the Florida State Bar and the Florida Supreme Court is Allowing Florida Attorneys to Run Amok - time For a Florida Grand Jury on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case. Attempted Murder NOT investigated, Proskauer Rose Corrupt Attorney Christopher Wheeler NOT investigated. Florida Corruption, Judges Paid Off ~ Enough is Enough !!
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Eliot I. Bernstein, Iviewit Technologies Vs. The Florida Bar. Florida Supreme Court Corruption and Cover Ups over the Iviewit Stolen Patent.
1. Does this Court have the power to intercede on behalf of Petitioners' constitutional rights guaranteed under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution when all other legal remedies instituted to protect such rights at the state level, such as access to the courts, due process and procedure and others, have all been usurped Petitioner by dubious methods employed by members of the system designed to protect such rights?
2. Does this Court have the power to intercede on behalf of Petitioner when the state courts and their self regulated attorney disciplinary system has been infiltrated and corrupted so as to turn the traditional mechanisms of protection for Petitioners' rights, against Petitioners' rights, by those charged with upholding such rights?
3. Did the Florida Supreme Court err in denying the motion for rehearing, clarification and certification?
4. Did the Florida Supreme Court not only err in decisions but in fact take actions to aid and abet members of that court and its disciplinary agencies and agents from escaping prosecution of violations of public office and conflicts of interests?
5. Did the Florida Supreme Court err in denying the petition for relief and did it also err in failing to provide an opinion or explanation?
6. Did the Florida Supreme Court err in refusing Petitioner's request for conflict of interest checks prior to considering the original petition?
7. Did the Florida Supreme Court err in failing to seek Judicial Qualifications Commission approval as requested by Petitioner prior to the ruling on the motion for rehearing, clarification and certification, in evaluating if their order to destroy the records pertinent to conflicts of interests and violation of public offices of its members, prior to record retention policies, was an attempt to obstruct due process and procedure in effort to aid and abet its members caught in conflict and does this Court have power to levy such charges against them?
8. Does the order to destroy the work product files of The Florida Bar and only return Petitioner filings to Petitioner constitute the basis for charges of obstruction of justice by this Court, as that courts efforts were designed to deny this Court all the facts and evidence in the matters now before this Court?
9. Was the Florida Supreme Court obligated to report the conflicts of interest, violations of public offices at The Florida Bar they oversight, asserted and confirmed conflicts of interests, to the proper authorities?
10. Does the failure to report constitute basis for charges by this Court against that court for failure to uphold justice and follow state law and procedure?
11. Was the Florida Supreme Court obligated to review the merits of attorney misconduct pursuant to their exclusive jurisdiction to regulate and discipline attorneys in the state of Florida?
12. Did the Florida Supreme Court err and further act as accomplice by not allowing Petitioners' complaints to be filed against public office members of Respondent caught in conflict of interest and abuse of public office?
Is such refusal of complaints against public officers against the intent of the Florida and United State constitutions when creating a complaint process to protect the public's interest from conflict of interests and abuses of public offices?
13. Did the Florida Supreme Court fail to follow judicial cannons and attorney conduct codes, in its refusal to make disclosed conflicts of interest at the Florida Supreme Court, and at the Florida civil court.
14. Should this Court take a leading role in establishing oversight to the administration of justice in the matters where the state supreme courts of the states having traditional jurisdiction are now in an adversarial role with Petitioner to block access to the legal and enforcement agencies of those states.
LIST OF PARTIES
[X] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this petition is as follows:
Iviewit Technologies, Inc., any and all affiliates both known and unknown
Iviewit Holdings, Inc., any and all affiliates both known and unknown
The Florida Bar
Christopher C. Wheeler
Matthew Triggs
Eric Turner
Lorraine Hoffman
Kelly Overstreet Johnson
Joy Bartmon
Kenneth Marvin
John Anthony Boggs "
Source of Post and Tons more Documents and Details.
http://www.iviewit.tv/supreme%20court/index.htm
Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Florida Supreme Court Corruption, Judicial Corruption.
Friday, June 4, 2010
Time to Disbar the Florida Bar. STOP Criminal Activity Among the Florida Attorney Fraternity.
The Florida Bar seems to constantly protect illegal activity among Florida Attorneys, to the point of a Trillion Dollar patent theft in which will soon take the investment portfolios of many shareholders of Warner Bros. , Intel, Time Warner Inc. , AOL and More involved in the Stealing of the Iviewit Technlogies Stolen Patent.
More on the Involvement of the Florida Courts and the Florida Bar in the aiding and abetting of stealing a Trillion Dollar Patent at: www.Iviewit.TV - www.DeniedPatent.com -
"" The Florida Bar is a mandatory organization of all lawyers who are licensed by the Supreme Court of Florida to practice law in the state.
John Harkness, Esq., is the Executive Director of The Florida Bar. Mr. Harkness’ core function is to oversee the prosecution of unethical lawyers.
Mr. Harkness’ responsibilities conflict with his position as a Director on the Board of The Florida Bar’s created malpractice carrier, Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company.
As a Director on the Board of the insurance company, Mr. Harkness’ duties include vigorously defending any attorney accused of ethical violations and legal malpractice, who are insured by FLMIC. Yet, Mr. Harkness has held these conflicted dual positions for more than a decade. ""
Other Links on
Iviewit Technologies and the Corrupt Florida Bar
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=the-florida-bar
http://miamimirror.blogspot.com/2010/01/formal-complaint-lodged-with-florida.html
http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies.html
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+%22florida+bar%22+%22iviewit%22&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/02/greenberg-traurig-openingly-stands-in.html
http://www.industrywhistleblower.tv/2010/02/list-of-parties-named-in-eliot.html
http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2009/12/iviewit-holdings-inc-conflict-of.html
http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/02/florida-bar-under-fire-for-lack-of.html
http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/response-to-why-data-compression-news.html
http://www.bankruptcytrusteefraud.com/2010/03/fbi-coverups-boca-police-scandals-major.html
Monday, February 1, 2010
Christopher C. Wheeler - Proskaur Rose Above the Law
to Protect and Which Attorneys to Hold Accountable?

There is NO LAW, only Politics, Persuasion, Favors, Side Deals and Who Can do What for Whom...
Greenberg Traurig Openingly Stands in Conflict of Interest, Yet Represents the Florida State Bar as If They are On the Right Side of the Law.
Greenberg Traurig represents the Florida Bar right? as in Toady's Headlines where Jesse Diner claims ONE BAD APPLE.. .. to funny .. but yes he had the Balls to Say it...
Greenberg Traurig seems to be Behind a whole lot of Evil Goin' on Down there in the State of Florida.
Greenberg Traurig is friends of Abramoff Right? And Greenberg Traurig has a bit to do with the Stanford scandal Right?
And Come on How Blatant Can you Get about your Total Disregard for the "Conflict of Interest Thing" When Greenberg Traurig Represented Iviewit somehow right?
I mean didn't Greenberg Traurig do a patent review for the Iviewit Technology Company as retained counsel and then in a Blatant Above the Law and in Total dis-Regard of Conflicts of Interest and Attorney Ethics they turned around and then Represented the Florida State Bar against the Iviewit Company, Hmmmm..
this stuff is So Blatant and So Obvious.
That there is No Way you could ever wonder if the State of Florida holds attorneys accountable, Holds Attorneys to ANY kind of ethics, the Florida State Bar does NOT care about conflicts of interest... it is all about protecting their own asses and We the People, Who Cares About them?
Greenberg Traurig is not accountable for Conflicts of Interest so No Wonder the Florida State Bar is NOT accountable and no Wonder Jesse Diner thinks there is only "one Rotten apple"...
Florida State Bar, Greenberg Traurig
RICO Complaint against Florida State Bar and Florida Supreme Court - Lorraine Hoffman - Eric Turner - Matthew Triggs - John Boggs
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
LORRAINE HOFFMAN,
ERIC TURNER,
JOHN BOGGS,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON,
JOY BARTMON,
GERALD BEERS,
KENNETH MARVIN,
MATTHEW TRIGGS and
CHRISTOPHER WHEELER "
Contributory Antitrust Violations
Facilitates RICO Violations
VIOLATIONS OF THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR
VIOLATIONS OF THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICES
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
IMPROPRIETY
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
FAILURE TO FILE CHARGES AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICER
CAUGHT IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE -
MATTHEW TRIGGS & KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE - DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE -
FAILURE TO DOCKET COMPLAINTS AGAINST
TRIGGS, WHEELER, TURNER & HOFFMAN
OBSTRUCTIONS OF JUSTICE
FAILURE TO FOLLOW JUDICIAL CANNONS ""
Source of Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/THE%20FLORIDA%20BAR.htm
Florida Bar Complaints