a hero, always a hero, since your life can change from that moment of your heroism with people threatening you and your family.
Threats from the top, nowhere to turn and herein you have the answer why many people do not come forward. As Anderson shows, they fire you after physically assaulting you, they intercept your calls, they post your private medical records on line to violate you as the Attorney General did to Anderson and note the Attorney General is representing against a state whistleblower, get it Dick, this makes being a hero almost impossible but again these appear angels.
There are my many close friends and Iviewit employees who by even being associated with this have put their lives in danger. Many lost their jobs overnight when Iviewit was shut down overnight, their stocks issued wholly in question with no answer from our former attorneys to the hundreds of questions by shareholders and fearful to help me for fear of retribution against their families.
I have ever asked for their help, since I do not want to get anyone hurt but there are angels Dick who fear no evil. Since the plan involved killing inventors, other inventors even requested having their names removed from the patents in fear and again you can see the fear created in these people, especially when they see me having a car bomb here in good ole USA with no investigation.
These Racketeering activities are what terrorize people from wanting to come forward or help victims, economic catastrophe, personal and family risks, this is one must endure to come forward.
For me personally, it is even hard to get a new job and bring this whole mess into someone’s life, car bombing’s and federal investigations on job applications leave you highly unemployable and you can see it can destroy lives in so many insipid ways.
There is hero Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown, the investigative blogger and possible government agent, who put this whole thing into the public domain, into the federal courts, into the highest levels of New York politics and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee. Brady has gone to Washington, appealed to equally powerful House and Senate Judiciary Committees at the Federal Level, and started grass roots efforts for victims of the system.
Brady, who brought a whistleblower to Federal Court to tell her story and reveal a mass Criminal Enterprise inside government at huge personal risk to both he and Anderson and all the other brave New Yorkers taking on the corruption head on from the inside out.
Frank is a superhero of sorts, he should be the next Governor or New York Attorney General or Department of Justice Attorney General, as integrity like his is near impossible to find these days.
These true American Patriots need no lapel pins. Heroes who believe in our country and are ready to die for country and like all Patriotic Americans feel duty bound to protect freedom for all when their government fails.
At some point they become Heroes doing this to protect other innocent people from becoming victims, it is not about winning their rights back at some point, it is about tearing down the wall of corruption to protect others.
These true Patriotic Heroes have risked it all to wake you up to what is going on in America by Domestic Terrorists, putting their lives and everything in them on lines, so listen up and demand change.
Their lives have been affected from the moment the come in contact with these “favored lawyers and law firms” and Anderson and Corrado show from insider perspectives how horrifying the consequences are.
There is a new hero, Crystal Cox, an Investigative Blogger, imagine that, reporter who actually investigates versus lip syncs, who angelically fell from the sky to write about and bring light to all of these victims stories.
Exposure with a breath of real investigative journalism based on the facts, illustrating to how the Criminal Enterprise Operates and how broad the range of victims are piling up. In a world of news propaganda script read by bobble heads, a rebel yell to alert the People, a sounding of the trumpets of the angels is necessary to raise awareness.
I thought all the rebels had been doped up since kindergarten to keep them tame in class and suppress any rebel genes.
It would be good if the People who hear this message, this passive call to arms, pass this story and the other victims stories to as many people as they know.
May the stories spread and touch as many people lives as use my inventions in their lives daily and hopefully we can enlighten others who are suffering similar fates without knowledge of how they are being scammed and prevent others from getting scammed in the first place.
There are all those People who have believed in Iviewit and supported Iviewit throughout all this, who with every bit of help put themselves at further risk but cared not, these are the Patriotic Americans who are not afraid to face the tyranny in exposing truth.
This is a growing force, especially with the number of victims piling up monthly is higher than any time period in my life. As I said before, just look at the victims of the financial collapse and you can see unregulated regulators coupled with corrupt attorneys and judges have ruined MILLIONS of US Citizen’s lives, all from the actions or inactions they allowed with intent, again stuffing their swine filled faces on others sufferings.
This Coup now perhaps the greatest threat to law and our nation, the greatest enemy of our modern history, an enemy who has disabled the citizens rights and is now robbing them blind of years of hard work and all their finances, snickering behind their backs.
Again, 10 years ago, at the dawning of the Coups mass infiltration of government with the stolen election of Bush and the planting of some really scary unqualified people throughout our system, the General Public had a hard time digesting this could really be happening in America. 10 years later and almost every person worldwide now believes our government responsible for war and economic crimes committed by our leaders that were personally to benefit their greed-lined pockets. Over 50% of New Yorkers now believe the official 9.11 account is FALSE and the number is far higher throughout the world.
It is just hard to imagine how our children have sold out America, sold out the middle class, sold out our military heroes who fought and died for our Freedoms.
These elitist Americans have soiled the great name of our Nation, debasing us to a nation of torture and hate and hate of our neighbors and friends, all for a buck, makes me sick.
How any of these new billionaires and multimillionaires really earned their fortunes other than through market rigging and products like derivatives of this elitist 2 percent that control most of the money since Bush redistributed wealth in unprecedented and illegal ways to these crooks.
Rich by gaming the system and stealing the values of peoples’ homes, stealing their pensions, retirement accounts, stocks and jobs. All the while paying themselves billions in bonuses from the companies they are bankrupting, off the people who then lose their jobs and lives savings.
These Ivy League idiots bonus themselves while People are being evicted and thrown out of their homes as a direct result of their carefully planned economic terrorism, right in their victims faces.
I cannot understand how they walk about with their heads held high amongst the People, proud of their role in our history, a role of Treason and Sedition, proud of the way they have earned their way in America, crime. I believe since they have now been caught in most these crimes, history in time will tell the true story, staining these Traitors for what they are.
I always say a Presidential legacy is great if the President escapes office without his scandals unfolding, just like Reagan with Iran Contra which forced him to Altzheimers to evade prosecution for Iran Contra. Bush and Obama well they are caught in crimes against the nation while in office and now it is a matter of time to unravel their Coup and then try and fry them.
As always Dick, frying pans free @ www.iviewit.tv , Brady, after Anderson filed suit, then claimed that there were going to be New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings in New York spearheaded by Committee Chair Senator John Sampson and lo and behold Dick, the Committee has now begun hearings.
The Committee is impaneling a Task Force and has allowed Anderson and many of the victims to testify before the Committee. Things are beginning to unravel fast on these Coupsters, the cat is out of the bag and the finger pointing is starting and goes all the way to the top.
Just in Anderson’s claims alone, US Attorneys, New York Supreme Court Officials, District Attorneys, Favored Unknown Lawyers and Law Firms all publically exposed.
The Coupsters exposed have had criminal complaints filed against them by me and others and since Anderson has revealed all of this to the highest authorities in the nation I am certain they are investigating or as I mentioned, such failure would now make them criminal accomplices through further Obstruction.
I wonder Dick if Cuomo has notified his base of supporters for his gubernatorial candidacy of his offices involvement in the Anderson affairs at this point in his run for Governor.
Anderson’s claims have tentacles you can hardly imagine Dick and may prove to be the tip of one of the most insipid crimes ever committed in our nation’s history, involving many Public Officials in the highest offices of Justice and government and in New York may be the largest government corruption case in history.
Dick, while I was in New York at the Anderson hearings, I was also invited to speak at a Coast Guard event at the Homeland Security Building by a group of Dedicated and Decorated Military Officers dedicated to protecting our democracy.
The gentleman, another hero, a military Star who introduced me to this truly Patriotic Group claimed he was dedicated to protecting our nation from DOMESTIC TERRORISM and claimed that he took oath to protect our country from not only foreign terrorist but domestic terrorists.
He claimed he was more afraid of domestic terrorists than foreign terrorists and by domestic terrorists he meant those dressed as Politicians, Judges, Lawyers, Regulators, etc. referring to them as the real domestic threat to our great nation.
With Brady’s assistance, I filed my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT against Proskauer, Foley, the New York and Florida Supreme Courts, hosts of judges, public officials and hosts of others and Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin marked my Federal RICO lawsuit LEGALLY RELATED to Anderson.
A RICO is Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit, used for organized crime rings operating in legal conspiracy to commit crimes across an array of Title 18 and other felony statutes.
I was not planning on filing lawsuits in New York after learning of the corruption and was preparing for a filing elsewhere but Brady convinced me that I should support the heroic Whistleblowing efforts of Anderson, right in the Lion’s Den and I agreed and followed.
Other Defendants in my lawsuit include former pimp Elliot Spitzer, Andrew Cuomo, the New York Attorney General’s offices, The Florida Bar, now sitting Florida Supreme Court Judge Jorge Labarga ( who was promoted to the Florida Court after his service to the criminal enterprise in the Bush v. Gore election and his efforts in derailing the Iviewit matters ), the Virginia Supreme Court, the Virginia Bar, thousands of lawyers and companies involved in the theft and infringement of my intellectual properties.
Hopefully, all of these State and Federal Defendants have been properly reporting these massive liabilities to state and federal auditors for proper reporting of the liabilities.
Reporting the liabilities of the lawsuit and patent infringement claims encumbered to their insurance carriers, bondholders and others with liability for their actions. To date all of them have hidden the liabilities from the states and the public.
Dick, I am a perfect example of a typical victim of this legal abuse. I was a college graduate with a BS in Psychology and minor in Astronomy.
I worked from high school through college every day and I paid off my student loans having put myself through school, despite coming from a wealthy family, which I had always taken very little from preferring to make my life on my own.
I operated a business from my college dorm and moved it to California with my college friends where we sold insurance to mostly millionaires and billionaires out of our garage for 10 years.
I was well off, had earned everything I had in life and was proud to be a part of America and the American dream. I then invented technologies that changed the world and again I thought I had made it in America by playing by the rules and getting ahead through honest and hard work.
I put together Iviewit, hired what appeared top law firms, I had driven the value of the company up to about a quarter of a billion dollars with the Wachovia Private Placement and was on the way to an Internet IPO in the billions. The American dream earned the hard way, hard work, not the politician or ROT way of hardly workin’.
I had and have not done anything wrong to these people, as I have not stolen their intellectual properties or violated any laws against them and their families.
I have played by their rules in their courts and they have violated every one of them to deny me due process and procedure. I am not a terrorist, so all of these violations of my rights, including invading my privacy to use against me are just violations of an honest hard working American.
Therefore, it could happen to you or your family next, when they want your properties and again, in light of the mortgage and banking fraud ongoing, millions of Americans are realizing they too are being screwed by these same schemes.
Again, these are honest hard working middle class Americans, not some shoddy morally corrupt people that are being violated who did anything to deserve what has happened to them.
Again, imagine that based on Anderson’s Whistleblowing alone, as the information surfaces to the public, thousands of court cases and thousands of investigations in New York will have to be Re-examined to see if corruption was the cause of the outcome.
There may already be millions upon millions of victims who did not even know the fix was in on their cases, or knew but did not have the means or evidence to prove it at the time and now all that changes with Anderson, all these cases may be appealable due to corruption.
First off, in my case, from a victim viewpoint, when these powerful and now protected law firms as Anderson describes them were caught committing Fraud on US Government agencies you can see that this was an explosive moment in history where they had to stop me at all costs.
As explosive a moment, as that of my inventions, this criminal historical moment changed my world henceforth but also transformed the world as we know it.
Your viewers really cannot understand U.S. history and how and why the country traversed to the lows we are now suffering, without first knowing the Iviewit Patentgate story and who was involved and how the cover-up crimes were effectuated, including understanding how the Coup took control of the government.
One must understand how the Fox got in the henhouse in the first place, to understand that the Fox definitely is in the henhouse and victims are piling up daily to their crimes since that moment back in 1999-2000. That moment in criminal history then snowballed starting with Brian Utley caught with the illegal patents in his possession, which included the patent applications filed fraudulently by Foley & Lardner conspiring with Proskauer.
From that moment forward, evil forces began to collide and collude together, they formed a plot to go for the whole enchilada, a full on coup d’état on all three branches of government, if they failed, they were on their way to prison perhaps for life, loss of all assets, so what did they have to lose. "
Eliot Bernstein
Iviewit Founder
www.Iviewit.TV
In that interview, McKeown details many of the victims’ stories he is investigating and he claimed that interference with family and friends of the victims was a central theme to these lawyers deviance, in all of these cases they destabilize the victim from friends and family through some shady practices revealed recently in the press.
The courts and ethics departments illegally spy on targeted individuals and use that information to cause all kinds of damages to relations with businesses, family and friends, all part of disabling any attack against them by the victims of their crimes or anyone thinking of helping them. You would think that this cannot be true but…
Dick, if you give me a second here, I will pull up an article that will give you some perspective into how this invasion and destruction of your privacy works.
The article from Expose Corrupt Court involves the Heads of the New York Supreme Court First Department where Christine Anderson worked, using ILLEGAL satellite intercepts, in Violation of a host of Title 18 crimes and invasions of privacy.
Here we have a New York Supreme Court now illegally intercepting confidential American Citizens’ communications, on their enemies, not Foreign Terrorists but US Citizens and businesspeople they are robbing.
They use the information to gain access to Americans protected and private information and sabotage them. Let me QUOTE the Article directly because again, you cannot make this stuff up Dick, it says,
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
New York Ethics Scandal Tied to International Espionage Scheme - Tammany Hall II Ethics Scandal Reaching New Heights
Reports surfaced in New York and around Washington, D.C. last week detailing a massive communications satellite espionage scheme involving major multi-national corporations and the interception of top-secret satellite signals.
The evidence in the corporate eavesdropping cover-up “is frightening,” according to an informed source who has reviewed the volumes of documentation. The espionage scheme, he says, is directly tied to the growing state bar ethics scandal at the Appellate Division First Department, Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) in Manhattan.
Rumors had been Circulating Linking the New York Bar Scandal to International Corporate Espionage Ops Using Satellites
The highflying spy operation involves private and public companies, mainly in the U.S. and Europe, that operate apart- but not too far- from national intelligence services.
Confidential sources have learned that the original source of much of the secret information comes from satellite intercepts sold by telecom companies under contract to government spy agencies.
Although it’s rarely addressed in any official proceedings, basically all private telephone conversations and email transmissions in the U.S., and essentially worldwide, are routinely intercepted by one government authority or another. Much of the work is done by independent telecom companies that transmit the signals on to giant computers that translate the text in real time.
This instant translation capability put an end to many embarrassing backlogs, as in the case of the first World Trade Center bombing, where the FBI had received an intercept, but hadn’t translated the key incriminating conversation before that 1993 event.
Once translated, the reviewing super computers search for key words to flag suspect conversations and transmissions. Proper names of people, buildings, addresses, codes, arms, explosives and the like will trip a full-scale investigation of a transcript.
Apart from the official surveillance of signal intelligence (or “sigint” in the spy trade), what confidential sources have discovered is that there is lots of freelance spying going on, where top-secret corporate information is being offered for sale to the highest bidder. The payments are allegedly made for a tip of such secrets as planned corporate acquisitions, mergers, or some very positive or negative performance reports.
Advance knowledge of corporate information, and the corresponding improper company stock activity, has long been the focus of many insider trading investigations but has not, until now, directly involved New York City’s attorney ethics committee.
One source says it’s been the ‘perfect crime.’ "The brains behind this organized scheme have thwarted attorney ethics investigations in New York, federal criminal inquiries and various civil actions around the country by simply citing ‘national security,’” says the source.
Enter the DDC, again Since this secret corporate information is sent across public telecom networks that are constantly subject to interception, the black market in top-secret corporate intel continues to grow, and it generally evades detection.
Last week, however, investigators tripped across evidence of a law firm protecting a client that had been on the selling side of corporate espionage. When complaints were filed with the New York Attorney Disciplinary Committee against the firm for a series of ethical violations, those grievances apparently disappeared into one of the now-well-known DDC black holes.
Another trusted source from outside New York has indicated that federal court filings will soon provide detailed evidence showing how the dysfunctional DDC machinery covered-up actions by certain New York attorneys involved in the corporate spying activities.
Here you can see Dick that these law firms and the state bar associations are intercepting data illegally to use against victims through invasion of privacy.
The illegally gained information allows the RICO Criminal Enterprise to find out whom their victims are talking to and what they are talking about, what information they have against them and how to sabotage them and anyone helping them economically and emotionally.
You will see from Anderson’s testimony how they then extort people and cause fear and terror in their lives and all those that attempt to expose them, Whistleblowers especially need be stopped for obvious reasons.
Dick, these tactics take a toll on the victims, their families, their friends, their employers, their companies and victimize their lives further.
When those that are supposed to be protecting you, are instead the ones further violating your rights, well utter helplessness sets in, especially when you cannot believe what is happening to you and it is hard to relate to others that the courts and lawyers are violating your rights without sounding a bit nuts.
Now, not only are the victims victimized by their attorneys but also now by the Criminals fingered by Anderson who are running the state bars, disciplinary departments, the state and federal courts and prosecutorial offices.
Yet, while you may spend years tied up in this criminal enterprise trying to defend your rights, as many of the related cases have been fighting even longer than myself and I am at a decade.
After the Anderson allegations these government agencies look more like strip bars than state bars replete with strippers in the ethics department example as we discussed.
With Spitzer busted a whorehouse at the Attorney General’s office uncovered as well and notice unlike other citizens, the privileged Spitzer evades a single day in court or jail like any other citizen caught violating the interstate transportation of hookers across state lines in violation of the Federal Mann Act would. This is just how bought the system for the criminals has become, justice a complete farce.
The bars, as we have seen in my case, allow the accused attorneys to hold public offices within the state bars, even handling complaints against themselves while they are officers and they use state bar stationary to write exoneration letters and attack the victim.
For example, Steven Krane while an officer of the Dept Anderson worked at, handled my complaints against his firm Proskauer and wrote I was a failed dot com looking for someone to blame as I said earlier and even denied that Proskauer knew anything of my patents, claiming to state officials that Rubenstein knew nothing and was being harassed too. All while he was an Officer of the Disciplinary Committee.
Thus, you see, a smear campaign is launched against the victim by those violating their public offices, the accused acting in concealed conflicts as in my case, exonerating themselves on official state letterhead while thrashing the victim. Even when busted in conflict and violation of public office, ordered for investigation, they are able to evade prosecution and not even have to respond.
The victims feel hopeless, often not seeing the conflicts blocking their due process, as the conflicts, like Krane’s and former Chief Judge Judith Kaye’s in my case are obviously concealed, the victim usually never knowing.
This abuse, despite the veracity of the victims’ claims makes it further impossible for the victim to get court or police help, when these other agencies have exonerated the criminals while acting in conflict and they work together to suppress complaints against each other.
Further, since the disciplinary departments are whitewashing attorney complaints for the prosecutors, when the victim turns to them, further abuse takes place and now you can see how the victimization is completed, Anderson showing how it flows together, wholly denying due process to the victims at every turn through a complex Obstruction of Justice.
Now, deprived of basic legal rights, the victims turn inward and become detached, paranoid and untrusting of the system of jurisprudence, the system as a whole and it wears them down.
I am sure it has led to many suicides, in fact, one of the legally related cases to Anderson is Frank Brady aka McKeown who claims his brother committed suicide over a case involving stolen Red Cross Victims funds for the 9/11 victims, again attorneys committing crimes.
I mean really, stealing money from the 9/11 victims, from concentration camp survivors, have they no shame?
The victims I have met since Anderson blew the whistle, including those directly legally related by Judge Scheindlin to my case, are all good honest hard working Americans from all walks of life.
All similarly deprived of their rights and properties and sent into an infinite loop of injustice by criminals again disguised as trusted lawyers, prosecutors and judicial officials handling their complaints and lawsuits and denying them due process in a fair and impartial court of law.
OK so back to Christine Anderson and her heroic Whistleblowing efforts, once Anderson’s lawsuit was filed Dick, Brady/McKeown enticed several people to file lawsuits with federal judge Shira Scheindlin seeking to be legally related to the Anderson lawsuit.
Brady had an intimate knowledge of the New York Courts and as I mentioned he was prior employed by the First Department where Cahill, Anderson and Corrado worked. Brady also had insiders at the US District Court Southern District of New York where we filed.
I filed a Federal RICO and Antitrust lawsuit and was one of several suits that Scheindlin factually and legally related to the Anderson case, Scheindlin then booked my lawsuit as a RICO Lawsuit.
I filed a Federal RICO and Antitrust lawsuit and was one of several suits that Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin legally related to the Anderson case, it is for 12 counts at 1 trillion per count. Dick, additionally, many others who have cases of injustice that Scheindlin has legally related to Anderson are right out of movies.
Start with me, the inventor with attorneys ripping off inventions they deem the QUOTE Holy Grail and then pulling a coup on the government to hold off prosecution.
I will take a moment to outline some of these cases based on information and belief from learning of their accounts.
Another victim we already discussed is holocaust survivor, Gizella Weisshaus who won the largest settlement for Holocaust Survivors against Nazi funded Swiss banks, only then to be ripped off by her Attorneys, imagine how low these lawyers, including Jewish attorneys, found ripping off Auschwitz survivors have morally digressed.
Then, another lawsuit involves a woman, Luisa Esposito, sexually molested by her Attorney Allan Isaacs and extorted for oral felacio to compensate his swine filled face in addition to his already piggish legal feels.
Esposito, then caught Isaac on tape, having a private investigator wire her up and whereby Isaac while being taped attempted to get oral sex for fees. Then Isaac, boasting his bestiality to Esposito while sexually assaulting her, astonishingly claimed he could fix major cases in New York, including a major one involving the Phen Phen lawsuit.
Again we see how the protected lawyers and law firms control the New York Supreme Court and how easily cases are fixed by those “favored lawyers and law firms” with the dirty judges, affecting huge lawsuits and damaging thousands of plaintiffs in those matters on the other side of the fix, Anderson again shows the underbelly of how this works. Isaac claimed to Esposito in his perverse lust that he had contacts with dirty judges who could fix anything in New York.
Another case involves Pamela Carvel, daughter to ice cream magnet Tom Carvel, whose father’s estate she claims was stolen by her attorneys, an estate worth hundreds of millions. This has led to requests to exhume Carvel’s body after years at rest, to investigate if there was foul play involved in his death by his trusted legal advisors.
There are victims in boatloads in New York who have had their children taken away to make money off the kids, as was recently exposed in neighboring Philly where the judicial folks have conflicting interests in the facilities housing children.
Parents whose children have been taken, detained and drugged with convictions from judges who own an equity interest in the prisons. For profit prison factories that these sick judges have ownership interest and profit directly from filled cells, again only criminals dressed up as judges would conceive of such.
There are good lawyers trying to get justice who have run into the fix unknowingly and have tried to defend their clients against the mob legal system only to have been targeted and disbarred, some without a single complaint against them by a client.
Finally, there is a concert pianist, Suzanne McCormick, again with claims of foul play of estates and trusts by attorneys. I would like to highlight Suzanne’s estate case, since this seems to be a big racket for the criminal enterprise dating back years and I will give your viewers some basic information I have gained about the case, so that they may take safer routes than trusting professionals as trustees….
Dick I want to read just some headlines of how perverse these corruptions have become. STOP READ KUSE HEADLINES.
From an October 2009 article, “Battle between states, feds brewing over unclaimed bonds,” where in one state the numbers are in the billions from old unclaimed WWII bonds and this could be a massive liability throughout the country and again lawyers are knee deep in the trouble arising.
From the Daily Freeman “Family swindled elderly of $1M, prosecutors say” Let me quote some pieces from this horrendous story
From the NY Post, “House ‘Robbers’ Judge’s brother was swindler in homes sales: DA
From the Daily News “5-15 for att’y who preyed on disabled”
All of these stories relate to victims of attorneys and judges acting through the courts in criminal conspiracy, all the victims denied due process and procedure, cases whitewashed, documents destroyed and all legally abused by the legal system.
This while the very people supposed to be protecting them have stolen their properties, there is even a DuPont whose estate is involved in these matters.
This shows that the criminal enterprise is truly after large estates, large real estate properties, large intellectual properties and large personal properties.
I refer to all of these victims and the heroic Whistleblowers as a group of angels, angels fighting a corrupt justice system at a grassroots level every day, waking the public up at great personal sacrifice.
These are Patriotic Americans that have been wronged and did not just walk away or collapse from the schemes against them but hang in there fighting with every resource they have against a failed justice system that is supposed to be there for us and protecting us. These are all heroes, all soldiers in a front line battle to protect their Constitutional rights and yours, for sooner or later, if the problem remains it will certainly effect an ever growing population.
There is another class of heroes Dick that deserve mention here, who have already put their lives on the line for me and for no apparent reason other than their true Patriotism, which has affected their lives ever since.
For example Dick, one of our best computer technicians, Anthony Frenden who was instrumental in furthering the inventions to mainstream users, was one of the people who fingered Utley and crew trying to bribe employees to steal proprietary information and equipment and made his statements in a written statement for submission to investigators, a heroic undirected selfless act.
There was David Colter of Warner Bros., Doug Chey head of Sony Digital and many others at Warner Bros. who told the truth of what was going on and at that moment, not only did our friendship end but I have not spoken to most of these people since, as everything was shut down on them after their exposures. Again, this is how they interfere and destroy anyone attempting to aid their victims.
There is Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe of the New York Supreme Court First Department who worked in the same court as Anderson who busted Krane and Kaye and Cahill and Rubenstein and Proskauer and directed me to file the Motion that led to orders for Investigation by the First Department of the whole rotten gang.
Her life changed almost overnight, g-d knows if she suffered what Anderson went through at the hands of the likes of Cahill and Cohen. Or if Judith Kaye and her Pork Sour Smelly Rose deceased husband Stephen Kaye put the pressure on her directly but overnight she was moved from Clerk of the State Supreme Court to Clerk of what has been called the dirtiest court in the land, the Federal New York Second Circuit or more aptly Circus.
I have already issued a Citizen’s arrest for the Judges and Clerks of the Circus Court and others, including O’Hagan Wolfe, Defendant and Hero in my story, inextricably tied to Iviewit and Patentgate, yet once a hero, always a hero, since your life can change from that moment of your heroism with people threatening you and your family.
Threats from the top, nowhere to turn and herein you have the answer why many people do not come forward. As Anderson shows, they fire you after physically assaulting you, they intercept your calls, they post your private medical records on line to violate you as the Attorney General did to Anderson and note the Attorney General is representing against a state whistleblower, get it Dick, this makes being a hero almost impossible but again these appear angels.
There are my many close friends and Iviewit employees who by even being associated with this have put their lives in danger. Many lost their jobs overnight when Iviewit was shut down overnight, their stocks issued wholly in question with no answer from our former attorneys to the hundreds of questions by shareholders and fearful to help me for fear of retribution against their families.
I have ever asked for their help, since I do not want to get anyone hurt but there are angels Dick who fear no evil. Since the plan involved killing inventors, other inventors even requested having their names removed from the patents in fear and again you can see the fear created in these people, especially when they see me having a car bomb here in good ole USA with no investigation.
These Racketeering activities are what terrorize people from wanting to come forward or help victims, economic catastrophe, personal and family risks, this is one must endure to come forward.
For me personally, it is even hard to get a new job and bring this whole mess into someone’s life, car bombing’s and federal investigations on job applications leave you highly unemployable and you can see it can destroy lives in so many insipid ways.
There is hero Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown, the investigative blogger and possible government agent, who put this whole thing into the public domain, into the federal courts, into the highest levels of New York politics and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee. Brady has gone to Washington, appealed to equally powerful House and Senate Judiciary Committees at the Federal Level, and started grass roots efforts for victims of the system.
Brady, who brought a whistleblower to Federal Court to tell her story and reveal a mass Criminal Enterprise inside government at huge personal risk to both he and Anderson and all the other brave New Yorkers taking on the corruption head on from the inside out.
Frank is a superhero of sorts, he should be the next Governor or New York Attorney General or Department of Justice Attorney General, as integrity like his is near impossible to find these days.
These true American Patriots need no lapel pins. Heroes who believe in our country and are ready to die for country and like all Patriotic Americans feel duty bound to protect freedom for all when their government fails.
At some point they become Heroes doing this to protect other innocent people from becoming victims, it is not about winning their rights back at some point, it is about tearing down the wall of corruption to protect others.
These true Patriotic Heroes have risked it all to wake you up to what is going on in America by Domestic Terrorists, putting their lives and everything in them on lines, so listen up and demand change.
Their lives have been affected from the moment the come in contact with these “favored lawyers and law firms” and Anderson and Corrado show from insider perspectives how horrifying the consequences are.
There is a new hero, Crystal Cox, an Investigative Blogger, imagine that, reporter who actually investigates versus lip syncs, who angelically fell from the sky to write about and bring light to all of these victims stories.
Exposure with a breath of real investigative journalism based on the facts, illustrating to how the Criminal Enterprise Operates and how broad the range of victims are piling up. In a world of news propaganda script read by bobble heads, a rebel yell to alert the People, a sounding of the trumpets of the angels is necessary to raise awareness.
I thought all the rebels had been doped up since kindergarten to keep them tame in class and suppress any rebel genes.
It would be good if the People who hear this message, this passive call to arms, pass this story and the other victims stories to as many people as they know.
May the stories spread and touch as many people lives as use my inventions in their lives daily and hopefully we can enlighten others who are suffering similar fates without knowledge of how they are being scammed and prevent others from getting scammed in the first place.
There are all those People who have believed in Iviewit and supported Iviewit throughout all this, who with every bit of help put themselves at further risk but cared not, these are the Patriotic Americans who are not afraid to face the tyranny in exposing truth.
This is a growing force, especially with the number of victims piling up monthly is higher than any time period in my life. As I said before, just look at the victims of the financial collapse and you can see unregulated regulators coupled with corrupt attorneys and judges have ruined MILLIONS of US Citizen’s lives, all from the actions or inactions they allowed with intent, again stuffing their swine filled faces on others sufferings.
This Coup now perhaps the greatest threat to law and our nation, the greatest enemy of our modern history, an enemy who has disabled the citizens rights and is now robbing them blind of years of hard work and all their finances, snickering behind their backs.
Again, 10 years ago, at the dawning of the Coups mass infiltration of government with the stolen election of Bush and the planting of some really scary unqualified people throughout our system, the General Public had a hard time digesting this could really be happening in America. 10 years later and almost every person worldwide now believes our government responsible for war and economic crimes committed by our leaders that were personally to benefit their greed-lined pockets. Over 50% of New Yorkers now believe the official 9.11 account is FALSE and the number is far higher throughout the world.
It is just hard to imagine how our children have sold out America, sold out the middle class, sold out our military heroes who fought and died for our Freedoms.
These elitist Americans have soiled the great name of our Nation, debasing us to a nation of torture and hate and hate of our neighbors and friends, all for a buck, makes me sick.
How any of these new billionaires and multimillionaires really earned their fortunes other than through market rigging and products like derivatives of this elitist 2 percent that control most of the money since Bush redistributed wealth in unprecedented and illegal ways to these crooks.
Rich by gaming the system and stealing the values of peoples’ homes, stealing their pensions, retirement accounts, stocks and jobs. All the while paying themselves billions in bonuses from the companies they are bankrupting, off the people who then lose their jobs and lives savings.
These Ivy League idiots bonus themselves while People are being evicted and thrown out of their homes as a direct result of their carefully planned economic terrorism, right in their victims faces.
I cannot understand how they walk about with their heads held high amongst the People, proud of their role in our history, a role of Treason and Sedition, proud of the way they have earned their way in America, crime. I believe since they have now been caught in most these crimes, history in time will tell the true story, staining these Traitors for what they are.
I always say a Presidential legacy is great if the President escapes office without his scandals unfolding, just like Reagan with Iran Contra which forced him to Altzheimers to evade prosecution for Iran Contra. Bush and Obama well they are caught in crimes against the nation while in office and now it is a matter of time to unravel their Coup and then try and fry them.
As always Dick, frying pans free @ www.iviewit.tv , Brady, after Anderson filed suit, then claimed that there were going to be New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings in New York spearheaded by Committee Chair Senator John Sampson and lo and behold Dick, the Committee has now begun hearings.
The Committee is impaneling a Task Force and has allowed Anderson and many of the victims to testify before the Committee. Things are beginning to unravel fast on these Coupsters, the cat is out of the bag and the finger pointing is starting and goes all the way to the top.
Just in Anderson’s claims alone, US Attorneys, New York Supreme Court Officials, District Attorneys, Favored Unknown Lawyers and Law Firms all publically exposed.
The Coupsters exposed have had criminal complaints filed against them by me and others and since Anderson has revealed all of this to the highest authorities in the nation I am certain they are investigating or as I mentioned, such failure would now make them criminal accomplices through further Obstruction.
I wonder Dick if Cuomo has notified his base of supporters for his gubernatorial candidacy of his offices involvement in the Anderson affairs at this point in his run for Governor.
Anderson’s claims have tentacles you can hardly imagine Dick and may prove to be the tip of one of the most insipid crimes ever committed in our nation’s history, involving many Public Officials in the highest offices of Justice and government and in New York may be the largest government corruption case in history.
Dick, while I was in New York at the Anderson hearings, I was also invited to speak at a Coast Guard event at the Homeland Security Building by a group of Dedicated and Decorated Military Officers dedicated to protecting our democracy.
The gentleman, another hero, a military Star who introduced me to this truly Patriotic Group claimed he was dedicated to protecting our nation from DOMESTIC TERRORISM and claimed that he took oath to protect our country from not only foreign terrorist but domestic terrorists.
He claimed he was more afraid of domestic terrorists than foreign terrorists and by domestic terrorists he meant those dressed as Politicians, Judges, Lawyers, Regulators, etc. referring to them as the real domestic threat to our great nation.
With Brady’s assistance, I filed my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT against Proskauer, Foley, the New York and Florida Supreme Courts, hosts of judges, public officials and hosts of others and Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin marked my Federal RICO lawsuit LEGALLY RELATED to Anderson.
A RICO is Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit, used for organized crime rings operating in legal conspiracy to commit crimes across an array of Title 18 and other felony statutes.
I was not planning on filing lawsuits in New York after learning of the corruption and was preparing for a filing elsewhere but Brady convinced me that I should support the heroic Whistleblowing efforts of Anderson, right in the Lion’s Den and I agreed and followed.
Other Defendants in my lawsuit include former pimp Elliot Spitzer, Andrew Cuomo, the New York Attorney General’s offices, The Florida Bar, now sitting Florida Supreme Court Judge Jorge Labarga ( who was promoted to the Florida Court after his service to the criminal enterprise in the Bush v. Gore election and his efforts in derailing the Iviewit matters ), the Virginia Supreme Court, the Virginia Bar, thousands of lawyers and companies involved in the theft and infringement of my intellectual properties.
Hopefully, all of these State and Federal Defendants have been properly reporting these massive liabilities to state and federal auditors for proper reporting of the liabilities.
Reporting the liabilities of the lawsuit and patent infringement claims encumbered to their insurance carriers, bondholders and others with liability for their actions. To date all of them have hidden the liabilities from the states and the public.
Dick, I am a perfect example of a typical victim of this legal abuse. I was a college graduate with a BS in Psychology and minor in Astronomy.
I worked from high school through college every day and I paid off my student loans having put myself through school, despite coming from a wealthy family, which I had always taken very little from preferring to make my life on my own.
I operated a business from my college dorm and moved it to California with my college friends where we sold insurance to mostly millionaires and billionaires out of our garage for 10 years.
I was well off, had earned everything I had in life and was proud to be a part of America and the American dream. I then invented technologies that changed the world and again I thought I had made it in America by playing by the rules and getting ahead through honest and hard work.
I put together Iviewit, hired what appeared top law firms, I had driven the value of the company up to about a quarter of a billion dollars with the Wachovia Private Placement and was on the way to an Internet IPO in the billions. The American dream earned the hard way, hard work, not the politician or ROT way of hardly workin’.
I had and have not done anything wrong to these people, as I have not stolen their intellectual properties or violated any laws against them and their families.
I have played by their rules in their courts and they have violated every one of them to deny me due process and procedure. I am not a terrorist, so all of these violations of my rights, including invading my privacy to use against me are just violations of an honest hard working American.
Therefore, it could happen to you or your family next, when they want your properties and again, in light of the mortgage and banking fraud ongoing, millions of Americans are realizing they too are being screwed by these same schemes.
Again, these are honest hard working middle class Americans, not some shoddy morally corrupt people that are being violated who did anything to deserve what has happened to them.
Again, imagine that based on Anderson’s Whistleblowing alone, as the information surfaces to the public, thousands of court cases and thousands of investigations in New York will have to be Re-examined to see if corruption was the cause of the outcome.
There may already be millions upon millions of victims who did not even know the fix was in on their cases, or knew but did not have the means or evidence to prove it at the time and now all that changes with Anderson, all these cases may be appealable due to corruption.
First off, in my case, from a victim viewpoint, when these powerful and now protected law firms as Anderson describes them were caught committing Fraud on US Government agencies you can see that this was an explosive moment in history where they had to stop me at all costs.
As explosive a moment, as that of my inventions, this criminal historical moment changed my world henceforth but also transformed the world as we know it.
Your viewers really cannot understand U.S. history and how and why the country traversed to the lows we are now suffering, without first knowing the Iviewit Patentgate story and who was involved and how the cover-up crimes were effectuated, including understanding how the Coup took control of the government.
One must understand how the Fox got in the henhouse in the first place, to understand that the Fox definitely is in the henhouse and victims are piling up daily to their crimes since that moment back in 1999-2000. That moment in criminal history then snowballed starting with Brian Utley caught with the illegal patents in his possession, which included the patent applications filed fraudulently by Foley & Lardner conspiring with Proskauer.
From that moment forward, evil forces began to collide and collude together, they formed a plot to go for the whole enchilada, a full on coup d’état on all three branches of government, if they failed, they were on their way to prison perhaps for life, loss of all assets, so what did they have to lose. "
Eliot Bernstein
Iviewit Founder
www.Iviewit.TV
Friday, September 3, 2010
Florida Attorney General Office Confirms Receiving Notice of Massive Florida Corruption
"" From: AG [mailto:AG@MyFloridaLegal.com]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 6:01 PM
To: iviewit@iviewit.tv
Subject: From Attorney General Bill McCollum
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum received your email regarding the Florida Bar and the Florida Supreme Court. Attorney General McCollum asked that I respond on his behalf.
Attorney General McCollum issued the following statement on the Florida Supreme Court's order to convene a statewide grand jury on public corruption:
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/newsreleases/A26DE7C27763DB94852576BD005BB1E7
The Statewide Prosecutor will serve, by law, as the statewide grand jury's counsel.
As mentioned in the above statement, our Statewide Prosecutor will work with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Florida’s state attorneys to identify investigations and cases to bring before the statewide grand jury.
I am forwarding your correspondence to the Statewide Prosecution Office for review.
However, due to the confidential nature of investigations, the Statewide Prosecution Office is not at liberty to comment further.
We will keep your concerns under advisement.
If you have not already done so, I also encourage you to convey your concerns to Governor Charlie Crist's Office at:
Office of the Governor
The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001
Telephone: (850) 488-4441
Website: http://www.flgov.com/
You should consult your private attorney for any legal advice you may need.
By law our office cannot give legal advice, statutory interpretations, or legal opinions to private individuals or businesses.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your concerns.
Sincerely,
Samantha Santana
Office of Citizen Services ""
Subject: Public Corruption Grand Jury
Refernces to Emails from Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Founder to Florida Officials
http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/09/so-what-does-bill-mccollum-florida.html
Eliot Bernstein one of the Inventors of the Stolen Multi-Trillion Dollar Technology that Intel, IBM, Sony, Warner Bros., APPLE, Lockheed Martin and Many More are Making Billions On Every Single Year and Not Disclosing the STOLEN Iviewit Intellectual Property. Eliot Bernstein Notifies Florida's AG Bill McCollum on Massive Corruption in the State of Florida.
http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/09/eliot-bernstein-notifies-governor.html
Eiliot Bernstein Contacts Governor Crist on Rampant Corruption in Florida
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 6:01 PM
To: iviewit@iviewit.tv
Subject: From Attorney General Bill McCollum
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum received your email regarding the Florida Bar and the Florida Supreme Court. Attorney General McCollum asked that I respond on his behalf.
Attorney General McCollum issued the following statement on the Florida Supreme Court's order to convene a statewide grand jury on public corruption:
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/newsreleases/A26DE7C27763DB94852576BD005BB1E7
The Statewide Prosecutor will serve, by law, as the statewide grand jury's counsel.
As mentioned in the above statement, our Statewide Prosecutor will work with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Florida’s state attorneys to identify investigations and cases to bring before the statewide grand jury.
I am forwarding your correspondence to the Statewide Prosecution Office for review.
However, due to the confidential nature of investigations, the Statewide Prosecution Office is not at liberty to comment further.
We will keep your concerns under advisement.
If you have not already done so, I also encourage you to convey your concerns to Governor Charlie Crist's Office at:
Office of the Governor
The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001
Telephone: (850) 488-4441
Website: http://www.flgov.com/
You should consult your private attorney for any legal advice you may need.
By law our office cannot give legal advice, statutory interpretations, or legal opinions to private individuals or businesses.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your concerns.
Sincerely,
Samantha Santana
Office of Citizen Services ""
Subject: Public Corruption Grand Jury
Refernces to Emails from Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Founder to Florida Officials
http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/09/so-what-does-bill-mccollum-florida.html
Eliot Bernstein one of the Inventors of the Stolen Multi-Trillion Dollar Technology that Intel, IBM, Sony, Warner Bros., APPLE, Lockheed Martin and Many More are Making Billions On Every Single Year and Not Disclosing the STOLEN Iviewit Intellectual Property. Eliot Bernstein Notifies Florida's AG Bill McCollum on Massive Corruption in the State of Florida.
http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/09/eliot-bernstein-notifies-governor.html
Eiliot Bernstein Contacts Governor Crist on Rampant Corruption in Florida
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Technologies Notifies Governor Charlie Crist of Florida Corruption at Suggestion of Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum
Eliot Bernstein Notifies Florida Governor of Massive Florida Corruption at the Suggestion of Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum.
" Friday, September 03, 2010
Hon. Governor Charlie Crist
Office of Governor Charlie Crist
State of Florida
Dear Honorable Governor Charlie Crist,
Per the Attorney General of the Great State of Florida, I write to you for inclusion into the ongoing Nineteenth Statewide Grand Jury, the Eliot Bernstein and Iviewit companies claims of criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities by certain members of the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar, the Boca Raton P.D., the law firms Proskauer Rose LLP, Foley & Lardner LLP and more.
The extent of these claims of Public Office Corruption reach the highest levels of Florida government and thus are germane to the Grand Jury’s request for information and stated purpose, “The Office of Statewide Prosecution has established a public corruption hotline for anyone who believes they have information concerning a criminal offense involving public corruption or wishes to suggest issues the Statewide Grand Jury should investigate regarding public corruption.
Below is a communication from Attorney General McCollum in response to my request to his offices for inclusion, whereby he urges me to contact and join your offices of these most serious allegations as well.
I am contacting your offices again, as I have contacted them in the past regarding these matters and am asking that your offices take all actions necessary to have these allegations investigated by the Florida Grand Jury your office has convened, as well as, any other criminal actions you may deem appropriate in investigating these matters and notifying the proper authorities of the allegations alleged herein and in the URL links provided herein.
I am happy to provide additional information or testimony relating to the matters to any investigators you deem appropriate or before the Grand Jury.
Many of these matters have crossed state lines through the law firms accused and in New York, a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq. has identified a Racketeering type organization within not only the NY Courts and NY Disciplinary Agencies but the NY prosecutorial offices, including the US Attorney, the NY Attorney General Cuomo’s offices and the NY District Attorneys Office.
The allegations rise to senior members of these public offices acting in conspiracy to deprive due process to citizens’ complaints against them and in fact, a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein of the NY Supreme Court was allegedly according to Anderson Whitewashing attorney complaints for these prosecutors. In addition, Anderson claims “favored lawyers and law firms” had their complaints cleaned as well.
The Anderson case now also involves Federal Obstruction of Justice in a federal Lawsuit, with death threats on Federal Witnesses on their way to testify in Federal Court. Extortion of state employees is also evidenced in Anderson, replete with physical assaults on the 60 yr. female Anderson, to either aid and abet or else by Senior New York Supreme Court Officials.
My Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit filed alongside and in support of Anderson’s Historic and Heroic Whistleblower claims, was legally “related” to the Anderson Whistleblower lawsuit by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin.
Many of the defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST are located here in Florida, in fact all of my claims began in Florida, as that is where my companies and myself were located at the time the criminal activities were first discovered.
Proskauer partners were ordered for Investigation for Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public office by the New York Supreme Court, in a unanimous consent of five justices of that court but those investigations are now under investigation for their failure to investigate.
The allegations in NY are almost identical to those I filed in Florida just different players from the same firms often having infiltrated and violated public offices to deny due process to my complaints in violation of law and attorney and judicial conduct codes.
All of my complaints in Florida in the courts and to all state agencies are herein officially requested to be re-opened in light of the revelations of new and damning information revealed in Anderson and new evidence against certain defendants in my lawsuit from Florida.
New evidence includes Defendant Proskauer Rose LLP and Partner Thomas Sjoblom’s involvement in the ExSir Robert Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme, Sjoblom found aiding and abetting Stanford Employees in a Miami Airport Hanger teaching them how to lie to SEC and FBI investigators.
As you know, Proskauer has been sued in a Global Class Action for the entire damages of Stanford, approximately 7 Billion US Dollars. Another thread to Florida is another Defendant in my Fed RICO, now infamous Ponzi schemer, Marc S. Dreier, Esq., who has been sentenced to 20 years for his Ponzi scheme.
Greenberg Traurig law firm, who represents the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court in my Fed RICO, acting in conflict as Greenberg Traurig was also former Patent Counsel for my companies and myself, where Greenberg has recently been alleged running a large Ponzi scheme in Florida, more information below. A link too many of the Florida specific crimes can be found at
http://iviewit.tv/supreme%20court/index.htm
and
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/oneofthesedays/index.htm
Complaints filed in Florida with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court are requested to be re-opened by your offices with oversight by your offices to mitigate any further conflicts of interest and violations of Public Offices and law.
Complaints filed with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court against, Florida Bar employees, Florida Supreme Court Public Officials, Proskauer Partners Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq. who was convicted of Felony DUI with Injury in Florida and Matthew Triggs who violated Florida Bar Rules in handling Complaints in multiple conflicts and violation of public office of the Florida Bar, are also being requested herein to have formal investigations into the matters reheard entirely based on a plethora of new information and evidence against the defendants in those matters and again instituted with oversight of your offices.
Similarly, we are requesting that your offices investigate the Florida Civil Court Case Civil Case No. 502001CA004671XXCDAB with new evidence showing a complete fraud on the court was orchestrated by Proskauer and Judge Jorge Labarga of the Florida Supreme Court, prior to your appointment of Labarga to the Florida Supreme Court.
I also note that members of your inner staff are formerly with Defendant Foley & Lardner, who acted as Solicitor General to the Florida Supreme Court while my complaints were being reviewed by that Court.
I also note that Justice Jorge Labarga and several of the Florida Supreme Court Justice and Court Officials are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit. I also note that several members or former members of the Florida Bar are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit.
Therefore, I request further that your offices in handling these matters proceed with extreme caution in ferreting out ALL Conflicts of Interest prior to involvement by any party, to preclude further possible charges against members of your office or any other party your offices join into these matters.
I have attached a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for all parties, including yourself, to sign and return to my office at 2753 NW 34th St. Boca Raton, FL 33434, prior to ANY Actions you take in even considering the matter.
As a mass of Conflicts of Interest have been discovered in these matters already and the Whistleblower further identifying a criminal conspiracy within state agencies, this Conflict form is essential to ensuring fair and impartial due process of law by non conflicted parties. Any conflicts identified may be considered based on full disclosure and agreement by ALL parties involved or new non conflicted parties must be retained prior to disclosure of even the most basic information.
As these matters in New York and Florida are against some of the highest ranking officials in the states, I know that in New York Anderson and now other related cases and witnesses who testified to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee are seeking various forms of witness protection, I similarly would like to know what options for this type of protection are available to those who come forward in Florida.
As a car bombing victim of the RICO Criminal Enterprise, described in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit I feel that certain protections should already have been availed, in fact, I petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for such once already and this Motion is located at the URL
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004_10_07_Supreme_Court_Florida_Motion_Final_Cert_Signed.pdf
as well as, repeated requests since it was determined by Florida Fire Investigator Rick Lee that accelerants’ were the cause of the explosion that blew up three cars next to it, in Boynton Beach Florida. Despite repeated notice to Florida Law Enforcement, as you can see from the previous link they too were involved in the second act that protection from the court was requested for and therefore have never investigated these matters through public office corruption after public office corruption after public office corruption as defined herein and in the attached URL’s.
Please make all exhibits and links fully incorporated by reference herein into this letter for formal docketing in the Florida Grand Jury Request of Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Companies, each URL may have several URL’s, also hereby incorporated entirely by reference herein and for further use by the Grand Jury.
As Whistleblower Anderson in a sworn statement has claimed that she witnessed document destruction of investigatory files first hand (Anderson’s Statement to the New York Judiciary Committee attached below), please print each and every url in entirety for inclusion into this document and due to the fact that these matters pertain to US Patent Rights of an inventor, please retain these files and information for a period of no less than 20 yrs.
There are over a thousand documents at the URL http://www.iviewit.tv/ on the homepage under the Evidence Section on the homepage for your review and for docketing with the complaints and for review by investigators or Grand Jurors.
Despite whether the Florida Grand Jury investigates these most serious allegations of corruption at the highest levels of Florida Government, let this letter also serve as a formal request that your offices begin all necessary notices and/or investigations and notify all investigatory bodies necessary to investigate all those persons named in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit from Florida and notify them of the new evidence and requests for an entire review of all prior actions by any Florida Agency listed herein or in the URL’s embedded herein.
Please formally notify the following offices of this submission, including but not limited to, the Florida Inspector General (copied herein), the Florida US Attorney, the necessary Florida District Attorneys and the Florida Attorney General of the allegations and information contained herein, please have all parties sign prior to acceptance of ANY materials a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, again prior to ANY actions or decisions being rendered or transfer of any confidential information.
Please take this communication as both a request to join the 19th Florida Grand Jury and Request for Formal Investigations of all of the following Florida Defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST by the Florida Governor and Florida Attorney General’s offices, please docket a separate complaint for each Florida organization and individual listed below;
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual
capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and
individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer,
ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional
and individual capacities,AMENDED
DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his COMPLAINT
professional and individual capacities,
GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
DAVID GEORGE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GREGG REED, in his professional
and individual capacities,
LEON GOLD, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STUART KAPP, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRIS WOLF, in his professional
and individual capacities,
JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional
and individual capacities,
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STATE OF FLORIDA,
OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR FLORIDA,
HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities,
THE FLORIDA BAR,
JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON in her official
and individual capacities,
LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her
official and individual capacities,
ERIC TURNER in his official and individual
capacities,
KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual
capacities,
JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual
capacities,
JERALD BEER in his official and individual
capacities,BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,
HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and
individual capacities
HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and
individual capacities,
THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual
capacities,
DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and
individual capacities,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA,
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.
BOCA RATON Police Department
ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and
individual capacities,
ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual
capacities,
CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC.,
ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP,
STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional
and individual capacities,
ERIC CHEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
AVI HERSH, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional
and individual capacities,
BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC.,
ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional
and individual capacities,
HOUSTON & SHAHADY, P.A., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities,
SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities,
KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,
ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, "
******
Above Letter From Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Technologies Founder and Main Inventor to Florida's Governor Charlie Crist ... AGAIN... What will Governor Charlie Crist of Florida do with this Knowing of Blatant and Widespread Corruption This Time ??
I will Let You Know.
In My Opinion, if Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum and if Governor Charlie Crist IGNORES this information, Well Time for a RICO Lawsuit, a Whistleblower Lawsuit AGAINST the STATE of FLORIDA for aiding and abetting Massive Shareholder Fraud, Major Crime and Corruption, Government Corruption and for Hiding Secrets that will Cost Taxpayers - Investors - Shareholders BILLIONS of Dollars.
More on the Massive Corruption in Florida
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
got a Tip on Corruption in Florida,
or on Bill McCollum Florida Attorney General,
Or On Governor Charlie Crist ??
eMail me
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
" Friday, September 03, 2010
Hon. Governor Charlie Crist
Office of Governor Charlie Crist
State of Florida
Dear Honorable Governor Charlie Crist,
Per the Attorney General of the Great State of Florida, I write to you for inclusion into the ongoing Nineteenth Statewide Grand Jury, the Eliot Bernstein and Iviewit companies claims of criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities by certain members of the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar, the Boca Raton P.D., the law firms Proskauer Rose LLP, Foley & Lardner LLP and more.
The extent of these claims of Public Office Corruption reach the highest levels of Florida government and thus are germane to the Grand Jury’s request for information and stated purpose, “The Office of Statewide Prosecution has established a public corruption hotline for anyone who believes they have information concerning a criminal offense involving public corruption or wishes to suggest issues the Statewide Grand Jury should investigate regarding public corruption.
Below is a communication from Attorney General McCollum in response to my request to his offices for inclusion, whereby he urges me to contact and join your offices of these most serious allegations as well.
I am contacting your offices again, as I have contacted them in the past regarding these matters and am asking that your offices take all actions necessary to have these allegations investigated by the Florida Grand Jury your office has convened, as well as, any other criminal actions you may deem appropriate in investigating these matters and notifying the proper authorities of the allegations alleged herein and in the URL links provided herein.
I am happy to provide additional information or testimony relating to the matters to any investigators you deem appropriate or before the Grand Jury.
Many of these matters have crossed state lines through the law firms accused and in New York, a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq. has identified a Racketeering type organization within not only the NY Courts and NY Disciplinary Agencies but the NY prosecutorial offices, including the US Attorney, the NY Attorney General Cuomo’s offices and the NY District Attorneys Office.
The allegations rise to senior members of these public offices acting in conspiracy to deprive due process to citizens’ complaints against them and in fact, a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein of the NY Supreme Court was allegedly according to Anderson Whitewashing attorney complaints for these prosecutors. In addition, Anderson claims “favored lawyers and law firms” had their complaints cleaned as well.
The Anderson case now also involves Federal Obstruction of Justice in a federal Lawsuit, with death threats on Federal Witnesses on their way to testify in Federal Court. Extortion of state employees is also evidenced in Anderson, replete with physical assaults on the 60 yr. female Anderson, to either aid and abet or else by Senior New York Supreme Court Officials.
My Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit filed alongside and in support of Anderson’s Historic and Heroic Whistleblower claims, was legally “related” to the Anderson Whistleblower lawsuit by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin.
Many of the defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST are located here in Florida, in fact all of my claims began in Florida, as that is where my companies and myself were located at the time the criminal activities were first discovered.
Proskauer partners were ordered for Investigation for Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public office by the New York Supreme Court, in a unanimous consent of five justices of that court but those investigations are now under investigation for their failure to investigate.
The allegations in NY are almost identical to those I filed in Florida just different players from the same firms often having infiltrated and violated public offices to deny due process to my complaints in violation of law and attorney and judicial conduct codes.
All of my complaints in Florida in the courts and to all state agencies are herein officially requested to be re-opened in light of the revelations of new and damning information revealed in Anderson and new evidence against certain defendants in my lawsuit from Florida.
New evidence includes Defendant Proskauer Rose LLP and Partner Thomas Sjoblom’s involvement in the ExSir Robert Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme, Sjoblom found aiding and abetting Stanford Employees in a Miami Airport Hanger teaching them how to lie to SEC and FBI investigators.
As you know, Proskauer has been sued in a Global Class Action for the entire damages of Stanford, approximately 7 Billion US Dollars. Another thread to Florida is another Defendant in my Fed RICO, now infamous Ponzi schemer, Marc S. Dreier, Esq., who has been sentenced to 20 years for his Ponzi scheme.
Greenberg Traurig law firm, who represents the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court in my Fed RICO, acting in conflict as Greenberg Traurig was also former Patent Counsel for my companies and myself, where Greenberg has recently been alleged running a large Ponzi scheme in Florida, more information below. A link too many of the Florida specific crimes can be found at
http://iviewit.tv/supreme%20court/index.htm
and
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/oneofthesedays/index.htm
Complaints filed in Florida with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court are requested to be re-opened by your offices with oversight by your offices to mitigate any further conflicts of interest and violations of Public Offices and law.
Complaints filed with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court against, Florida Bar employees, Florida Supreme Court Public Officials, Proskauer Partners Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq. who was convicted of Felony DUI with Injury in Florida and Matthew Triggs who violated Florida Bar Rules in handling Complaints in multiple conflicts and violation of public office of the Florida Bar, are also being requested herein to have formal investigations into the matters reheard entirely based on a plethora of new information and evidence against the defendants in those matters and again instituted with oversight of your offices.
Similarly, we are requesting that your offices investigate the Florida Civil Court Case Civil Case No. 502001CA004671XXCDAB with new evidence showing a complete fraud on the court was orchestrated by Proskauer and Judge Jorge Labarga of the Florida Supreme Court, prior to your appointment of Labarga to the Florida Supreme Court.
I also note that members of your inner staff are formerly with Defendant Foley & Lardner, who acted as Solicitor General to the Florida Supreme Court while my complaints were being reviewed by that Court.
I also note that Justice Jorge Labarga and several of the Florida Supreme Court Justice and Court Officials are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit. I also note that several members or former members of the Florida Bar are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit.
Therefore, I request further that your offices in handling these matters proceed with extreme caution in ferreting out ALL Conflicts of Interest prior to involvement by any party, to preclude further possible charges against members of your office or any other party your offices join into these matters.
I have attached a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for all parties, including yourself, to sign and return to my office at 2753 NW 34th St. Boca Raton, FL 33434, prior to ANY Actions you take in even considering the matter.
As a mass of Conflicts of Interest have been discovered in these matters already and the Whistleblower further identifying a criminal conspiracy within state agencies, this Conflict form is essential to ensuring fair and impartial due process of law by non conflicted parties. Any conflicts identified may be considered based on full disclosure and agreement by ALL parties involved or new non conflicted parties must be retained prior to disclosure of even the most basic information.
As these matters in New York and Florida are against some of the highest ranking officials in the states, I know that in New York Anderson and now other related cases and witnesses who testified to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee are seeking various forms of witness protection, I similarly would like to know what options for this type of protection are available to those who come forward in Florida.
As a car bombing victim of the RICO Criminal Enterprise, described in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit I feel that certain protections should already have been availed, in fact, I petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for such once already and this Motion is located at the URL
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004_10_07_Supreme_Court_Florida_Motion_Final_Cert_Signed.pdf
as well as, repeated requests since it was determined by Florida Fire Investigator Rick Lee that accelerants’ were the cause of the explosion that blew up three cars next to it, in Boynton Beach Florida. Despite repeated notice to Florida Law Enforcement, as you can see from the previous link they too were involved in the second act that protection from the court was requested for and therefore have never investigated these matters through public office corruption after public office corruption after public office corruption as defined herein and in the attached URL’s.
Please make all exhibits and links fully incorporated by reference herein into this letter for formal docketing in the Florida Grand Jury Request of Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Companies, each URL may have several URL’s, also hereby incorporated entirely by reference herein and for further use by the Grand Jury.
As Whistleblower Anderson in a sworn statement has claimed that she witnessed document destruction of investigatory files first hand (Anderson’s Statement to the New York Judiciary Committee attached below), please print each and every url in entirety for inclusion into this document and due to the fact that these matters pertain to US Patent Rights of an inventor, please retain these files and information for a period of no less than 20 yrs.
There are over a thousand documents at the URL http://www.iviewit.tv/ on the homepage under the Evidence Section on the homepage for your review and for docketing with the complaints and for review by investigators or Grand Jurors.
Despite whether the Florida Grand Jury investigates these most serious allegations of corruption at the highest levels of Florida Government, let this letter also serve as a formal request that your offices begin all necessary notices and/or investigations and notify all investigatory bodies necessary to investigate all those persons named in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit from Florida and notify them of the new evidence and requests for an entire review of all prior actions by any Florida Agency listed herein or in the URL’s embedded herein.
Please formally notify the following offices of this submission, including but not limited to, the Florida Inspector General (copied herein), the Florida US Attorney, the necessary Florida District Attorneys and the Florida Attorney General of the allegations and information contained herein, please have all parties sign prior to acceptance of ANY materials a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, again prior to ANY actions or decisions being rendered or transfer of any confidential information.
Please take this communication as both a request to join the 19th Florida Grand Jury and Request for Formal Investigations of all of the following Florida Defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST by the Florida Governor and Florida Attorney General’s offices, please docket a separate complaint for each Florida organization and individual listed below;
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual
capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and
individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer,
ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional
and individual capacities,AMENDED
DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his COMPLAINT
professional and individual capacities,
GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
DAVID GEORGE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GREGG REED, in his professional
and individual capacities,
LEON GOLD, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STUART KAPP, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRIS WOLF, in his professional
and individual capacities,
JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional
and individual capacities,
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STATE OF FLORIDA,
OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR FLORIDA,
HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities,
THE FLORIDA BAR,
JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON in her official
and individual capacities,
LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her
official and individual capacities,
ERIC TURNER in his official and individual
capacities,
KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual
capacities,
JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual
capacities,
JERALD BEER in his official and individual
capacities,BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,
HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and
individual capacities
HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and
individual capacities,
THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual
capacities,
DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and
individual capacities,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA,
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.
BOCA RATON Police Department
ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and
individual capacities,
ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual
capacities,
CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC.,
ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP,
STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional
and individual capacities,
ERIC CHEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
AVI HERSH, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional
and individual capacities,
BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC.,
ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional
and individual capacities,
HOUSTON & SHAHADY, P.A., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities,
SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities,
KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,
ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, "
******
Above Letter From Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Technologies Founder and Main Inventor to Florida's Governor Charlie Crist ... AGAIN... What will Governor Charlie Crist of Florida do with this Knowing of Blatant and Widespread Corruption This Time ??
I will Let You Know.
In My Opinion, if Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum and if Governor Charlie Crist IGNORES this information, Well Time for a RICO Lawsuit, a Whistleblower Lawsuit AGAINST the STATE of FLORIDA for aiding and abetting Massive Shareholder Fraud, Major Crime and Corruption, Government Corruption and for Hiding Secrets that will Cost Taxpayers - Investors - Shareholders BILLIONS of Dollars.
More on the Massive Corruption in Florida
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
got a Tip on Corruption in Florida,
or on Bill McCollum Florida Attorney General,
Or On Governor Charlie Crist ??
eMail me
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Thursday, September 2, 2010
So What Does Bill McCollum Florida Attorney General have to Say About Blatant and Rampant Florida Corruption?
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum Notified
of Rampant, Blatant Corruption in the Florida Courts.
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum CANNOT say that he does not know.
So Does Florida Attorney General Bill MCollum stand with the PROVEN victims of Massive Florida Corruption or Does Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum stand with the Criminals, Attorneys, Judges, Supreme Court, and others Conspiring in the Corruption in Florida.
There is Radio shows to Disbar the Florida Bar, there is Complaints Constantly.
How Long Can this go on ? The Following is Notification to the Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum on Just How bad the Corruption in the State of Florida REALLY Is.
" Dear Honorable Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, I have received your response regarding my submission and appreciate your interest in the matter.
Due to the number of conflicts already existing in these matters and with members of this Committee Defendants in my ongoing Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit in New York that has been Legally related to a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Lawsuit exposing a mass of conflicts in public offices and Title 18 Obstruction.
I hereby request that all members of this Grand Jury Committee, including your offices, provide a formal signed and Verified Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, in advance of handling ANY of the materials submitted, forming any opinions, dismissing the matters or any other action that may affect the outcome of these matters before the Committee.
I am providing herein a Conflict of Interest Disclosure form, please print, sign, and return for all individuals who handle this most confidential information in any way, again prior to any actions involving these matters.
If you would like to discuss the Conflict of Interest Disclosure, please feel free to contact me.
Full Document Below. It is Interactive You Can Make it Bigger.
you can Download it.. Bill McCollum, Florida Attorney General
is WELL aware of Florida Corruption.
Florida Corruption Exposed
Say No to Florida Corruption
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology and
the Involvement of Florida Corrupt Courts
www.Iviewit.TV
www.JorgeLabarga.com
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.ChristopherCWheeler.com
of Rampant, Blatant Corruption in the Florida Courts.
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum CANNOT say that he does not know.
So Does Florida Attorney General Bill MCollum stand with the PROVEN victims of Massive Florida Corruption or Does Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum stand with the Criminals, Attorneys, Judges, Supreme Court, and others Conspiring in the Corruption in Florida.
There is Radio shows to Disbar the Florida Bar, there is Complaints Constantly.
How Long Can this go on ? The Following is Notification to the Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum on Just How bad the Corruption in the State of Florida REALLY Is.
" Dear Honorable Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, I have received your response regarding my submission and appreciate your interest in the matter.
Due to the number of conflicts already existing in these matters and with members of this Committee Defendants in my ongoing Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit in New York that has been Legally related to a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Lawsuit exposing a mass of conflicts in public offices and Title 18 Obstruction.
I hereby request that all members of this Grand Jury Committee, including your offices, provide a formal signed and Verified Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, in advance of handling ANY of the materials submitted, forming any opinions, dismissing the matters or any other action that may affect the outcome of these matters before the Committee.
I am providing herein a Conflict of Interest Disclosure form, please print, sign, and return for all individuals who handle this most confidential information in any way, again prior to any actions involving these matters.
If you would like to discuss the Conflict of Interest Disclosure, please feel free to contact me.
Full Document Below. It is Interactive You Can Make it Bigger.
you can Download it.. Bill McCollum, Florida Attorney General
is WELL aware of Florida Corruption.
Florida Corruption Exposed
Say No to Florida Corruption
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology and
the Involvement of Florida Corrupt Courts
www.Iviewit.TV
www.JorgeLabarga.com
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.ChristopherCWheeler.com
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Warner Bros. Signed Non Disclosure Agreements with Iviewit, Warner Violated those Agreements. Warner Signed License and Service Agreements..
Is the SEC Listening, LOOKING... do they even Care.. or will Mary Schapiro and the SEC just sit and wait for a Multi-Billion to Trillion Dollar Scandal and they say Whoops.. We had NO WAY to Know.. and then Of Course Investigative Blogger, Crystal L. Cox will have to Say What a Crock That is - Because does ANYONE at the SEC know How To work GOOGLE... ??? or any Search Engine Really.. or Possibly READ Complaints... ???
Warner Bros. - has broke the Law and in the process put shareholders at HUGE risk, why is Jeffrey Bewkes ignoring this blatant proof of Fraud.
Warner Bros signed multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements and Warner Bros. Signed License and Service Agreements with the Iviewit Company. 9 years have passed and Warner Bros. Blatantly and Illegally Violated those agreements long ago, why?
And Now Eliot Bernstein Founder and one of the Inventors it the Iviewit Stolen Patent has filed a very informative, incredibly detailed SEC Complaint. One that for Now Mary Schapiro and the SEC seems to be ignoring... I am not sure why just yet.. but hope to get tips on this soon...
Some of the Warner Bros' Iviewit Timeline and more details
of the Warner Bros. Relationship with the Iviewit Company.
" " TIMELINE OF WARNER BROS ET AL. RELATIONSHIP WITH IVIEWIT
The following Timelines are presented to give a factual timeline to the allegations herein, the exhibits are linked online and all Uniform Resource Locators (“URL”) and Exhibited Links throughout this document are hereby incorporated, in entirety by reference herein, including over 1000 evidentiary links on the homepage at www.iviewit.tv with exhibits that contain thousands of pages of factual evidence[5].
The timeline will also reveal facts regarding the relationships between many of the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Warner Bros et al., including relations to the main perpetrator of the alleged crimes, the law firm Proskauer Rose.
*Note Warner Bros et al. relevant mergers, acquisitions and breakups to these matters in the timeline below are in bold italics.
1998-2002
Relevant Communications Between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al.
· 1998-2001
Inventions in Imaging and Video Discovered and Intellectual Property Filings begin in 1998. Proskauer Rose was retained Intellectual Property counsel for Iviewit for filing of Intellectual Properties.
· 2000-2002
Warner Bros et al. signs multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.
Non-Disclosure Agreements @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf
Pages 1-5, 10, 61-62, 80, 108-109, 234
· November 02, 2000 ~ Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf
· January 11, 2001 ~ America Online and Time Warner Complete Merger to Create AOL Time Warner
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,668364,00.html
· February 08, 2001 ~ Letter from David J. Colter (“Colter”) ~ Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Founder of AOL, Ted Leonsis (“Leonsis”), regarding the efficacy of the Iviewit technologies.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010208%20Colter%20to%20Leonsis%20Warner%20Bros%20AOL.pdf
· February 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - Signed Warner Bros. License And Service Agreement @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.
Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein ’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.
Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al.
Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective. Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors.
The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
· April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL. AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
· May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.
I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. ""
Source of Post and of Warner Bros SEC Complaint
So Where is Mary Schapiro on this One ?
jeffrey bewkes
Warner Bros. - has broke the Law and in the process put shareholders at HUGE risk, why is Jeffrey Bewkes ignoring this blatant proof of Fraud.
Warner Bros signed multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements and Warner Bros. Signed License and Service Agreements with the Iviewit Company. 9 years have passed and Warner Bros. Blatantly and Illegally Violated those agreements long ago, why?
And Now Eliot Bernstein Founder and one of the Inventors it the Iviewit Stolen Patent has filed a very informative, incredibly detailed SEC Complaint. One that for Now Mary Schapiro and the SEC seems to be ignoring... I am not sure why just yet.. but hope to get tips on this soon...
Some of the Warner Bros' Iviewit Timeline and more details
of the Warner Bros. Relationship with the Iviewit Company.
" " TIMELINE OF WARNER BROS ET AL. RELATIONSHIP WITH IVIEWIT
The following Timelines are presented to give a factual timeline to the allegations herein, the exhibits are linked online and all Uniform Resource Locators (“URL”) and Exhibited Links throughout this document are hereby incorporated, in entirety by reference herein, including over 1000 evidentiary links on the homepage at www.iviewit.tv with exhibits that contain thousands of pages of factual evidence[5].
The timeline will also reveal facts regarding the relationships between many of the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Warner Bros et al., including relations to the main perpetrator of the alleged crimes, the law firm Proskauer Rose.
*Note Warner Bros et al. relevant mergers, acquisitions and breakups to these matters in the timeline below are in bold italics.
1998-2002
Relevant Communications Between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al.
· 1998-2001
Inventions in Imaging and Video Discovered and Intellectual Property Filings begin in 1998. Proskauer Rose was retained Intellectual Property counsel for Iviewit for filing of Intellectual Properties.
· 2000-2002
Warner Bros et al. signs multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.
Non-Disclosure Agreements @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf
Pages 1-5, 10, 61-62, 80, 108-109, 234
· November 02, 2000 ~ Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf
· January 11, 2001 ~ America Online and Time Warner Complete Merger to Create AOL Time Warner
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,668364,00.html
· February 08, 2001 ~ Letter from David J. Colter (“Colter”) ~ Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Founder of AOL, Ted Leonsis (“Leonsis”), regarding the efficacy of the Iviewit technologies.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010208%20Colter%20to%20Leonsis%20Warner%20Bros%20AOL.pdf
· February 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - Signed Warner Bros. License And Service Agreement @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.
Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein ’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.
Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al.
Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective. Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors.
The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
· April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL. AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
· May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.
I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. ""
Source of Post and of Warner Bros SEC Complaint
So Where is Mary Schapiro on this One ?
jeffrey bewkes
Friday, February 5, 2010
P. Stephen Lamont - Friend or Foe of the Iviewit Shareholders?
Is P. Stephen Lamont working for or Against the Iviewit Shareholders and the best interest of the Iviewit Inventors?
******
Below is an excerpt from an SEC letter to be filed shortly regarding information regarding the fraudulent actions of P. Stephen Lamont in his continued representation of Iviewit, as CEO no less, at an address where no Iviewit company has ever been incorporated or listed with any agency.
P. Stephen Lamont was fired long ago and has no right to act in any capacity for Iviewit or Iviewit Shareholders.
P. Stephen Lamont also has been reported to the courts for his criminal activities in representing shareholders in my Federal RICO and Antitrust case when he is not a licensed attorney and never has passed the bar.
You will find other information below regarding the illegal activities of P. Stephen Lamont and he has been reported to State and Federal agencies regarding these crimes.
I advise anyone considering dealing with P. Stephen Lamont in any capacity to check with your legal counsel about the possible ramifications you may incur regarding any issues with Iviewit and Lamont. These latest assaults on my character etc. appear to be feeble attempts by a desperate man whose cover and misdeeds have been exposed.
P. Stephen Lamont also references filings with the US Second Circuit whereby his separate appeal has been dismissed but fails to mention that in my appeal he also was identified for illegally representing Iviewit Shareholders when he is not an attorney.
• FEBRUARY 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - SIGNED WARNER BROS. LICENSE AND SERVICE AGREEMENT @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
• August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more. Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees. Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[1].
At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros. et al.
o Whereby former Acting CEO of Iviewit P. Stephen Lamont, ( a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis ) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the agreement is attempted to be wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, perhaps because they were denying its existence.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors. The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
• April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL.
AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment.
Chey formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony ( also under Signed Agreements ) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION
of Sony’s involvement in these matters.
Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros. et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors. I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC can take this Formal Complaint additionally
as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY.
• December 20, 2001 ~ P. Stephen Lamont's letter to Kenneth Rubenstein regarding Smith and Rubenstein and the refusal of Rubenstein to RE-OPINE to Smith due to what he claims is a “CONFLICT”, which led further to the breakdown of relations between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al. Lamont later affirmed to Shareholders in a written communication that Microsoft had planted him in the Iviewit companies.
Later P. Stephen Lamont changed that story to AOL and Leonsis’ niece had planted him in Iviewit through AOL Founder Leonsis’ best friend Chuck Brunelas (“Brunelas”). Brunelas recruited under contract Lamont to the Iviewit companies on behalf of Leonsis. Lamont’s revelations of being planted at the company which came after he was hired led to the termination of Lamont at that time[2].
December 20, 2001 P. Stephen Lamont Letters to Kenneth Rubenstein ~
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020611%20System%20and%20Method%20for%20Fraud%20on%20USPTO.pdf
Pages 455-462
o November 09, 2001 ~ Brunelas Employment Agreement
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011109%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20Agreement%20re%20Warner%20Bros%20AOLTW.pdf
o Based on new information since that time, it is alleged that Rubenstein, Lamont, Leonsis and Smith operated together to sabotage Iviewit/Warner Bros. et al. relations and others, purposefully to breach the prior signed licensing agreements and avoid paying the royalties owed to the Iviewit companies, using the old “good guy / bad guy” routine.
The SEC should note here that Hall and I recently reported Lamont to Federal and State authorities for alleged collusion in the RICO activities claimed in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, including ongoing criminal activities[3].
Further, Lamont continues to represent himself and Iviewit Shareholders as the Iviewit CEO, when he is fully aware of his termination from employment and that he has no authorization from the Board of Directors, Management or Shareholders to represent their security interests in Iviewit companies, this securities fraud also should be subject for investigation by the SEC.
• P. Stephen Lamont claims to be CEO of Iviewit Technologies, Inc. in multiple correspondences and Federal court papers with an address at 175 King Street. Armonk, N.Y. 10504 and whereby no Iviewit offices were ever opened or authorized at this address. The office is directly across the street from Defendant in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit IBM’s world headquarters.
o Additional Evidence for the SEC regarding P. Stephen Lamont is contained in a June 18, 2009 Letter to New York Attorney General Chief of Staff, Steven M. Cohen regarding fraudulent activities of Lamont @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090618%20FINAL%20NYAG%20Steven%20Cohen%20Letter%20Re%20Lamont%20Signed.pdf
o The SEC should note here that Lamont’s initial resume submitted by Iviewit contracted employment recruiter, Brunelas, is materially different and contradicts what Lamont himself recently claims regarding his past on the Iviewit Homepage, in multiple court filings and other letters to Iviewit shareholders.
• Original 2001 Resume Submitted to Iviewit on P. Stephen Lamont by Brunelas @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Lamont%20Resume%20Given%20to%20Iviewit%20by%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• 2001 Resume Claims the following:
Columbia University School of Law ~ J. D. in Commercial and Regulatory Law - May 1992
Columbia University Graduate School of Business ~ M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting - May 1981
State University of New York at Cortland ~ B.A. in Economics - June 1978
• 2009 Iviewit Homepage Statement written by P. Stephen Lamont claims:
“By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit.
With more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering” Source www.iviewit.tv homepage.
• Whereby Lamont’s legal and other degrees claimed are wholly different and therefore false in one or both of his background accounts as they are materially different, again causation for further investigation of Lamont by the SEC and other investigators this letter has been copied or addressed to.
• Further, you will note that Lamont refers to himself as “former Acting CEO of Iviewit” and claims counsel advised him to resign any official role due to the potential for charges of fraud, and I advised Lamont to follow counsels’ advice and personally, I did not accept any official roles on counsels’ advice.
Yet, even in recent court documents and other illegally signed documents executed by Lamont to major Blue Chip companies, including Microsoft, Lamont now represents himself as CEO of Iviewit inapposite of counsels’ advice, at an address that is not registered to any company Lamont claims to be employed as CEO by.
• August 05, 2009 Lamont Letter to Microsoft http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20090805%20Lamont%20Illegal%20Letter%20to%20Microsoft.pdf
• Lamont further now claims such executive role in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, claiming he is CEO of Iviewit, when no Board has ever put him in that position and when he is fully cognizant that he has no authority legally to represent Iviewit Shareholders. Lamont even attempts to represent Iviewit Shareholders and Companies currently in Federal Court, while not having ever passed the bar to practice law and therefore precluded from representing others in court. Again, cause for further investigation of Lamont.
• February 09, 2009 Lamont Court Filing
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090209%20Lamont%20Attempt%20to%20Quash%20Bernstein%20Motion.pdf
• The SEC should note here that while the document claims service on February 09, 2008, it appears executed February 09, 2009.
Whereby the SEC should also note that Lamont does not represent himself individually in the Lawsuit but acts on behalf of Iviewit Shareholders of which he has no authorization from Shareholders to act on their behalf and also is not a lawyer, making it ILLEGAL for him to act on others behalf in a legal capacity.
The District Court and Second Circuit Court notified of this ILLEGAL representation and asked by me to force amendment of the complaint, instead continue to allow the ILLEGAL representation of Lamont to continue. This ILLEGAL representation of Shareholders is also a serious criminal act.
• Finally, at the company Digital Factory that Lamont lists as one of his former employers, in his resume previously exhibited herein, one of the company employees later disclosed that Lamont had been in stock trouble for securities fraud with the board of that company, of course Lamont’s resume failed to disclose this material fact.
• December 31, 2001 – Letter from Brunelas to Greg B. Thagard (“Thagard”) ~ Vice President Advanced Technology Technical Operations at Warner Bros. The letter is regarding Thagard’s acceptance of an Iviewit Advisory Board Position. Later both Thagard and Colter would receive Iviewit Stock options for their Board roles with approval of Warner Bros. and Sony executives.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011231%20Brunelas%20to%20Thagard%20Regarding%20Joining%20Iviewit%20Advisory%20Board.pdf
• January 07, 2002 ~ Letters by Lamont regarding his meeting with Rubenstein regarding Warner Bros et al. Rubenstein was presented the exhibited document in draft form at his deposition, where he read it and then dodged questions regarding why his name is referenced in relation to opinions he gave to Warner Bros. et al. after denying he knew anything about Iviewit or the patents.
The letter wholly contradicts his prior denial of knowing of the Iviewit inventions or Eliot Bernstein, contradicting his sworn deposition statements and sworn letters to Judge Jorge Labarga constituting multiple instances of perjury and more.
January 07, 2002 and more P. Lamont letters to Kenneth Rubenstein
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2006%2003%20Iviewit%20Rebuttal%20to%20Wheeler%202nd%20Response_Final.pdf
Pages 19-23
o November 20, 2002 Kenneth Rubenstein Deposition and Deposition Exhibits
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Depositions%20BOOKMARKED%20SEARCHABLE%20with%20hyperlink%20comments.pdf
Pages 1-100, the exhibits attached to the deposition show Kenneth Rubenstein’s denials.
• January 14, 2002 Warner Bros. employee Colter’s internal Warner Bros. document containing an ADMISSION OF USE OF IVIEWIT PROPRIETARY PROCESSES AND VIOLATION OF NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS by many Warner Bros. et al. employees. The letter also provides affirmation that Rubenstein ( MPEGLA LLC Patent Counsel, former Iviewit Proskauer Rose Patent Counsel and Warner Bros. counsel ) opined favorably to Warner Bros. The document again directly refutes Rubenstein’s statements in deposition and written communications to the Labarga court that he did not opine or even know of the Iviewit inventions.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
• February 17, 2002 – Eliot Bernstein letter to Brunelas Regarding Smith’s sudden request to have Rubenstein of Proskauer speak to him to re-opine on his former statements, already exhibited herein, regarding the efficacy and novelty of the patents.
Kenneth Rubenstein was acting Patent Counsel to Iviewit as indicated in the exhibited Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer billed to author and distribute to Iviewit potential investors when he opined to Warner Bros.
The links below provide information on Kenneth Rubenstein’s position as an Iviewit Board member and Iviewit Patent Counsel despite his statements to the contrary.
At the time Smith requested to speak with Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein already were terminated by Iviewit and investigations were already underway regarding the patent thefts and more.
o February 17, 2002 Letter from Eliot Bernstein to Brunelas.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020117%20Bernstein%20letter%20to%20Brunelas%20Regarding%20Smith%20response%20to%20Colter%20to%20talk%20with%20Rubenstein%20Poskauer.pdf
o January 2001 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, whereby the SEC should note here that Kenneth Rubenstein is listed both as Iviewit Patent Counsel and an Iviewit Advisory Board member.
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Wachovia%20Private%20Placement%20Memorandum%20Bookmarked.pdf
Page 4 – “Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio - Mr. Rubenstein is the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Page 16 - “Strong and Experienced Board of Directors and Advisory Board.” iviewit's Board of Directors and Advisors consist of several well-established individuals from the technology, entertainment, and financial community.
Directors have extensive backgrounds with top-tier firms such as Goldman Sachs, Kidder Peabody, and McKinsey & Co. Crossbow Ventures has provided $3.0 million in funding and sits on the Board.
Technology and entertainment guidance comes from a partner at Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway & Wertheimer and from Kenneth Rubenstein, the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Additionally on Page 16 - “The Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio. The Company's strategy is to establish market precedence through licensing of trade secrets and know-how.
Page 38 – ADVISORY BOARD SECTION
“Kenneth Rubenstein Partner, Proskauer Rose LLP. Mr. Rubenstein is a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP law firm and is the patent attorney for iviewit. He is a registered patent attorney before the US. Patent & Trademark Office.
Mr. Rubenstein counsels his clients with respect to the validity and infringement of competitors' patents, as well as prosecutes patent applications. For the past several years he has worked on the formation of a patent pool, for MPEG-2 technology, involving large consumer electronics and entertainment companies.
He is also a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. Mr. Rubenstein received his law degree, cum laude, from New York Law School and his Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he also graduated with a B.S. Degree.
The SEC should note here that Rubenstein’s attempt to claim he never heard of Iviewit, including at his deposition, allegedly is due to the massive conflicts of interest that Rubenstein had.
If Kenneth Rubenstein were patent counsel to Iviewit and simultaneously counsel to Warner Bros. et al. when he originally opined to Colter, without conflict waivers or disclosure, this obviously would have violated attorney conduct codes and law.
Additionally, Kenneth Rubenstein is conflicted with the patent pooling scheme and artifice to fraud inventors he has created, MPEGLA LLC, where again he acted as counsel and founder of MPEGLA LLC while also patent counsel to Iviewit.
The conflict here is again obvious where the Iviewit technologies were the single greatest threat to his pools as Iviewit has the dominant technology, which without, the MPEG license would be worthless.
The SEC should note that Rubenstein initially misrepresented himself and Joao as Proskauer Partners to Iviewit, when prior to learning of my inventions they were both with Meltzer.
Kenneth Rubenstein is counsel and sole patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC now one of the largest infringers of the Iviewit technologies, licensing Warner Bros et al.
Proskauer, after learning of my technologies value, estimated at a trillion dollars to “priceless” by leading engineers at Real 3D, Inc. and without a patent department at the time in 1998, then rushed to acquire Rubenstein and his Meltzer patent group and the MPEGLA LLC pools.
When the acquisition was complete, Proskauer, my former patent counsel, directly began inuring benefits from the stolen technologies via their new client MPEGLA LLC in their new Intellectual Property department created after learning of my inventions.
MPEGLA has now tied and bundled my inventions to their pools licensing schemes, converting the royalties from the technologies from Iviewit and through other anticompetitive tactics have kept Iviewit from market in classic RICO and Antitrust violations, including violations of Sherman and Clayton, as further defined in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit exhibited already herein.
The SEC should note here that Warner Bros. et al. and many of those involved directly in these matters are also involved in DVD patent pooling schemes, including but not limited to, DVD6C Patent Pool[4].
Whereby, similar to MPEGLA LLC’s illegal use of my technologies, DVD6C has similarly tied and bundled my technologies to their pools licenses, excluding me from royalties and then inuring royalties from others from my technologies directly from their membership in the pool.
o The SEC should note that the only Meltzer Intellectual Property attorney not to transfer to Proskauer at the time of acquisition was a one Raymond Joao, who initially with Rubenstein was represented as a Proskauer partner and who took initial patent disclosures with Rubenstein.
In 1999-2000 it was learned that Raymond Joao was putting patents into his own name while sabotaging the Iviewit patents. Upon leaving Iviewit, Joao claimed publically that he had 90+ patents in his name and then went to work for Marc S. Dreier, recently prosecuted and convicted by the SEC for an alleged Ponzi scheme, as further evidenced later herein.
February 08, 2002 – Lamont letter to John D. Calkins (“Calkins”) ~ Senior Vice President New Media Business Development of Warner Bros., regarding stock issued to Warner Bros. employees Colter and Thagard for Advisory Board roles they accepted and also regarding their about face and breach of contracts.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020208%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Re%20Colter%20and%20Thagard%20Advisory%20Board%20Stock.pdf
• February 20, 2002 – Calkins Letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
The SEC should note that opposite of Warner Bros. claim in the letter that Iviewit is creating a false record, it is instead Warner Bros. that attempts to create a false and misleading record of fact in the letter.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020220%20Calkins%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Warner%20Bros%20Wayne%20Smith.pdf
• February 27, 2002 – Lamont to Calkins about Warner Bros. Breach of Contracts, the SEC should note that while Lamont relies on the NDA, the February 15, 2001 SIGNED LICENSING AGREEMENT, illustrated above, also has strong language about IP rights concerning the Iviewit technologies that also are violated.
Also, take note, that at this time in 2002, Warner Bros. et al. knew of the breaches and formally was notified by Iviewit at that time of such breaches and therefore they should have begun accounting for the IP Liabilities at this time, if not earlier according to FASB accounting rules.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020227%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Breach%20more.pdf
• March 05, 2002 – Smith letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020305%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Calkins.pdf
• November 20, 2002 - April 15, 2002 Letter by Lamont to Rubenstein Regarding Conversations with Warner Bros et al. presented to Rubenstein at his November 20, 2002 Deposition as already discussed herein.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Kenneth%20Rubenstein%20Deposition%20with%20Exhibits%20CERT.pdf
pages 3-9
Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros. et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements.
Warner Bros. et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.
Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged criminal RICO activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros. et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of pouring in $25 Million Dollars in investment capital to my companies.
When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the filed patents and Calkins regarding corporate fraud.
At that time, Warner Bros et al. employees and personnel became aware of fraud relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional to what Andersen had found on or about that time and this information was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Smith and Calkins.
Colter relayed that Warner Bros. et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement.
A Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer circulated to potential Iviewit investors including Warner Bros. et al. These Securities Frauds contained in the Private Placement are also cause for further SEC investigation.
Per Colter, Warner Bros. et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer Rose, Foley and Larder and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.
Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues.
Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.
Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office which resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions.
Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP.
Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by their counsel Proskauer Rose.
Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer Rose LLP or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement.
It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer Rose were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer Rose LLP and had Stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations.
Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies.
The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office and others.
Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose law firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit.
Kenneth Rubenstein is under investigation with other attorneys by Moatz and was also ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of five justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety for violating public offices to block complaints I filed against him.
Where later, after discovery of the Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, it was learned that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros. was working with Kenneth Rubenstein ( Iviewit Patent Counsel, MPEGLA Counsel and Warner Bros. Counsel ) and that their relationship somehow now precluded Kenneth Rubenstein from re-opining on his prior opinion of the patents for Warner Bros. employees as already evidenced herein.
Whereby Warner Bros. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of those binding signed agreements.
The MPEGLA LLC patent pooling scheme created and overseen by Counsel Rubenstein is merely an artifice to defraud inventors and has illegally precluded me from market in classic antitrust activities, including death threats and a car bomb.
Whereby the DVD Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in have also used the technologies in violation of signed contracts and agreements, admittedly, yet since that time they too have excluded Iviewit from market, again in classic antitrust activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 year Massive Liabilities.
The SEC should note that while there is a long gap in time between these prior Iviewit and Warner Bros et al., communications and contracts and the current contact to notify them again of liabilities resulting from the IP infringement and the newer Lawsuit liabilities, that during the gap I was actively pursuing my rights.
I have given similar information to several investigators and courts over the several years in between communications regarding Warner Bros. et al. involvement in the Iviewit allegations in my Federal RICO Lawsuit.
During the time, I was also forced to flee my home several times for my family’s safety, including from death threats from Mr. Brian Utley on behalf of the law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner and then from actual Attempted Murder of my family. Attempted Murder through a Car Bombing of my family minivan in Del Ray Beach, FL., images of the Car Bombing can be found on the www.iviewit.tv [5] homepage.
Eliot Bernstein... Information to be found at http://www.iviewit.tv/
More Details on the Iviewit Case at www.Iviewit.TV
******
Below is an excerpt from an SEC letter to be filed shortly regarding information regarding the fraudulent actions of P. Stephen Lamont in his continued representation of Iviewit, as CEO no less, at an address where no Iviewit company has ever been incorporated or listed with any agency.
P. Stephen Lamont was fired long ago and has no right to act in any capacity for Iviewit or Iviewit Shareholders.
P. Stephen Lamont also has been reported to the courts for his criminal activities in representing shareholders in my Federal RICO and Antitrust case when he is not a licensed attorney and never has passed the bar.
You will find other information below regarding the illegal activities of P. Stephen Lamont and he has been reported to State and Federal agencies regarding these crimes.
I advise anyone considering dealing with P. Stephen Lamont in any capacity to check with your legal counsel about the possible ramifications you may incur regarding any issues with Iviewit and Lamont. These latest assaults on my character etc. appear to be feeble attempts by a desperate man whose cover and misdeeds have been exposed.
P. Stephen Lamont also references filings with the US Second Circuit whereby his separate appeal has been dismissed but fails to mention that in my appeal he also was identified for illegally representing Iviewit Shareholders when he is not an attorney.
• FEBRUARY 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - SIGNED WARNER BROS. LICENSE AND SERVICE AGREEMENT @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
• August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more. Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees. Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[1].
At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros. et al.
o Whereby former Acting CEO of Iviewit P. Stephen Lamont, ( a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis ) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the agreement is attempted to be wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, perhaps because they were denying its existence.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors. The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
• April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL.
AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment.
Chey formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony ( also under Signed Agreements ) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION
of Sony’s involvement in these matters.
Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros. et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors. I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC can take this Formal Complaint additionally
as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY.
• December 20, 2001 ~ P. Stephen Lamont's letter to Kenneth Rubenstein regarding Smith and Rubenstein and the refusal of Rubenstein to RE-OPINE to Smith due to what he claims is a “CONFLICT”, which led further to the breakdown of relations between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al. Lamont later affirmed to Shareholders in a written communication that Microsoft had planted him in the Iviewit companies.
Later P. Stephen Lamont changed that story to AOL and Leonsis’ niece had planted him in Iviewit through AOL Founder Leonsis’ best friend Chuck Brunelas (“Brunelas”). Brunelas recruited under contract Lamont to the Iviewit companies on behalf of Leonsis. Lamont’s revelations of being planted at the company which came after he was hired led to the termination of Lamont at that time[2].
December 20, 2001 P. Stephen Lamont Letters to Kenneth Rubenstein ~
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020611%20System%20and%20Method%20for%20Fraud%20on%20USPTO.pdf
Pages 455-462
o November 09, 2001 ~ Brunelas Employment Agreement
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011109%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20Agreement%20re%20Warner%20Bros%20AOLTW.pdf
o Based on new information since that time, it is alleged that Rubenstein, Lamont, Leonsis and Smith operated together to sabotage Iviewit/Warner Bros. et al. relations and others, purposefully to breach the prior signed licensing agreements and avoid paying the royalties owed to the Iviewit companies, using the old “good guy / bad guy” routine.
The SEC should note here that Hall and I recently reported Lamont to Federal and State authorities for alleged collusion in the RICO activities claimed in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, including ongoing criminal activities[3].
Further, Lamont continues to represent himself and Iviewit Shareholders as the Iviewit CEO, when he is fully aware of his termination from employment and that he has no authorization from the Board of Directors, Management or Shareholders to represent their security interests in Iviewit companies, this securities fraud also should be subject for investigation by the SEC.
• P. Stephen Lamont claims to be CEO of Iviewit Technologies, Inc. in multiple correspondences and Federal court papers with an address at 175 King Street. Armonk, N.Y. 10504 and whereby no Iviewit offices were ever opened or authorized at this address. The office is directly across the street from Defendant in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit IBM’s world headquarters.
o Additional Evidence for the SEC regarding P. Stephen Lamont is contained in a June 18, 2009 Letter to New York Attorney General Chief of Staff, Steven M. Cohen regarding fraudulent activities of Lamont @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090618%20FINAL%20NYAG%20Steven%20Cohen%20Letter%20Re%20Lamont%20Signed.pdf
o The SEC should note here that Lamont’s initial resume submitted by Iviewit contracted employment recruiter, Brunelas, is materially different and contradicts what Lamont himself recently claims regarding his past on the Iviewit Homepage, in multiple court filings and other letters to Iviewit shareholders.
• Original 2001 Resume Submitted to Iviewit on P. Stephen Lamont by Brunelas @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Lamont%20Resume%20Given%20to%20Iviewit%20by%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• 2001 Resume Claims the following:
Columbia University School of Law ~ J. D. in Commercial and Regulatory Law - May 1992
Columbia University Graduate School of Business ~ M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting - May 1981
State University of New York at Cortland ~ B.A. in Economics - June 1978
• 2009 Iviewit Homepage Statement written by P. Stephen Lamont claims:
“By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit.
With more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering” Source www.iviewit.tv homepage.
• Whereby Lamont’s legal and other degrees claimed are wholly different and therefore false in one or both of his background accounts as they are materially different, again causation for further investigation of Lamont by the SEC and other investigators this letter has been copied or addressed to.
• Further, you will note that Lamont refers to himself as “former Acting CEO of Iviewit” and claims counsel advised him to resign any official role due to the potential for charges of fraud, and I advised Lamont to follow counsels’ advice and personally, I did not accept any official roles on counsels’ advice.
Yet, even in recent court documents and other illegally signed documents executed by Lamont to major Blue Chip companies, including Microsoft, Lamont now represents himself as CEO of Iviewit inapposite of counsels’ advice, at an address that is not registered to any company Lamont claims to be employed as CEO by.
• August 05, 2009 Lamont Letter to Microsoft http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20090805%20Lamont%20Illegal%20Letter%20to%20Microsoft.pdf
• Lamont further now claims such executive role in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, claiming he is CEO of Iviewit, when no Board has ever put him in that position and when he is fully cognizant that he has no authority legally to represent Iviewit Shareholders. Lamont even attempts to represent Iviewit Shareholders and Companies currently in Federal Court, while not having ever passed the bar to practice law and therefore precluded from representing others in court. Again, cause for further investigation of Lamont.
• February 09, 2009 Lamont Court Filing
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090209%20Lamont%20Attempt%20to%20Quash%20Bernstein%20Motion.pdf
• The SEC should note here that while the document claims service on February 09, 2008, it appears executed February 09, 2009.
Whereby the SEC should also note that Lamont does not represent himself individually in the Lawsuit but acts on behalf of Iviewit Shareholders of which he has no authorization from Shareholders to act on their behalf and also is not a lawyer, making it ILLEGAL for him to act on others behalf in a legal capacity.
The District Court and Second Circuit Court notified of this ILLEGAL representation and asked by me to force amendment of the complaint, instead continue to allow the ILLEGAL representation of Lamont to continue. This ILLEGAL representation of Shareholders is also a serious criminal act.
• Finally, at the company Digital Factory that Lamont lists as one of his former employers, in his resume previously exhibited herein, one of the company employees later disclosed that Lamont had been in stock trouble for securities fraud with the board of that company, of course Lamont’s resume failed to disclose this material fact.
• December 31, 2001 – Letter from Brunelas to Greg B. Thagard (“Thagard”) ~ Vice President Advanced Technology Technical Operations at Warner Bros. The letter is regarding Thagard’s acceptance of an Iviewit Advisory Board Position. Later both Thagard and Colter would receive Iviewit Stock options for their Board roles with approval of Warner Bros. and Sony executives.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011231%20Brunelas%20to%20Thagard%20Regarding%20Joining%20Iviewit%20Advisory%20Board.pdf
• January 07, 2002 ~ Letters by Lamont regarding his meeting with Rubenstein regarding Warner Bros et al. Rubenstein was presented the exhibited document in draft form at his deposition, where he read it and then dodged questions regarding why his name is referenced in relation to opinions he gave to Warner Bros. et al. after denying he knew anything about Iviewit or the patents.
The letter wholly contradicts his prior denial of knowing of the Iviewit inventions or Eliot Bernstein, contradicting his sworn deposition statements and sworn letters to Judge Jorge Labarga constituting multiple instances of perjury and more.
January 07, 2002 and more P. Lamont letters to Kenneth Rubenstein
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2006%2003%20Iviewit%20Rebuttal%20to%20Wheeler%202nd%20Response_Final.pdf
Pages 19-23
o November 20, 2002 Kenneth Rubenstein Deposition and Deposition Exhibits
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Depositions%20BOOKMARKED%20SEARCHABLE%20with%20hyperlink%20comments.pdf
Pages 1-100, the exhibits attached to the deposition show Kenneth Rubenstein’s denials.
• January 14, 2002 Warner Bros. employee Colter’s internal Warner Bros. document containing an ADMISSION OF USE OF IVIEWIT PROPRIETARY PROCESSES AND VIOLATION OF NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS by many Warner Bros. et al. employees. The letter also provides affirmation that Rubenstein ( MPEGLA LLC Patent Counsel, former Iviewit Proskauer Rose Patent Counsel and Warner Bros. counsel ) opined favorably to Warner Bros. The document again directly refutes Rubenstein’s statements in deposition and written communications to the Labarga court that he did not opine or even know of the Iviewit inventions.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
• February 17, 2002 – Eliot Bernstein letter to Brunelas Regarding Smith’s sudden request to have Rubenstein of Proskauer speak to him to re-opine on his former statements, already exhibited herein, regarding the efficacy and novelty of the patents.
Kenneth Rubenstein was acting Patent Counsel to Iviewit as indicated in the exhibited Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer billed to author and distribute to Iviewit potential investors when he opined to Warner Bros.
The links below provide information on Kenneth Rubenstein’s position as an Iviewit Board member and Iviewit Patent Counsel despite his statements to the contrary.
At the time Smith requested to speak with Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein already were terminated by Iviewit and investigations were already underway regarding the patent thefts and more.
o February 17, 2002 Letter from Eliot Bernstein to Brunelas.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020117%20Bernstein%20letter%20to%20Brunelas%20Regarding%20Smith%20response%20to%20Colter%20to%20talk%20with%20Rubenstein%20Poskauer.pdf
o January 2001 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, whereby the SEC should note here that Kenneth Rubenstein is listed both as Iviewit Patent Counsel and an Iviewit Advisory Board member.
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Wachovia%20Private%20Placement%20Memorandum%20Bookmarked.pdf
Page 4 – “Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio - Mr. Rubenstein is the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Page 16 - “Strong and Experienced Board of Directors and Advisory Board.” iviewit's Board of Directors and Advisors consist of several well-established individuals from the technology, entertainment, and financial community.
Directors have extensive backgrounds with top-tier firms such as Goldman Sachs, Kidder Peabody, and McKinsey & Co. Crossbow Ventures has provided $3.0 million in funding and sits on the Board.
Technology and entertainment guidance comes from a partner at Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway & Wertheimer and from Kenneth Rubenstein, the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Additionally on Page 16 - “The Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio. The Company's strategy is to establish market precedence through licensing of trade secrets and know-how.
Page 38 – ADVISORY BOARD SECTION
“Kenneth Rubenstein Partner, Proskauer Rose LLP. Mr. Rubenstein is a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP law firm and is the patent attorney for iviewit. He is a registered patent attorney before the US. Patent & Trademark Office.
Mr. Rubenstein counsels his clients with respect to the validity and infringement of competitors' patents, as well as prosecutes patent applications. For the past several years he has worked on the formation of a patent pool, for MPEG-2 technology, involving large consumer electronics and entertainment companies.
He is also a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. Mr. Rubenstein received his law degree, cum laude, from New York Law School and his Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he also graduated with a B.S. Degree.
The SEC should note here that Rubenstein’s attempt to claim he never heard of Iviewit, including at his deposition, allegedly is due to the massive conflicts of interest that Rubenstein had.
If Kenneth Rubenstein were patent counsel to Iviewit and simultaneously counsel to Warner Bros. et al. when he originally opined to Colter, without conflict waivers or disclosure, this obviously would have violated attorney conduct codes and law.
Additionally, Kenneth Rubenstein is conflicted with the patent pooling scheme and artifice to fraud inventors he has created, MPEGLA LLC, where again he acted as counsel and founder of MPEGLA LLC while also patent counsel to Iviewit.
The conflict here is again obvious where the Iviewit technologies were the single greatest threat to his pools as Iviewit has the dominant technology, which without, the MPEG license would be worthless.
The SEC should note that Rubenstein initially misrepresented himself and Joao as Proskauer Partners to Iviewit, when prior to learning of my inventions they were both with Meltzer.
Kenneth Rubenstein is counsel and sole patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC now one of the largest infringers of the Iviewit technologies, licensing Warner Bros et al.
Proskauer, after learning of my technologies value, estimated at a trillion dollars to “priceless” by leading engineers at Real 3D, Inc. and without a patent department at the time in 1998, then rushed to acquire Rubenstein and his Meltzer patent group and the MPEGLA LLC pools.
When the acquisition was complete, Proskauer, my former patent counsel, directly began inuring benefits from the stolen technologies via their new client MPEGLA LLC in their new Intellectual Property department created after learning of my inventions.
MPEGLA has now tied and bundled my inventions to their pools licensing schemes, converting the royalties from the technologies from Iviewit and through other anticompetitive tactics have kept Iviewit from market in classic RICO and Antitrust violations, including violations of Sherman and Clayton, as further defined in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit exhibited already herein.
The SEC should note here that Warner Bros. et al. and many of those involved directly in these matters are also involved in DVD patent pooling schemes, including but not limited to, DVD6C Patent Pool[4].
Whereby, similar to MPEGLA LLC’s illegal use of my technologies, DVD6C has similarly tied and bundled my technologies to their pools licenses, excluding me from royalties and then inuring royalties from others from my technologies directly from their membership in the pool.
o The SEC should note that the only Meltzer Intellectual Property attorney not to transfer to Proskauer at the time of acquisition was a one Raymond Joao, who initially with Rubenstein was represented as a Proskauer partner and who took initial patent disclosures with Rubenstein.
In 1999-2000 it was learned that Raymond Joao was putting patents into his own name while sabotaging the Iviewit patents. Upon leaving Iviewit, Joao claimed publically that he had 90+ patents in his name and then went to work for Marc S. Dreier, recently prosecuted and convicted by the SEC for an alleged Ponzi scheme, as further evidenced later herein.
February 08, 2002 – Lamont letter to John D. Calkins (“Calkins”) ~ Senior Vice President New Media Business Development of Warner Bros., regarding stock issued to Warner Bros. employees Colter and Thagard for Advisory Board roles they accepted and also regarding their about face and breach of contracts.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020208%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Re%20Colter%20and%20Thagard%20Advisory%20Board%20Stock.pdf
• February 20, 2002 – Calkins Letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
The SEC should note that opposite of Warner Bros. claim in the letter that Iviewit is creating a false record, it is instead Warner Bros. that attempts to create a false and misleading record of fact in the letter.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020220%20Calkins%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Warner%20Bros%20Wayne%20Smith.pdf
• February 27, 2002 – Lamont to Calkins about Warner Bros. Breach of Contracts, the SEC should note that while Lamont relies on the NDA, the February 15, 2001 SIGNED LICENSING AGREEMENT, illustrated above, also has strong language about IP rights concerning the Iviewit technologies that also are violated.
Also, take note, that at this time in 2002, Warner Bros. et al. knew of the breaches and formally was notified by Iviewit at that time of such breaches and therefore they should have begun accounting for the IP Liabilities at this time, if not earlier according to FASB accounting rules.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020227%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Breach%20more.pdf
• March 05, 2002 – Smith letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020305%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Calkins.pdf
• November 20, 2002 - April 15, 2002 Letter by Lamont to Rubenstein Regarding Conversations with Warner Bros et al. presented to Rubenstein at his November 20, 2002 Deposition as already discussed herein.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Kenneth%20Rubenstein%20Deposition%20with%20Exhibits%20CERT.pdf
pages 3-9
Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros. et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements.
Warner Bros. et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.
Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged criminal RICO activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros. et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of pouring in $25 Million Dollars in investment capital to my companies.
When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the filed patents and Calkins regarding corporate fraud.
At that time, Warner Bros et al. employees and personnel became aware of fraud relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional to what Andersen had found on or about that time and this information was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Smith and Calkins.
Colter relayed that Warner Bros. et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement.
A Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer circulated to potential Iviewit investors including Warner Bros. et al. These Securities Frauds contained in the Private Placement are also cause for further SEC investigation.
Per Colter, Warner Bros. et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer Rose, Foley and Larder and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.
Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues.
Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.
Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office which resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions.
Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP.
Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by their counsel Proskauer Rose.
Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer Rose LLP or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement.
It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer Rose were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer Rose LLP and had Stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations.
Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies.
The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office and others.
Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose law firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit.
Kenneth Rubenstein is under investigation with other attorneys by Moatz and was also ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of five justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety for violating public offices to block complaints I filed against him.
Where later, after discovery of the Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, it was learned that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros. was working with Kenneth Rubenstein ( Iviewit Patent Counsel, MPEGLA Counsel and Warner Bros. Counsel ) and that their relationship somehow now precluded Kenneth Rubenstein from re-opining on his prior opinion of the patents for Warner Bros. employees as already evidenced herein.
Whereby Warner Bros. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of those binding signed agreements.
The MPEGLA LLC patent pooling scheme created and overseen by Counsel Rubenstein is merely an artifice to defraud inventors and has illegally precluded me from market in classic antitrust activities, including death threats and a car bomb.
Whereby the DVD Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in have also used the technologies in violation of signed contracts and agreements, admittedly, yet since that time they too have excluded Iviewit from market, again in classic antitrust activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 year Massive Liabilities.
The SEC should note that while there is a long gap in time between these prior Iviewit and Warner Bros et al., communications and contracts and the current contact to notify them again of liabilities resulting from the IP infringement and the newer Lawsuit liabilities, that during the gap I was actively pursuing my rights.
I have given similar information to several investigators and courts over the several years in between communications regarding Warner Bros. et al. involvement in the Iviewit allegations in my Federal RICO Lawsuit.
During the time, I was also forced to flee my home several times for my family’s safety, including from death threats from Mr. Brian Utley on behalf of the law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner and then from actual Attempted Murder of my family. Attempted Murder through a Car Bombing of my family minivan in Del Ray Beach, FL., images of the Car Bombing can be found on the www.iviewit.tv [5] homepage.
Eliot Bernstein... Information to be found at http://www.iviewit.tv/
More Details on the Iviewit Case at www.Iviewit.TV
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)